User talk:HarveyPrototype

It is approximately 8:11 AM where this user lives (Ecuador). [refresh]

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, HarveyPrototype! I am Marek69 and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Marek.69 ^talk 02:26, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

re your question

Hi HarveyPrototype, in answer to your question, I noticed your edits on the Quito article, an the fact that your talk page was a 'red-link' (so probably relatively new to the project), so I thought I would welcome you :-) Marek.69 ^talk 14:04, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi HarveyPrototype,

In order to upload a file, just go to Wikipedia:Upload (The link is also in the 'toolbox' section of the lefthand toolbar)

Please check the copyright of the image first, before you upload it. (See also Wikipedia:Copyrights)

With regards to the coordinates of each campus, I think you'll find the relevant information in this article Wikipedia:WikiProject_Geographical_coordinates#Parameters, subsection 'name'

I hope this helps :-) Marek.69 ^talk 21:45, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi HarveyPrototype, I've left a reply to your message on my talk page -- Marek.69 ^talk 14:50, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, I've had a look and I'm not quite sure what the problem is. I must admit I'm not exactly an expert on images or the rules governing 'fair use' and copyrights. It may be a good idea to ask at Wikipedia:Help desk to get some additional help from editors who are more clued up on this.

Meanwhile I'll do what I can to help. I'll keep you informed of my progress :-) Marek.69 ^talk 14:57, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Userbox

Hi HarveyPrototype, I've left a reply to your message on my talk page -- Marek.69 ^talk 21:28, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've created a subpage with a basic userbox here and placed a userbox on your userpage.

It will start you off in the right direction, feel free to play with it an experiment, until you like it :-) Marek.69 ^talk 21:42, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Marek69

You've helped me in the past starting me off with useboxes. Could you point me in the right direction towards creating a template?

I came across this template.

And I want to do the same for Universities in Ecuador.

However I can't reach te wikitext HarveyPrototype (talk) 03:59, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:PiramideUPACIFICO.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PiramideUPACIFICO.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. clpo13_(talk) 16:48, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi the article is here> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universidad_Del_Pac%C3%ADfico_%E2%80%93_Ecuador HarveyPrototype (talk) 23:50, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:LogoUPACIFICO.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LogoUPACIFICO.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. clpo13_(talk) 16:48, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Danilo Rosero (August 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Mostly unreferenced – where is all this information coming from?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Danilo Rosero and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:45, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, HarveyPrototype! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:45, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, HarveyPrototype. Thank you for your work on Andrea González Náder. User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 21:48, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you,

That very same article got me banned from Wikipedia ES HarveyPrototype (talk) 01:35, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Danilo Rosero

Hello, HarveyPrototype. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Danilo Rosero, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:08, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Universidad Del Pacífico – Ecuador for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Universidad Del Pacífico – Ecuador is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Universidad Del Pacífico – Ecuador until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Allan Nonymous (talk) 13:13, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, HarveyPrototype. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Universidad Del Pacífico – Ecuador, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Allan Nonymous (talk) 18:36, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have scoured the different COI forums, and have yet to find a forum that states that writing an article as an Alumnus of a University is condiered a COI. As an Alumnus I recieve the Alumni news letter and therefore recieve information which may be pertinant to the article.

Neither the current guidelines Wikipedia:Conflict of interest nor the current discussion Wikipedia talk:Conflict of interest which sumarizes conflict of interest to the following:

To preserve the integrity, neutrality, and public trust in Wikipedia, it is crucial to effectively manage conflicts of interest among editors. A conflict of interest arises when an editor's personal or financial connections might compromise the objectivity of their contributions. This policy outlines the types of conflicts and specifies the conduct required for editors who may be affected by them.

===Financial Conflict of Interest===

An editor has a financial conflict of interest when they stand to gain, or can reasonably be expected to gain, financial benefits from the coverage of a topic on Wikipedia. This conflict arises in various forms:

Direct Financial Benefits: These include receiving direct payment for editing Wikipedia articles
Indirect Financial Benefits: Such benefits are not as overt as direct payments but are significant. Examples include:
- Business Exposure: Gaining from increased visibility when a product, service, or company is featured in an article.
- Reputation Enhancement: Benefiting indirectly from an enhanced reputation due to having a personal article on Wikipedia or being cited as a source in one. This can lead to increased professional opportunities, such as book sales, speaking engagements, or consultancy work.

