User talk:Hangsun.577
Welcome!
[edit]Hi Hangsun.577! I noticed your contributions to Nikole Hannah-Jones and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! Tacyarg (talk) 08:49, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
Hi there - I deleted your addition to the article on Nikole Hannah-Jones because I think it needs a better source than the two Tweets. If you can find better coverage, please do add it in again. Best wishes. Tacyarg (talk) 08:52, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
August 2020
[edit]
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Patrisse Cullors. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 09:29, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add defamatory content, as you did at Janaya Khan, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 09:31, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Ibram X. Kendi. Binksternet (talk) 09:32, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Patrisse Cullors, you may be blocked from editing without further warnings. Thank you, - FlightTime (open channel) 20:09, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. - FlightTime (open channel) 20:09, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
Join the discussion
[edit]You're not going to get anywhere trying to edit-war the changes you want. There's a lengthy discussion on Talk:Patrisse Cullors#RfC:Mentioning Marxism/Marxist? that you can join. Unless editors reach a consensus to add "Marxist" or "Marxist-trained", it's not going to be accepted in the article. Schazjmd (talk) 20:27, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
[edit]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. ▸₷truthious Ⓑandersnatch◂ 23:36, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
Important Notice
[edit]
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
—Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:17, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
August 2020
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Salvio 10:06, 23 August 2020 (UTC)January 2021
[edit]
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Martha MacCallum, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 09:50, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
Your recent edits to Martha MacCallum could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. Darren-M talk 09:28, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
Lisa D. Cook
[edit]If you continue edit warring to include poorly sourced material into this BLP, you will be blocked. You must not make your own commentary about living people based on cherry-picked tweets. Fences&Windows 23:29, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
My response to User:Fences and windows. You are a left-wing political hack. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hangsun.577 (talk • contribs)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Fences&Windows 17:58, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Marking Edits as minor
[edit]You have marked every edit you have made on Wikipedia as minor. Please familiarize yourself with Wikipeida's WP:MINOR policies. In particular, this page states, "A minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute."
You have made repeated edits to Lisa D. Cook, always marked as minor, which other editors have disagreed with. We have asked you to discuss these edits on the article's talk page before making them again. Such edits SHOULD NOT be marked as minor edits.--EAWH (talk) 00:10, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
February 2021
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. EvergreenFir (talk) 18:26, 22 February 2021 (UTC)- Also, WP:NPA violations. EvergreenFir (talk) 18:28, 22 February 2021 (UTC)