User talk:HatsOff

Welcome!

Hello, HatsOff, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

I'm going to move your article on Padraig rynne to a capitalised title. In the meantime, you would be well-advised to look at our guidelines on notability and verifiability and add suitable references, otherwise the article is likely to be deleted. Deb (talk) 10:32, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pádraig Rynne

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Pádraig Rynne, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Ruby Murray 11:19, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

Thanks for replying to me. There is no conflict of interest here. I am a music lover who is adding some info on musicians who are not on wikipedia. I am taking info from their official pages as I did here. I was in the process of referencing them when the page was deleted. All information provided on this page is correct as per their official websites and also can be found with a simple search online. The only external links provided were to the musicians official web page and his bands official web page where the very same info is available as provided here.

I would be very grateful if you would review your decision to delete the page after reading my reply.

Kindest regards, Harry

Hello, HatsOff. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:00, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Promotional writing, independent sources, and copyright

I see that you said, referring to the article Padraig rynne, that you "cannot see any suggestion of promotion on it". The page was full of such langauge as "at the forefront of ground breaking projects", "one of the finest concertina players in Irish music today", "outstanding", "the trend setters in World / Irish music". Moreover, even the parts of it which avoided such blatantly promotional language were all heavily slanted to the idea that Pádraig Rynne is a great musician. There is no reasonable way of seeing any of the article as being written from a neutral point of view, as required for a Wikipedia article. If, as you stated above, the content was taken "from their official pages" then that is not at all surprising, as a musician's web site will present him or her in a favourable light, and will not be written from a neutral point of view. The web site of a person, company, or organisation is almost never a suitable source for writing a Wikipedia article. Instead, content should be based on independent, third party, sources. (Also, since you wrote "I am taking info from their official pages", it is important to make sure you do not copy the actual wording from those pages, as doing so would infringe copyright.) The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:30, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks James.

Can you make the page live again and I will edit it removing any such content and rewrite as suggest in my own words content from their websites? Many thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HatsOff (talk • contribs) 12:37, 25 February 2014‎

I have "userfied" the article, which means that I have restored its content at User:HatsOff/Pádraig Rynne. It can stay there temporarily while you work on it, and when it is ready it can be moved back to Pádraig Rynne as an article.

When you post to a talk page, you should end your post with four tildes (in other word ~~~~). That will be automatically converted into a signature, including a link to your talk page. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:21, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

HatsOff, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi HatsOff! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! SarahStierch (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:40, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]