===Non-financial Conflict of Interest===

An editor has a non-financial conflict of interest when their personal or professional connections may compromise their ability to present a subject objectively. This type of conflict arises in various forms:

Personal Relationships: Editing articles about friends, colleagues, family members, romantic partners, or personal adversaries can lead to biased content, whether overly favorable or unduly negative.
Professional Connections: Editing articles related to one's employer or competitors in the industry can introduce biases that may either unfairly promote one’s own organization or undermine others.
Political and Ideological Beliefs: Editing articles that cover political or religious movements in which an individual holds an active role. It is important to note that simply being a supporter or member of such movements does not constitute a conflict of interest. For example, a member of the Democratic Party does not inherently have a conflict of interest when editing articles related to the party unless they hold an official role within it.

===Managing Conflicts===

Editors with a Financial Conflict: Must not directly edit affected articles. Instead, they should propose changes using the Edit COI template, disclosing the nature of their conflict on their user page and in any location they discuss the topic.
Editors with Non-financial Conflicts: While not strictly forbidden from directly editing affected articles, they must disclose their conflict in the edit summary and in any location they discuss the topic.

No exceptions exist to this policy; edits made in violation of it are indefensible, regardless of their perceived harmlessness or quality. Editors who wish to avoid disclosing their conflict of interest may do so only be avoiding topics affected by it.

May I suggest you take a look at the following article Wikipedia:Don't cry COI HarveyPrototype (talk) 20:45, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of users' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote—in order to influence User talk:James500#Recomendation on what to do. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Thank you. If you have questions about article sourcing, I would suggest WP:Teahouse for advice, calling in unrelated editors is frowned upon. Allan Nonymous (talk) 23:25, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank your for the information the reason that I have messaged @James500: is because he has explicitly mentioned the behaviour which I am experiencing on your talk page. Therefore I am requesting assistance as to how to handle said behavior. HarveyPrototype (talk) 23:54, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Allan Nonymous: A good faith question about whether behaviour falls within the scope of WP:HOUND is not canvassing. It is not canvassing to ask for advice in good faith. As far as I can see, there is no community discussion presently taking place about whether your behaviour was within the scope of WP:HOUND. I cannot be canvassed to !vote in a community discussion that does not exist. James500 (talk) 18:06, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank your James500. I'm still unclear as to ¿what procedure I should follow? From the response I understand that the comments on the talk page were not considered WP:HOUND given the situation. If I do feel that my actions on the Colegio Menor San Francisco de Quito (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colegio_Menor_San_Francisco_de_Quito) led to hounding on other entries.

What are my options? or what procedures should I follow? HarveyPrototype (talk) 22:20, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @Liz:,

Let me begin by apologizing if I am in fact canvassing however I am requesting that you get involved as on Allan Nonymous talk page you have already expressed your criteria on articles marked for deletion.

I am writing to address some concerns I have regarding the actions taken by editor Allan Nonymous, specifically in relation to their handling of deletion nominations and article maintenance.

On April 28, 2024, I encountered a page marked for deletion by Allan Nonymous due to lack of citations: Colegio Menor San Francisco de Quito (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colegio_Menor_San_Francisco_de_Quito). In response, I took the initiative to add citations to the article and subsequently removed the deletion template. The page has since been merged.

However, upon returning to Wikipedia, I discovered that articles I have contributed to, specifically the pages for Sonia Roca and Universidad Del Pacífico – Ecuador, have been flagged for issues.

The Sonia Roca page was marked for notability, despite the fact that the template regarding notability was lifted in 2022. Additionally, the Universidad Del Pacífico – Ecuador page was marked for deletion because the English page's translation was deleted on Wikipedia.es. While it is true that the Spanish version of the page was deleted, it seems that this decision was based on different criteria than those used on the English Wikipedia. Moreover, my attempts to contribute to the Spanish version of the page resulted in my being blocked on Wikipedia.es.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Sincerely,HarveyPrototype (talk) 00:19, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Christian Zurita, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 24 Horas.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of universities in Ecuador, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Jipijapa, Puyo and Otavalo.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of universities in Ecuador, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cuenca.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Universidad Del Pacífico – Ecuador alumni has been nominated for deletion

Category:Universidad Del Pacífico – Ecuador alumni has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Allan Nonymous (talk) 20:06, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the DCWC!

Welcome to the 2024 Developing Countries WikiContest, HarveyPrototype! The contest is now open for submissions. List your work at your submissions page to earn points. If you haven't done so already, please review the following:

Got open nominations? List them at review requests.
Looking for a topic to work on? Check out suggested articles and eligible reviews.
Not sure if your article qualifies? See the guidelines for more information or contact a coordinator for verification.
New to Wikipedia? Many experienced editors are part of this contest and willing to help; feel free to ask questions about the contest on the talk page.
Know someone else who might be interested? Sign-ups remain open until 15 July, so don't hesitate to invite other editors!

