Hello, Hakozen, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -Rholton03:24, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Selam kardeş,Türkler olarak bir grup kurdunuz mu?Siteye yeni kayıt oldum.Bana haber verirseniz iyi olur bir grup kurmayı ben de düşünüyorum.Kurabiliriz birlikte.Abi bunlar gavur ya!Birlik olalım.Cevabı ben,m kullanıcı sayfama atarsın tamam mı?İyi günler...--Edebiyataski18:54, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Bende kazanacağımızdan eminim.Tek sorun organizasyon.Ben de 2 kişiye daha teklif gönderdim.Hunlar sayfasıyla ilgili ne değiştirilmesi gerekiyorsa söyle.Benim sorunum Türk İnsanları, Kuzey Kıbrıs, Kıbrıslı Türkler, Kürtler ve Katliamlar Listesi ile ilgili ama şu anda buna gerek yok.Uygun zamanı bekleyelim.Sırf Türk olduğum için yazdığım pek çok şey değiştirildi.Haksızlık en dayanamadığım şeydir.Neyse görüşmek üzere...Saygılar. Inanna01:59, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Adana ili ilgili sayfada bir sorunum var. birkaç editor tabi kim olduklarını biliyorsunuz, ermenilerle iligi olayları uzun uzadıya anlatıryorlarken, bende adana da turklere karşı girişilen olayları belgeleriyle birlikte ekledim ancak durmadan siliyorlar. tek başıma bir etkisi olmuyor, yardımcı olursanız cok memnun olurum.
Senden bir ricam olacak. Turkish Kurdistan isimli sayfayı silip Kurds in Turkey adlı bir sayfaya yönlendirme yapılması için oy toplanıyor. Syrian Kurdistan sayfası silindi ancak Turkish Kurdistan sayfası için cok fazla kullanıcı bir araya geldi. Sende oy vermek istermisin ?
Merhaba, Kürtler sayfasında gerçekte 6 milyon olan Türkiye'de ki kürt azınlık nüfusu hiçbir kaynak göstermeden 15 milyon gibi şişirme bir rakamda tutulmak isteniyor.Rica etsem yardım edebilirmisin?
Turanians are mentioned in Sassanid records long before Turks appeared, Iran and Aniran. In addition to that Ferdowsi's Shahnameh which is a compilation of Iranian legendary stories from times of early inhabitants of Iran 4000 years (Marlik civilazation,... to Parthians and Sassanids) clearly states Turanian as Iranian nomadic tribes, native inhabitants of Central Asia. Best wishes. Amir8511:31, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'm trying to start some sort of working group to improve the coverage of Central Asia and related topics in Wikipedia. Leave a message on my userpage if you're interested. Aelfthrytha03:03, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Can you keep an eye on the Turkey article? Some anti-Turkish chauvanists are trying to insert some extremely POV sentences about Turkey's history on there, concerning armenians, the cyprus operation etc. This has been going on for some time now. Thank you.--Kilhan17:09, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hi There! Can you translate my name in what language you know please, and then post it Here. I would be very grateful if you do (if you know another language apart from English and the ones on my userpage please feel free to post it on) P.S. all th translations are in alpahbetical order so when you add one please put it in alpahbetical order according to the language. Thanks!!! Abdullah Geelah21:23, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I am collecting translations for the number 47 (forty-seven). So far I have 509 translations, which you can see here. Can you help and tell me how to say and write 47 in Sakha? I'd be most thankful; please reply on my talk page. Thank you! — N-true15:37, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:Mov11212.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:08, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. CRCulver23:34, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Thank you. This is in regard to this edit. CRCulver19:59, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, the Huns article is getting out of control in the hands of Crculver who replaces the wording to favor his pov but keeping the references contrary to his pov. This has to stop. You're cordially invited to contribute to the Huns article. Regards. E10442103:45, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not vandalize main space articles to make a point. This edit is unacceptable. You are an experienced user and know the rules. Khoikhoi09:40, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The article Turanian Army has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on ISKORPiTX, by Smylere Snape (talk·contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because ISKORPiTX seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting ISKORPiTX, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 220:49, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I respect you also and I am looking at it from a neutral view. My mothers family was from Azerbaijan enclaves until they were deported, my fathers side is from Kars until they were deported. My family has never killed a Turk; my grandfathers family was forced to move and some of there relatives were killed according to him. Those