User talk:Heaven12345

Lord Loss

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! You might want to take a look at my comments on the Lord Loss talk page under the heading "Reception". Your recent edits in this section of the page seem to be written as a review, or even as a fansite. Wikipedia is not to advertise products, but to provide a neutral point of view with verifiable sources. In addition, the style of your contribution needs to be significantly changed in order for your section to read like an encyclopedia article. Please feel free to ask for assistance and leave your comments and opinions on the article's talk page. --Ericdn (talk) 20:26, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Heaven12345! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Stephenb (Talk) 22:11, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Stephenb (Talk) 22:11, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Alfriston, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -Lilac Soul ^{(talk • contribs • count)} 20:12, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to the page Alfriston constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 20:16, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to List of religions and spiritual traditions. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Alansohn (talk) 21:15, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

http://spam.brainyquote.com

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by some search engines, including Google. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:14, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

warning

Please stop. If you continue to use talk pages such as User talk:JQF for inappropriate discussion, you may be blocked.

Please stop. If you continue to use talk pages such as User talk:Eleven even for inappropriate discussion, you may be blocked.

Please stop. If you continue to use talk pages such as User talk:72.92.99.124 for inappropriate discussion, you may be blocked.

Please stop. If you continue to use talk pages such as User talk:75.15.152.211 for inappropriate discussion, you may be blocked.

rdunn PLIB 10:02, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below.

Alex Bakharev (talk) 01:09, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Heaven12345 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Have i been a naughty boy. Do I need a blocking. Boo hoo, i'm so upset. i can't help being so bad it was the way I was raised. I can't help being a naughty boy. Please don't block me. I have no life (like you) so I edit Wikipedia and set up my own religions (fancy becoming a member and owning Finland). I'm so lonely, so I can't help being a naughty boy

Decline reason:

Your request to be unblocked is declined because it does not address the reason for your block or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince administrators either (a) that the block was made in error or (b) that the block is no longer necessary because you understand what you are blocked for, you will not do it again and you will make productive contributions instead. Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 13:28, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Heaven12345 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I won't try and set up my religion again and I have made some serious edits. Can I please be allowed back on (Heaven12345 (talk) 17:08, 20 March 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Decline reason:

While I do recognize that you've made serious, good-faith contributions, you've also vandalized. Thank you for agreeing not to "set up your religion" but I want to make sure you agree not to vandalize any more, such as you did in your edit to Moscow: [1]. Also, it would be good to understand specifically what kinds of contributions you are interested in making. Mango juice^talk 18:14, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Heaven12345 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I promise not to vandalize again. History interests me most, especially British so I intend to edit primarily on them sort of pages. (Heaven12345 (talk) 18:50, 20 March 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Decline reason:

Your "downfall of Wikipedia" crap goes back at least to February 19. Given the balance of useless edits/vandalism versus minor constructive edits (as well as some of your facetious unblock requests) the answer is no. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 00:18, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.