On behalf of the coordinators, we hope you enjoy participating and wish you good luck! If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page or ask one of the coordinators: Ixtal (talk · contribs), sawyer777 (talk · contribs), or TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list.) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 00:01, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DCWC August update

The 2024 Developing Countries WikiContest has now been running for a month, and we've already seen some momentous improvement in the quality of many articles about underrepresented subjects! So far, our top-scoring participants are:

Magentic Manifestations (submissions) – 338 points, mainly from nine good articles. He's a contender for the "most submissions for a single country" specialty award, with nine submissions for India.
Arconning (submissions) – 305 points, including from six seasonally-appropriate Olympics-related good articles.
Generalissima (submissions) – 290 points, the bulk from her featured article about Greenlandic interpreter Qalaherriaq and two China-related good articles.
AirshipJungleman29 (submissions) – 245 points, mostly from the achievement of bringing Genghis Khan to featured status.
Thebiguglyalien (submissions) – 144 points from three good articles, including two about Kiribati elections, and four reviews of good article nominees.

Looking for ways to climb up the leaderboard yourself? Help out your fellow participants by answering a few review requests, particularly the older entries. Several more nominations needing attention are listed at eligible reviews, and highlighed entries receive a 1.5× multiplier! The coordinators would like to extend a special thanks to Thebiguglyalien (submissions) for his commitment to keeping these review pages up to date.

If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page or ask one of the coordinators: Ixtal (talk · contribs), sawyer777 (talk · contribs), or TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list.) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 14:24, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DCWC September update

The Developing Countries WikiContest has now been running for two months, and we've seen tremendous improvement in the encyclopedic coverage of several underrepresented areas from a wide range of editors! The coordinators would like to highlght some of the newer faces who have been making notable contributions in the contest, including but by no means limited to:

Arconning (submissions) – 386 points, with several good articles primarily relating to the Olympics
Vigilantcosmicpenguin (submissions) – 141 points, who created multiple articles about abortion rights and laws in African countries
TheNuggeteer (submissions) – 126 points, who has contributed to several articles associated with the Phillippines
Jaguarnik (submissions) – 125 points, with several good article reviews and an appearance in the In the news section of the Main Page
Averageuntitleduser (submissions) – 119 points, and has written about several Haitian topics and historical figures.

Only one month remains until the end of the contest, so it's time to make your remaining nominations! Please consider answering some review requests, particularly the older entries, as a way of helping out your fellow participants and moving up the leaderboard. Good luck!

If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page or ask one of the coordinators: Ixtal (talk · contribs), sawyer777 (talk · contribs), or TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list.) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 22:00, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DCWC closing update

The 2024 Developing Countries WikiContest has come to a close! After a thrilling finish to the event with a slew of submissions on the final day, we have our winners. With 608 points, Thebiguglyalien (submissions) comes in third with his series of Kiribati and Botswanan submissions; BeanieFan11 (submissions) flies into second place at the last second with 771 points after a string of good articles about sportspersons; and after leading for much of contest's three months, Generalissima (submissions) finishes with a whopping 798 points to take home the Gold Belt Buckle. Congratulations to our winners!

In addition to his spot in the top three, BeanieFan11 (submissions) also wins the special awards for submitting under the most countries (44 countries) and for writing the most articles about women (15 Did you know? nominations)! Magentic Manifestations (submissions), after making 16 submissions under the Indian flag—15 of them good articles—receives the awards for most submissions for a single country and most featured or good articles promoted. For their submission of one FAC review, five FLC reviews, and 20 GAN reviews, Simongraham (submissions) wins for most article reviews.

The results of the contest have far exceeded any expectations the coordinators had for it at the beginning: among the submissions to the event were 3 FAs, 10 FLs, 88 GAs, dozens of article reviews of every kind, and more Did you know? submissions than we can count! Regardless of your level of participation, every contestant can be proud to have contributed towards a major step in countering the systemic bias on Wikipedia. Every year, millions of readers and editors around the globe use Wikipedia to educate themselves and communicate with others about parts of the world that often receive less attention than they deserve. Thank you for participating with us in the contest and contributing to this effort. The DCWC will return next year and we look forward to seeing you contribute again! However, before that...

We need your feedback! Join the conversation on the talk page to discuss your reflections on the contest (even if you didn't participate!) and help us make it better.

If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page or ask one of the coordinators: Ixtal (talk · contribs), sawyer777 (talk · contribs), or TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list.) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 19:02, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]