User talk:Harshitbhati2006jik

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 16:59, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Neela Ghoda

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Neela Ghoda requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -KAP03 (^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 05:26, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate that you enjoy using Wikipedia, please note that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a social network. Wikipedia is not a place to socialize or write things that are not directly related to improving the encyclopedia, as you did at Talk:Other Backward Class. Off-topic material may be deleted at any time. We're sorry if this message has discouraged you from editing here, but the ultimate goal of this website is to build an encyclopedia. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 18:27, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to iOS, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Yamla (talk) 11:55, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

July 2020

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:Yamla. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 08:04, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Editors are not required to be personally familiar with subjects that they are editing about; Wikipedia only summarizes what independent reliable sources state, so editors need only be familiar with reading and describing such sources. 331dot (talk) 08:05, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. 331dot (talk) 08:14, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you persist with personal attacks, the next block will likely be longer or indefinite. 331dot (talk) 08:15, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop editing the page Mihira Bhoja without any source

Dear user, stop editing the page mihira bhoja, to your response I've cited 7 sources claiming him to be a Rajput ruler of pratihara clan. Gurjara is a regional name it has nothing to do with gujjar community. Please understand and cooperate. R2dra (talk) 16:15, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You should also stop calling him a Rajput why can’t we use Kshatriya as it’s disputed wether he was a rajput or a Gurjar Harshitbhati2006jik (talk) 04:07, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

dear user, I've cited 7 sources claiming him to be a rajput ruler R2dra (talk) 05:34, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And they are false there have been multiple sources where he is stated to be a Gurjar king but people keep vandalising them Harshitbhati2006jik (talk) 05:41, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Mihira Bhoja, you may be blocked from editing. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 05:18, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Other people are trying to claim that a king of a community belongs to their community is that correct? Harshitbhati2006jik (talk) 06:36, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you blank out or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Paramara dynasty. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 15:11, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stop editing the Paramara dynasty without the contemporary evidences. You can't claim any Dynasty as per some Katha. You need strong contemporary snippets to support this.

Dear user, stop editing the page Paramara dynasty without any contemporary books or inscriptions. You can't claim any Dynasty as per some Katha. You need strong contemporary snippets to support your claims. Just having common surnames with the historical dynasties doesnt make a historical dynasty related to your community. Iamlionofthejungle (talk) 06:23, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That’s correct having common surnames doesn’t make them Rajputs so stop trying to whitewash history as they were Gurjars Harshitbhati2006jik (talk) 06:38, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Which royal documents prove them to be Gujjars? Cite some sources to base your claim. Iamlionofthejungle (talk) 06:39, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What royal documents prove them as Rajputs? Harshitbhati2006jik (talk) 15:05, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —SpacemanSpiff 11:48, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This site is supporting a bunch of hypocrites and history stealers and history tamperers

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Harshitbhati2006jik (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

So me editing and changing wrong information to the correct sourced information is wrong and resulted in me being blocked I need more explanations to why I was blocked and if I ain’t satisfied I would just conclude that this site supports a bunch of history stealers, history tamperers and helping in the spread of wrong information to the public Harshitbhati2006jik (talk) 13:42, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Clearly this isn't the website for you. The reason for the block seems to be correct, you are more interested in fighting battles than collaboration and consensus. 331dot (talk) 14:01, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Harshitbhati2006jik (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sorry for fighting battles if you give me one last chance I will ensure that I don’t attack certain people or words on pages I will do my job as an editor and contributor like a good person

Decline reason:

Please describe concisely and clearly how your edits merited a block, what you would do differently, and what constructive edits you would make. Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. Thanks. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 06:13, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.