Talk:Huriyah (magazine)

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

LGBTQ+ studies

This redirect is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles

United States

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.

United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles

discussion

i like what you are trying to do but this needs more data and links. please correct expand and remove the deletion link once you have done so. also dont add vulger language to the article. Maverick423 15:18, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot find any vulgar language in this article. Please explain. Your deletion nomination also breaks WP:FAITH Lurker ^oi! 15:22, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"queer magazine" is offencive to some people. i suggest a reword if you are going to add something like this. Maverick423 15:29, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The magazine describes itself as "queer", which is a much-used term. If wikipedia can have an article on Queer Eye, it can describe a magazine which self-identifies as queer using this term. Oh, and your deletion nomination still alleges "Editor clearly made this article to add nonsence.", which breaks WP:FAITH. Lurker ^oi! 15:36, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

so i see. i really never heard the word queer other then to offend people therefor i thought it was doing just that. as for WP:FAITH i do belive i did act to hasty. well then if there are no more arguments i will remove the AFD proposal. i assume you agree with this desision as well. Maverick423 15:41, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Thank you. The article could do with expansion, but as I hadn't heard of it until I found this article while newpage patrolling, I can't add much more in the way of info. Lurker ^oi! 15:45, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

same here but im sure there is a project out there that can take it under its wing. ill see what i can do to fix this article up a bit maybe add some more links or something. Maverick423 15:47, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Huriyah (magazine). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070226195743/http://www.huriyahmag.com:80/ to http://www.huriyahmag.com

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:30, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]