User talk:Harrypotter1qq

Protocol of Corfu

Καλησπέρα and welcome to wikipedia. Take in mind that everything needs to be backed by reliable reference, per wp:RS. Cheers.Alexikoua (talk) 19:51, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Hello, I'm Velella. I noticed that you recently removed content from Protocol of Corfu without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 22:34, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Protocol of Corfu. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 talk 22:45, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:57, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sock puppet investigation

FYI: There is a wp:sockpuppet investigation opened regarding Harrypotter1qq (talk · contribs), Harrypotter1q (talk · contribs), and Department of knowledge (talk · contribs) wp:Sockpuppet investigations/Harrypotter1qq. Jim1138 talk 01:36, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Harrypotter1qq. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mz7 (talk) 01:41, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]