User talk:Happyman22

Old talk: User talk:Happyman22/archive1 New talk: (Start below)

DYK for List of Chicago Bears in the Pro Football Hall of Fame

On 8 January 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article List of Chicago Bears in the Pro Football Hall of Fame, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Chicago Bears have more individuals inducted into the Pro Football Hall of Fame than any other National Football League franchise? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 12:03, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

List of Chicago Bears first-round draft picks

Hi Happyman22, and thanks for your submissions to WP:FLC. Unfortunately, the one you already have has no support, no comments etc, so, per the rules, I've removed your second nomination. Feel free to nominate it again once you meet the criteria for submission. All the best. The Rambling Man (talk) 19:30, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Are you going to renominate this one.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 20:39, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your revert

Regarding this reversion, unless they wear their throwback I don't think what uniform they wore is notable. chris †ianrocker90 10:21, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think it is because they have worn white a home more often the past years, which is a break away from tradition and I think it is noteable to point that out. Happyman22 (talk) 13:18, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Then mention it in the article, the schedule shouldn't be pointing that out IMO. chris †ianrocker90 18:37, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Desmond Clark

Hey, how's it going? I see you've fallen into the "team pages have to be right" trap, so allow me to help pull you out of it. Team websites are crap. Pure and simple. They're run by some webmaster who has no idea what's going on and about 110% of the time, they're wrong. The only 100% accurate transaction wire is the one put out by Pro Football Weekly. PFW is the official transaction wire of the league and they're the ones who get all the moves from the league every day, so they're right every single time. For September 3, they have Desmond Clark being placed on IR. Meaning, that pretty much every media member who said he was released is wrong, as is the team's website. Never go by team website's. Ever. If you want to help out on the templates, PFW is the only way to make sure what you're doing is right. Cheers,--Giants27(T|C) 17:48, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, np. Thanks. Happyman22 (talk) 18:33, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:NFL team demo2

Template:NFL team demo2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Bulwersator (talk) 06:44, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2012 Chicago Bears season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WLEY (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:02, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Nice work on 2012 Chicago Bears season! Bear Down! Zappa O Mati 04:24, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas

	Bear Down!
	Merry Christmas! Nice work, again, on 2012 Chicago Bears season! Da Bears! Zappa O Mati 17:50, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2012 Chicago Bears season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marcus Robinson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:NFLClock-Bears-Large.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:NFLClock-Bears-Large.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 01:19, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:NFLClock-Bears-Large.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:NFLClock-Bears-Large.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 08:47, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox NFL team awards

Template:Infobox NFL team awards has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Magioladitis (talk) 19:20, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:BearsBox

Template:BearsBox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Jweiss11 (talk) 05:22, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:Infobox Orthodox Church

Template:Infobox Orthodox Church has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox Anglican Church. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:31, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox Orthodox Diocese

Template:Infobox Orthodox Diocese has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:35, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Serbmigra.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Serbmigra.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 09:10, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An invitation to join the WikiProject Republika Srpska

WikiProject Republika Srpska
Project Icon Hi, Happyman22, you are graciously extended an invitation to join the WikiProject Republika Srpska! WikiProject Republika Srpska is a WikiProject whose aim is to improve the quality and coverage of articles related to Republika Srpska and the Serbs of Bosnia and Herzegovina. It is chiefly designed to help users collaborate on articles, but also to resolve open questions and disputes, to establish project-wide conventions, and to coordinate work on vandalism clean-up. WikiProject Republika Srpska currently covers a total of 0 articles and 0 other related pages on the English Wikipedia.

We look forward to welcoming you to the project!

--Anulmanul (talk) 21:46, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox NFL championship game

Template:Infobox NFL championship game has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Alakzi (talk) 15:45, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion you May Be Interested In

Hello Happyman22, I have started a discussion here that you may be interested in participating in, as the featured list nominator of the List of Chicago Bears in the Pro Football Hall of Fame. Thanks, « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 02:58, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just so you know, as part of the results of the discussion I have restored List of Chicago Bears in the Pro Football Hall of Fame to its own standalone list. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 03:02, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vracar.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Vracar.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:22, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Epatriar.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Epatriar.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:23, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:ChurchDrven.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:ChurchDrven.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:38, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Patriarchate of Serbia

A tag has been placed on Template:Patriarchate of Serbia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page, where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Safiel (talk) 23:24, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Happyman22. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:NFL team demo

Template:NFL team demo has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 19:27, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Eastern Orthodox Church footer

Template:Eastern Orthodox Church footer has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 12:54, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chicago Bears statistics for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chicago Bears statistics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chicago Bears statistics until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Eagles 24/7 (C) 01:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Chicago Bears all-time record versus NFL for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Chicago Bears all-time record versus NFL is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Chicago Bears all-time record versus NFL until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

« Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 14:25, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CHI 363.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CHI 363.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:09, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]