User talk:Hallieedit

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Hallieedit! Thank you for your contributions. I am Akrasia25 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Akrasia25 (talk) 20:34, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:E-flux has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:E-flux. Thanks! Fiddle Faddle 18:42, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: E-flux (June 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Scope creep were:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

The article is a rambling mess. It needs to be cut right down, and remove duplicate sections. You have timelines and projects and then you conversations, announcements. Long lists of non-notable people, addresses put in random, sections with the wrong name. It needs to be cut to about 1/3 its size. Some sections and long paragraphs have no context.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:E-flux and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:E-flux, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

scope_creep^Talk 09:27, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hallieedit! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! scope_creep^Talk 09:27, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: E-flux (September 17)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Salimfadhley was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: The article is about a temporary video store which appears to be no longer open. At the time it received some coverage in blogs and independent media, but no significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. It does not appear to be notable. This is compounded by somewhat prolix prose which has made AFC review somewhat difficult.

Salimfadhley (talk) 00:44, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On further reflection, I can see why editors are having a difficult time approving this draft. It is very difficult to determine which sources demonstrate that this subject is notable. The draft seems to describe the entire history of this organization - perhaps it's saying too much for an unpublished article. The main requirement for a draft to be approved is to demonstrate the notability of it's subject. My suggestion: If you want to get this article approved you must slim it down and write the article in such a way that allows a hurried editor to clearly understand why this subject is notable. --Salimfadhley (talk) 00:33, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]