User talk:Hamad ameri

Speedy deletion of Shabia cartoon

A tag has been placed on Shabia cartoon, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Blair - Speak to me 04:07, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

July 2008

Thanks for experimenting with the page Danity Kane discography on Wikipedia. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, and has been reverted or removed. All information in the encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable published source. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. - eo (talk) 15:11, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Raven-Symoné discography‎. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. - eo (talk) 15:11, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Go Girl" (Ciara song)

Hey there, I noticed you edited the article for Ciara's "Go Girl", but failed to establish its notability. Per WP:NM, songs that have been ranked on national or significant music charts, that have won significant awards or honors or that have been performed independently by several notable artists, bands or groups are probably notable. "Go Girl" currently fails to establish notability, so should remain redirected to Fantasy Ride until then. Just a little clarification. DiverseMentality^{(Discuss it)} 17:41, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Beyoncé's untitled third studio album

I have nominated Beyoncé's untitled third studio album, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beyoncé's untitled third studio album. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Kurt Shaped Box (talk) 18:55, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speculation

Speedy deletion of Britney Spears' Sixth Studio Album

A tag has been placed on Britney Spears' Sixth Studio Album, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

This page has been created and deleted on five previous occasions

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. MrMarmite (talk) 08:31, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Sandcastle Disco"

Hey there, I noticed you edited the article for Solange's "Sandcastle Disco", but failed to establish its notability. Per WP:NM, songs that have been ranked on national or significant music charts, that have won significant awards or honors or that have been performed independently by several notable artists, bands or groups are probably notable. "Sandcastle Disco" currently fails to establish notability, so should remain redirected to Sol-Angel and the Hadley St. Dreams until then. Just a little clarification. DiverseMentality^{(Discuss it)} 21:36, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Anita...

A tag has been placed on Anita... requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Livna-Maor (talk) 15:39, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Anita...

A tag has been placed on Anita... requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Livna-Maor (talk) 16:05, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Anita..., without resolving the problem that the template refers to may be considered vandalism. Further edits of this type may result in your being blocked from editing. Livna-Maor (talk) 16:06, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Anita Williams

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Anita Williams, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Unsourced BLP, and the subject is potentially non-notable.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Livna-Maor (talk) 16:07, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Anita Williams

The Anita Williams article has been speedily deleted. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a musician, does not indicate how or why the subject is significant (along with providing reputable sources): that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's significance may be deleted at any time. Please see our inclusion criteria for musicians. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you disagree with the deletion (with evidence of the subject's significance, per our inclusion criteria, along with several reliable sources), you may request deletion review. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Aude (talk) 16:27, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

Please refrain from changing music genres without providing a source and without establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Continued genre changes to suit your own point of view may result in a block. Thank you.Candyo32 (talk) 20:17, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]