User talk:Healthredemption

Welcome!

Hello, Healthredemption, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Health Redemption Challenge, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Joseph2302 (talk) 19:05, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Health Redemption Challenge

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Health Redemption Challenge, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Joseph2302 (talk) 19:05, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Health Redemption Challenge

Hello Healthredemption,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Health Redemption Challenge for deletion, because it seems to be vandalism or a hoax.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Kavdiamanju (talk) 19:05, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone who thinks 'Health Redemption Challenge' page, should wait for it to be completed. Besides, anyone who would like to blatantly and irresponsibly contest an important page like this need to spend a year or two looking at health problems of American health system and take accountability (legal, financial, etc.) for the mistakes made by the physicians, insurance companies, etc. So have some patience to get it completed and if you are American (i.e. living in USA) and using its health system, it may benefit you. So please don't be an instant opinionator without willing to take a responsibility to know the health system. There is another question - are you associated with the American health system and if so then you have a conflict of interest too? Healthredemption (talk) 19:23, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice. Thank you. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 19:34, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Once the page is fully edited (it is currently work in progress and could take a day or two), probably a new user name will be selected that makes remembering it is easy. Healthredemption (talk) 19:42, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Healthredemption (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The user name will be changed after the article is done, used that username so that I remember what I am editing. As one gets old one works differently to remember things. I am not sure how you would know the tone of the article even if it is a fact. I have looked at the article guidelines on wikipedia. A lie automatically does not become neutral by virtue of a thousand people repeating it and similarly truth will be true even if one person states it. Truth stands on its own and not because of majority people consent to it. Similarly the logic of tone of the article can be said about. That is why there is confusion about the article by those who have not read it fully and more importantly about the veracity or accountability of the facts (though in the article in editing mode). Being a custodian of quality information is essential but not rash conclusion by anyone who without any sense of accountability of the facts and commenting on the facts is unwarranted. I am realizing the quality of commentators accountability in this instance. Hope whether it is Joseph or other folks on Wiki take it logically, factually and not personally - the greater purpose of wikipedia. I hope I am stating a fact here rather than marketing of wikipedia's purpose. Healthredemption (talk) 20:30, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No. The username must be changed (use {{unblock-un}}) before you can edit anything further. Whether the article can survive is a seperate matter, which will be decided subsequently. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 21:10, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If you want to remember what you're working on, you can add an article to your watchlist or check your own contributions (there's a "Contributions" link at the very top of every Wikipedia page, right next to "Log out", that will bring up your past edits, with links to the articles, unless they have been deleted). On an unrelated note, Wikipedia requires reliable sources that are independent of the subject for its articles. "Verifiability, not truth" has long been our motto. Huon (talk) 21:11, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On another note, Health Redemption Challenge was deleted because it wasn't neutral point of view- "the logic of tone of the article can be said about" is not a valid argument for why the tone wasn't neutral, and if you aren't going to write in a way that obeys WP:NPOV, it will never be accepted. Joseph2302 (talk) 21:15, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]