User talk:Haueirlan

Welcome!

Hello, Haueirlan!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Fettlemap (talk) 20:49, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of James Blake (entrepreneur) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James Blake (entrepreneur) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Blake (entrepreneur) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Samir Bishal (talk) 17:56, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you purposefully and blatantly harass other editors, as you did at Sharly Modak. Hey, If you think a page is not meeting Wikipedia's guidelines then select the page for AFD, don't move the page from main space to draft-space because the page is already reviewed by an experienced contributer who is contributing more than 10 years on wikipedia. So if you do this behaviour I'll report this to ANI. Samir Bishal (talk) 20:50, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You issued a Final Warning which goes against the policy. You should have used level 1 warning since this your first message to me. Also, you reverted this[1] without any explanation on the talk page which you should have done. But as I can see your account is even newer than me so it is better if you choose the AfC to publish your page instead of moving directly to the mainspace. Anyway, as your message suggest, I will go ahead with the Afd and if you think I violated the policies then you may go ahead and report me to ANI. Thank you. Haueirlan (talk) 05:30, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As per rules if any subject is on wikipedia more than 90 days then you can not draftify the subject. What you can do is to select the subject for AFD. And It is true I am new here, but didn't do any mistake because I made the page a new page reviewer reviewd the page because he/she checked the page is notable. So in this case AFC and normal process is not a problem if the subject is notable. Samir Bishal (talk) 07:24, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is no such explicit policy or guidelines that says you cannot draftify a topic that has been on mainspace for more than 90 days except a rough consensus[2] and the notability of the topic is yet to be assessed. Btw, you might be new here but within 4 months you seem to know a lot, so much that you submitted a SPI and even threatened me with a block via ANI. Do you have any other accounts or have edited Wikipedia before? In such a case you need to disclose it. Haueirlan (talk) 09:39, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I am new and I am still learnig from many editors and Wikipedia's guidelines. I hope I'll also learn something from you. Samir Bishal (talk) 11:09, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draftification

Hello, Haueirlan,

Please do not move articles from main space to Draft space. You are not experienced enough as an editor to know when doing this is appropriate. Please focus on improving your editing skills by working on existing articles and stay away from administrative tasks until you have more experience or have some training in the New Pages Patrol so you are better about assessing the quality and potential of new articles.

If you have questions about this request, please bring them to the Teahouse where you can get support and advice from more experienced editors. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:35, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have spent more than a year on Wikipedia but started editing lately and I do have grasp of the basic policies but since you have asked me to refrain from these tasks then I won't do it. I shall contact you after having a considerable amount of edit counts. Thank you. Haueirlan (talk) 05:25, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Bennet43 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bennet43. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Blablubbs (talk) 20:39, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]