User talk:Hamtrane

Welcome!

Hi Hamtrane! I noticed your contributions to Portal:Current events and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Carter00000 (talk) 17:08, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Egide François Leemans

added a link pointing to Draughtsman

Jean Gouweloos

added a link pointing to Draughtsman

Joseph Lies

added a link pointing to Draughtsman

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox for Laura Mason

Hallo, I noticed that you added an infobox to this article, but I'm puzzled by a couple of things?

Why use {{Infobox actor}}? She wasn't an actor. Please use {{Infobox person}} unless there is an accurate specific infobox. I've corrected this.

Why add her birth and date years with "ca."? We know her exact years, in fact her exact dates: they are in the article. I've added them to the infobox, and used the fancy little template which adds her age at death.

If you do need to add "circa", please use {{circa}} or its abbreviated form {{c.}}, the official wikipedia way to do it. (See MOS:CIRCA)

If you've added any other infoboxes using "ca." when the date is exactly known and stated in the article, please consider going back and changing them. The infobox should reflect the information in the article, not be an approximation to it.

Thanks. PamD 15:11, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Hello, I'm ZimZalaBim. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Food truck have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Adding every possible variation you can come up with isn't helpful. ZimZalaBim ^talk 20:55, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Dan Green (voice actor), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 21:12, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Hello. I wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to the Welcome to the Dollhouse plot summary have been removed because they added a significant amount of unnecessary detail. Please avoid excessive detail and high word counts when editing plot summaries/synopses. You may read the plot summary edit guides to learn more about contributing constructively to plot summaries/synopses. There are also specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 00:03, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 2

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Egide François Leemans

added a link pointing to Draughtsman

Jean Gouweloos

added a link pointing to Draughtsman

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tennis Arthur for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tennis Arthur is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tennis Arthur until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

gnu 57 17:04, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Cara fame" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Cara fame has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 3 § Cara fame until a consensus is reached. ZimZalaBim ^talk 17:41, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Related to some of your discussion comments, please don't create redirects in response to crossword puzzle clues. That's not what Wikipedia is for. Thanks. --ZimZalaBim ^talk 20:13, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mp canada

A tag has been placed on Mp canada requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ZimZalaBim ^talk 13:49, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mp australia

A tag has been placed on Mp australia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ZimZalaBim ^talk 13:49, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mp new zealand

A tag has been placed on Mp new zealand requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ZimZalaBim ^talk 13:49, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects

Again, I urge you to familiarize yourself with our redirects policy as you continue to create ones that reflect implausible phrases or typos. --ZimZalaBim ^talk 13:50, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yet again, please stop making these endless implausible redirects. You are being disruptive. --ZimZalaBim ^talk 22:15, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Crazy mofo" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Crazy mofo has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 4 § Crazy mofo until a consensus is reached. Skynxnex (talk) 14:11, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Brigades of Abu Bakr Al-Sidiq" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Brigades of Abu Bakr Al-Sidiq has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 4 § Brigades of Abu Bakr Al-Sidiq until a consensus is reached. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 15:25, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"2004 fallujah bridge" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect 2004 fallujah bridge has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 4 § 2004 fallujah bridge until a consensus is reached. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 15:47, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jumping lumberjack

A tag has been placed on Jumping lumberjack requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ZimZalaBim ^talk 22:14, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kaskade i remember

A tag has been placed on Kaskade i remember requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ZimZalaBim ^talk 22:14, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Make peace with god

Hello Hamtrane,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Make peace with god for deletion, because it's a redirect that seems implausible or is an unlikely search term.

If you don't want Make peace with god to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 22:21, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 2017 trainspotting

Hello Hamtrane,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged 2017 trainspotting for deletion, because it's a redirect that seems implausible or is an unlikely search term.

