User talk:Hannelsen

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Hannelsen! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Perfect4th (talk) 22:00, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Kastanaras moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Thomas Kastanaras, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) WP:NFOOTY is no longer a valid SNG, so GNG must be met. Also, since, they have not played in a league on the WP:FPL list, there might not be enough coverage to meet GNG. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:39, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user has reverted Onel5969's move to draftspace as vandalism. Both the move and the characterization as vandalism are inappropriate and worthy of some words. User:Hannelsen, this article lacks sufficient supporting sourcing to meet BLP. It properly belongs in draftspace until direct detailing of this subject is found and presented on the draft. Further moves from draft will be considered vandalism and will be reverted as such. BusterD (talk) 21:51, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Thomas Kastanaras for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thomas Kastanaras is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Kastanaras until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

VickKiang (talk) 00:25, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Hello Hannelsen. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Winamax, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Hannelsen. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Hannelsen|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:16, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]