pictures have sources attached to them; Armin T. Wegner was a witness of the deportation and massacres of Armenians he has his own collection and that is why I do not dispute those. Of course the Greeks, Armenians and Kurds massacred Turks and so did the Turks on Armenians, but the Turkish massacre of Armenians were more larger and obviously considered a 'genocide'. Anyway if you know people who say Armenians killed Turks, so do Armenians who have elders say the same thing that Turks killed Armenians. You also make it sound like Armenians are the devils that we killed everyone in Turkey which is wrong. There was approximately 1-2 million Armenians in Turkey only before 1920 and today there is barely 50,000. --Vonones01:19, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yes but there were two lands of Armenia, 1. Ottoman Armenia | 2. Russian Armenia both had millions of populations the Ottomans massacred the Ottoman Armenians not the Russian Armenians. --Vonones01:33, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah... there were bombs and that could have burned them and I do not even know the source of those images. Anyway that is a different subject you are switching to. Also that is not a total lie why do you say everything is a lie if Turks killed them? but if it was a Greek or Armenian it is not a lie? are you a historian? really its kind of obvious you are not neutral on the subject. --Vonones01:59, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry about disappearing there. Anyway, it doesn't seem to be that big a deal of it only being mentioned in the article. I might be wrong though, since I don't understand the conflict, other than the fact that it's been a large one on here. You can point i tout on the talk page, but it's nearly time for that section to be updated, so it will be removed shortly anyway.
Just to point out, I'm not the one that chooses the articles that go on the main page. Wizardman02:06, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Huns. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. --Vonones02:43, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for harassing other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Mr.Z-mantalk¢03:26, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
user Vonones who is in a pure anti-turkic personality attack the "turkic history" pages of wikipedia, (see the Huns page), he is an armenian user and hate all the turkish people(he always edit with no written source). he uses 3RR rule throug to his nationalist and racist ideals. how can i stop him? thanks.--hakozen03:05, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Well... I have no clue how you can use the 3RR to do what you say he's doing. If he's violating it, report him... but I would suggest discussing rather than reverting -- get the page protected if there's a revert war, and talk on the talk page. Also... don't spam user's talk pages. Gscshoyru16:20, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hakozen you left a comment in my talk page which was childish. Let me explain to you, I don't see any thing funny with editing the article and secondly by editing the Ordu article that does not mean that I am trying to take back the city which is what you wrote in my talk page. I am editing the article because the information that you are deleting is referenced and the truth. ROOB32323:56, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for edit-warring on various articles. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.
It's obvious you're only here to push your nationalist POV into our encyclopedia. Any language Wikipedia is not the place to continue to fight idiotic internet wars over real life historical conflicts. If you want to edit constructively, then request that you be unblocked and give us a damn good reason why we should let you edit despite your hundred Turkish messages to editors to assist you in whatever nonsense you want to bring onto our website.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 06:04, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
He mentions that Armenians on wiki have gone too far with vandalisms, and asks for being organized against them, and repulse those attacks using the listed methods. A block might be in place, I am not sure about an indef block. If being a POV pusher is enough reason for indef block, I will keep that in mind. DenizTC06:31, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hakozen - I do not speak Turkish - so as much as I appreciate the message you left for me on my user page, my feeble attempts at using free online translators leave me at a blank for understanding the wording of your message. If Denizz or someone could assist me, I could understand it more and properly address any concerns or questions you may have. Thank you. Rarelibra13:10, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Huns. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. --Vonones 02:43, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
