User talk:HeavyIons

Welcome!

Hi HeavyIons! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Kj cheetham (talk) 20:53, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Kj cheetham,

Thank you for your kind greeting. It will be fun to work on Wikipedia. Of course, I have a specific goal in mind which is to translate a page about a friend and colleague from the German Wikipedia to the English Wikipedia ... but I understand that I have to practice by doing some service work before submitting it. I was hoping that translating an existing page wouldn't count as a "new" page but I understand the rules. I'm off and running :-)

Have a great day!

Cheers,

Jim HeavyIons (talk) 21:30, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Jim, translating something from German Wikipedia still counts as new to English Wikipedia I believe! Given it's an article about someone you know, you should also be aware of it being a potential conflict of interest, so you should take a look at WP:COI too. But should be okay if you put it through WP:AFC once you're ready rather than moving it to mainspace yourself. Have fun! -Kj cheetham (talk) 21:40, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Howard Wieman has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Howard Wieman. Thanks! CNMall41 (talk) 00:41, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear CNMall41,

Thank you for your quick reply. I'm having fun and learning a lot about how the Wikipedia world works ... but obviously I have much more to learn.

The Draft article about Howard Wieman (English) is a nearly word for word translation of the same article that was posted on the German Wikipedia for a number of years. See Howard Wieman – Wikipedia The content of the original German article (not authored by me) was taken mostly from material collected at the American Physics Society and I included that reference in the English draft as Reference 1 (Prize Recipient (aps.org)) .

Are these sufficiently good references for review? I would be delighted to hear your thoughts. HeavyIons (talk) 01:07, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Howard Wieman (May 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to

meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria
or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth

Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Possibly notable, but the sources aren't enough to satisfy WP:GNG, and I don't think those awards establish notability either. Happy to be proven wrong, if someone can point out exactly what makes this person notable and what evidence supports such an assertion.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Howard Wieman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:47, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, HeavyIons! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:47, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Howard Wieman

Hello, HeavyIons. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Howard Wieman".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 14:09, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]