User talk:HansOg

Just for future references:

This image is not in public domain. This is licensed with CC, but it is still copyrighted: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Image-Shelf_cloud_pano_oct07_ver4_edit.jpg --George Ho (talk) 23:19, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse Invite

Hello! HansOg, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. An awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! Rosalina2427 (talk) 00:20, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Resilient Barnstar
	Great job improving your user page and also joining the Arts Wikiproject. Keep up the good work and I hope you find editing jobs that are to your interests and expertise! v/r - T P 21:06, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tallow biodiesel topic

HansOg - I left a lengthy rational and some new citations on the Biodiesel Talk page; please discuss the matter there if you continue to be interested. Tallow is a common feedstock, but you've made the point that statistics would be useful. I am working on this, and your contribution will be kept in mind. Thanks.--E8 (talk) 22:55, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Survey Invite

Dear HansOg,

I'm working on a study of political motivations and how they effect editing. I'd like to ask you to take a survey. The survey should take 5 minutes. Your survey responses will be kept private. Our project is documented at m:Research:Wikipedia + Politics.

The survey link is: http://uchicago.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_eXOHLbXwbpfYC1f?Q_DL=e3DsAymc9y4ljrD_eXOHLbXwbpfYC1f_MLRP_9nvps68zQcKuyJT&Q_CHL=gl

I am asking you to participate in this study because you are a frequent editor of pages on Wikipedia that are of political interest. We would like to learn about your experiences in dealing with editors of different political orientations.

Sincere thanks for your help! Porteclefs (talk) 22:42, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Dross PsychoGoose.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Dross PsychoGoose.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 13:21, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]