User talk:TaylorRhodes

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

TaylorRhodes (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

TaylorRhodes (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Nihonjoe claims that the username 'is obviously profane, threatens, attacks or impersonates another person, or suggests that you do not intend to contribute positively to the encyclopedia' without any explanation of which of these reasons (profanity, threatening, attacking etc) he/she has objection to. None of these reasons is justifiable in blocking this username as it is clearly none of these things and certainly no more offensive than 'Nihonjoe' is as a username. I request immediate unblocking so that I may continue to contribute to the ongoing development of Wikipedia.

Accept reason:

Renamed. TonyBallioni (talk) 04:45, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pinging Nihonjoe for clarification, but I know that "darkie" is a derogatory term for a black person in America. 331dot (talk) 08:36, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

- I don't have anything to add to what's already been said by Zebedee. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 18:51, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
"Darkie" is also a derogatory term for a black person in the UK and in a number of other parts of the world. I can appreciate that the name Haydarkie could easily have been chosen innocently and not intended to convey "darkie" at all, but I think a rename would be be wise. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:26, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

While the inference of a racial undertone is wrong it appears the only recourse is to change the username. I understand I cannot change the username until I'm unblocked. Would Wikipedia please allow this process to move forward? Haydarkie (talk) 21:56, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you type a new choice of username where it says "new username" in your request, I can rename your account. You may want to see if you new choice is available by using Special:CentralAuth. 331dot (talk) 22:05, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks 331dot but all links to "new username" go to a page indicating the username is blocked. Is there another page that gives me detailed instructions as I haven't been able to find it? Haydarkie (talk) 22:13, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You need to edit your unblock request to remove the words "new username" and add your choice of name. 331dot (talk) 22:16, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If for some reason you are unable to do that, just type your choice of name here. 331dot (talk) 22:17, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No that didn't work. The proposed username is 'TaylorRhodes'. I think this should be more acceptable. Thanks 331dot Haydarkie (talk) 22:19, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks 331dot. Message now appears 'User account "TaylorRhodes" is not registered.' Haydarkie (talk) 22:24, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to move it, but the system says your choice is too similar to an existing name, so you will need to choose another. 331dot (talk) 22:35, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

331dot, I've renamed. I'll explain more on your talk. TonyBallioni (talk) 04:44, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks TonyBallioni TaylorRhodes (talk) 07:38, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:310 St Kilda Rd has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:310 St Kilda Rd. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 19:05, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Repatriation Commission Outpatient Clinic has been accepted

Repatriation Commission Outpatient Clinic, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Dan arndt (talk) 01:03, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Flag icons

Hello. You may have noticed that I have reverted your addition of flag icons to the infoboxes of several Australian military personnel. As noted at WP:INFOBOXFLAG, WP:ICON and WP:III, the use of flags and similar icons in infoboxes is strongly discouraged since they tend to crowd the limited space and add little to no value. Accordingly, it would be appreciated if you could cease adding flag icons to infoboxes. Many thanks, Abraham, B.S. (talk) 05:17, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Veteran artists moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Veteran artists, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~ Matthewrb ^{Talk to me · Changes I've made} 01:45, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for putting article in correct area. Acknowledge a work in progress. TaylorRhodes (talk) 02:08, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Veterans Arts (September 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Greenman were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Veterans Arts and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 13:57, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TaylorRhodes! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 13:57, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Richard Boyer (broadcaster), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Australian Imperial Force. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Veterans Arts

Hello, TaylorRhodes. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Veterans Arts, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Veteran artists (October 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GraziePrego was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

All entries need citations. Also add the heading for reference list.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Veteran artists and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GraziePrego (talk) 03:50, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @GraziePrego for the feedback on the proposed article on Veteran Artists. TaylorRhodes (talk) 03:54, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Veteran artists

Hello, TaylorRhodes. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Veteran artists, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:06, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]