User talk:Hadiyo1997

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. — CharlotteWebb 05:59, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kismayo image

You said the photo was taken by your brother, but you didn't supply the license information. Please supply this information, or else the image will be deleted from Wikipedia as being unfree. See Wikipedia:Image use policy for some ideas on different licenses. — ዮም | (Yom) | Talk • contribs • Ethiopia 05:23, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Kismayo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Kismayo.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:34, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Bariis.idolashiilay3.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Bariis.idolashiilay3.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:52, 8 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 04:52, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Publisher and books

We are having considerable difficulty in verifying the material for Salaam Press and the books it publishes, I can very well understand why there would be difficulties for these, but we do need some actualy evidence from outside the company that the books are in fact known, are in libraries somewhere, and have been reviewed by some publications. Could you please give us whatever details you can. I will try to adjust the articles so they can be kept, but I may have to merge them into a smaller number of articles. I am not even completely clear what language the books are actually published in. As an administrator here who frequently works with articles on books, I will do what I can, but this is a subject where finding the necessary information is up to you. Any language will do, but if not in English, please provide translations of the key parts that would show the notability. It might be easier if you kept me in touch with the progress you are making on this page--I'll check it every day or two. DGG (talk) 05:18, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rahal X

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Rahal X, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Notability not established through reliable sources.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Wizardman 15:51, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

Hi, I noticed that you added File:Rebound2009.jpg to the Afdhere Jama article. Given the rules of fair use, we can't use that image because the article isn't about that film. (However, it's OK to use it in Rebound (2009 film), which is about the film.) Thanks, -- Gyrofrog (talk) 18:11, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rebound (2009 film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rebound (2009 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rebound (2009 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BOVINEBOY2008 00:31, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rebound2009.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rebound2009.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:01, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Khalil and Majnun

The article Khalil and Majnun has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

NN book, meets none of the criteria of WP:NBOOK. Fails the GNG going away. Article has been notability tagged for over a decade, and the publisher seems long defunct as well.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ravenswing 01:14, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Salaam Press

The article Salaam Press has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

NN publishing company, fails the GNG and WP:ORG. All links dead, official site dead, no substantive coverage in reliable sources found. Article notability tagged for over a decade.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ravenswing 01:15, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Khalil and Majnun for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Khalil and Majnun is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khalil and Majnun until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lightburst (talk) 23:18, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Huriyah (magazine)

The article Huriyah (magazine) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Insubstantial stub with no reliable sourcing about a possibly self-published work

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Iskandar323 (talk) 14:28, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Illegal Citizens

The article Illegal Citizens has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Insubstantial stub with no reliable sourcing about a possibly self-published work

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Iskandar323 (talk) 14:30, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]