User talk:Hanksummers
Welcome!
[edit]
|
Speedy deletion of Ten Champions Games in Ten Years
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Ten Champions Games in Ten Years requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. PookeyMaster (talk) 05:36, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Green Bay Football Corporaton
[edit]A tag has been placed on Green Bay Football Corporaton requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. PookeyMaster (talk) 03:55, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Your recent edits
[edit]Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 17:34, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Notre Dame starting quarterbacks, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 23:29, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- Hi Hanksummers... I'm sure that both you and I are in agreement that this page is worthy of retention. When you get a chance, check out the talk page for the "ND starting quarterbacks" article; scroll down to the bottom and note my proposed changes to the page format. Hopefully with the data presented in a more asthetically pleasing table format, people will get over the perception that the page is just a simple list of names. I look forward to your comments. -- Trowbridge (talk) 13:39, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
When he ran the Red Sox and the Indians, were they The Boys of Somers? Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 23:03, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
Cleveland Arena
[edit]I love your edits, do you know more about it, i think for boxing they could have accepted 11000? Mellowyellowdog (talk) 20:59, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
- Are you sure it's 15000 for boxing, i think it's 12000 if 10000 for hockey, provide evidence, as your source is the only one!
BIVINS TO MEET PASTOR BEFORE 12,500 TONIGHT WILFRID SMITH Chicago Daily Tribune (1872-1963); Apr 17, 1942; Historical Newspapers Chicago Tribune
- It says over 12000 capacity max! For hockey 9900, not 9600!
Proposed deletion of Ohio County Courts
[edit]
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Ohio County Courts, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- triviality, non-notability
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.
AfD nomination of Allison Payne
[edit]
An article that you have been involved in editing, Allison Payne, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allison Payne. Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Jayron32 02:58, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
November 2013 GA Thanks
[edit] | This user has contributed to Ara Parseghian good articles on Wikipedia. |
On behalf of WP:CHICAGO, I thank you for your editorial contributions to Ara Parseghian, which recently was promoted to WP:GA.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 19:11, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
Split of Chief Wahoo
[edit]I have been working for a few days on this and would like some other opinions.FriendlyFred (talk) 21:30, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Candace Smith for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Candace Smith until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.