If you don't want 2017 trainspotting to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 22:22, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Faye Fantarrow" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Faye Fantarrow has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 6 § Faye Fantarrow until a consensus is reached. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 22:27, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects

Please stop creating redirects that are unhelpful, misleading, or otherwise fail WP:RPURPOSE. Consider this your third warning, after ZimZalaBim's two above. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 22:28, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Bear milking" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Bear milking has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 6 § Bear milking until a consensus is reached. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 22:31, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Justin bieber confident" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Justin bieber confident has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 6 § Justin bieber confident until a consensus is reached. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 22:32, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Stefan zweig amok" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Stefan zweig amok has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 6 § Stefan zweig amok until a consensus is reached. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 22:33, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Post malone circles" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Post malone circles has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 6 § Post malone circles until a consensus is reached. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 22:33, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"2017 trainspotting" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect 2017 trainspotting has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 6 § 2017 trainspotting until a consensus is reached. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 22:35, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bezden moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Bezden. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:01, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bogyovtsi moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Bogyovtsi. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:04, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Buchin Prohod moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Buchin Prohod. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:08, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Chibaovtsi moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Chibaovtsi. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:10, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dragovishtitsa, Sofia Province moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Dragovishtitsa, Sofia Province. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:35, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gradets, Sofia Province moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Gradets, Sofia Province. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:36, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ponor, Sofia Province moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Ponor, Sofia Province. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:37, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Golyanovtsi moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Golyanovtsi. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:37, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not label chemical disambiguation pages as "core" to WikiProject Chemicals

Hello! I see you have been labeling many disambiguation pages as "core to the WikiProject Chemicals worklist" on their respective talk pages, as you have done on the talk pages of Talk:C6H7NO3S, Talk:C8H10N2O3S, Talk:C8H15NOS2, among many others. The "core" "worklist" is an archived metric for high importance articles in WikiProject Chemicals, which these disambiguation pages certainly aren't. Labeling these pages as "core" is misleading and miscategorizes them within the WikiProject, so please do not do so moving forward. Thank you! Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 06:36, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also, do not add the {{Vital article}} template to talk pages of pages that are not WP:vital articles. It seems that you may be copying these templates without knowing what their purpose is. Please stop and learn about them before continuing. --Paul_012 (talk) 14:36, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So I see the vital article tags are still there. Why is that? Hamtrane (talk) 14:38, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Because you incorrectly placed them there, and no one has gone through the effort to fix your mistakes yet. It would be appreciated if you went back to those pages and removed them yourself. --Paul_012 (talk) 14:40, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive edits

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. You really seem to be struggling with some of our core policies and making constructive contributions. I suggest you step back and go through WP:WELCOME before you make further edits. You are really starting to become quite disruptive. ZimZalaBim ^talk 17:26, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 3 marys

A tag has been placed on 3 marys requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ZimZalaBim ^talk 03:18, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jesus H. Christ, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Laypeople.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Vancouver foot

A tag has been placed on Vancouver foot requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ZimZalaBim ^talk 18:48, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Vancouver foots

A tag has been placed on Vancouver foots requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ZimZalaBim ^talk 18:48, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Vancouver feets

A tag has been placed on Vancouver feets requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ZimZalaBim ^talk 18:49, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Vancouver feet

A tag has been placed on Vancouver feet requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ZimZalaBim ^talk 18:49, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ZimZalaBim ^talk 18:55, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hamtrane - you must respond to concerns about your editing (and not just passive-aggressive responses) at the thread above. If you continue making rapid edits without consensus you will be blocked. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 19:02, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

You have been blocked from editing from certain namespaces (Portal) for a period of 24 hours for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 19:07, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sheboygan, Wisconsin

I'm not sure what this edit did. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 14:38, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) @Magnolia677: Seems like a case of WP:NOTBROKEN. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 15:07, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 17:57, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hamtrane (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Is Bb23 even an admin? I see no evidence on they userpage (it's blank)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 18:05, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

To answer, your question, yes. He could not block you otherwise. And he is an expert in detecting and blocking sock puppets. Best, -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:29, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And the user's comment/question is at best disingenuous. My userpage says clearly that I'm an administrator. In fact, because the page is otherwise empty, it stands out that much more.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:36, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

They could be on mobile, where I'm pretty sure topicons aren't visible. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 19:38, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And the administrator category at the bottom of my userpage is also not visible?--Bbb23 (talk) 19:54, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I edited my talk page today via cellphone. Ordeal.

Anyway, @Hamtrane:, I'm contemplating the fact that the havoc you wrought with your earlier account is still being cleaned up. I called upon you to recognize your errors. Instead, you created a new account and continued to wreak havoc. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:55, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 20:09, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Kasket cap" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Kasket cap has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 10 § Kasket cap until a consensus is reached. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 18:31, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Block evasion

@Edward-Woodrow: Pretty sure all these redirects qualify for WP:G5. Best, -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:35, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hm, you're right, but some of them are actually decent. Still, I'll tag the bad ones under that. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 19:36, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I am so lazy. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:44, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]