Talk:Chief Wahoo

Chief Wahoo was nominated as a Sports and recreation good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (April 17, 2014). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Baseball Mid‑importance

	Baseball portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cleveland Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Cleveland, the scope of which includes Cleveland and the Greater Cleveland Area. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.ClevelandWikipedia:WikiProject ClevelandTemplate:WikiProject ClevelandCleveland articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Ohio Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ohio portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ohio (assessed as Low-importance).

Indigenous peoples of North America Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Archives

1

This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Aciccia93.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 17:23, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Subject of June 2013 Cleveland Frowns blog entry

The Cleveland sports blog "Cleveland Frowns" has posted an entry on this article. The blog's author is an outspoken critic of the Cleveland Indians' continued use of Chief Wahoo. Levdr1lp / talk 13:13, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Archived link to the now-deleted 2013 article: [1]. TJRC (talk) 02:40, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Split

As recommended in the GA review, the controversy content can be moved to a new article, leaving this to contain the origins and history of the logo. In accordance with the similar article, the Washington Redskins name controversy, the likely title would be Cleveland Indians name and logo controversy. The content of both articles should be further reduced by summarizing.FriendlyFred (talk) 04:15, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

After cleanup, moving content, and checking links, I am now ready to create a new article from the entire Controversy section, and the other "Statements..." sections which are also about the controversy.FriendlyFred (talk) 20:55, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ironically enough, both the Indians and the Redskins were originally named in reference to the Boston Braves. And the Braves name had a connection to Tammany Hall, the NYC political machine. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 00:26, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FriendlyFred, thanks for your work on this article. I think there are good arguments to be made both for and against a split. The best argument in favor of a split is the length of the article.

But I think the situation with the Washington name/logo controversy is a little different. The naming controversy is a perennial issue, but most published sources that discuss the team are talking specifically and primarily about football, not the controversy. With Chief Wahoo, most published sources are talking about the controversy itself. Even sources that discuss the history and use of the logo are discussing it within the context of that controversy. If a split makes sense, I think the primary article should continue to reflect that context. Anotherpioneer (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 04:04, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

After a week without opposition to a split, I have created the new article Cleveland Indians name and logo controversy and will proceed to remove most of the controversy content from here.FriendlyFred (talk) 02:24, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done for now, both remain articles that are too detailed.FriendlyFred (talk) 03:18, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 6 external links on Chief Wahoo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:36, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Chief Wahoo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:55, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]