User talk:Hacrv76765
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NAMTA until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Bearcat (talk) 15:40, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 15:45, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
Hacrv76765 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Dear @Bbb23: and Wikipedia Administrators,
I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to appeal the block on my account "Hacrv76765" due to suspected sockpuppetry with my previous account "Songangte". I would like to provide some context and clarity on the matter:
Retiring "Songangte": I chose to retire my account "Songangte" primarily due to privacy concerns. I wanted a fresh start with "Hacrv76765" without carrying forward any associations from my old account. This decision was not made to evade scrutiny or manipulate any Wikipedia guidelines.
Creating the User Page for "Songangte": The action where "Hacrv76765" tried to create a user page for "Songangte" was a genuine oversight on my part. My intention was to provide a note linking back to my retired account for transparency. In hindsight, I understand how this could be perceived as suspicious, and I deeply regret not being clearer in my actions.
Commitment to Wikipedia's Integrity: I value Wikipedia's policies and principles. My decision to retire and create a new account was in no way an attempt to deceive the community or misuse the platform. I genuinely believed I was acting in line with Wikipedia's best practices by retiring an account and starting fresh, particularly when the previous username posed privacy concerns for me. You may note that all of my edits are legitimate and with valid sources and I have not engaged in any vandalism or warring.
I kindly request the Wikipedia Administrators to consider my appeal and the context provided. I understand the importance of ensuring the platform's integrity, and I assure you that my intentions have always been genuine and in the best interest of the Wikipedia community. In the future, I commit to being even more diligent in my actions and ensuring full transparency to prevent any misunderstandings.
Thank you for taking the time to review my appeal. I truly appreciate your understanding and patience in this matter.
Warm regards, Hacrv76765
Decline reason:
Your retirement was considered to be "under a cloud". Vanishing as you did is typically only done for users who don't intend to return; the word "retirement" also suggests that you were not returning- if you intended to start a new account due to privacy issues, there are ways to do that that don't involve retirement. 331dot (talk) 09:34, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hello, Hacrv76765
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username MPGuy2824, and I thank you for your contributions.
I wanted to let you know, however, that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Pramot Singh, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. To prevent the deletion, please add a reference to the article. You may remove the deletion tag yourself once the article has at least one reliable source.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
-MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:36, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Meitei Leepun
[edit]Hello Hacrv76765,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Meitei Leepun for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
-MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:37, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Kuki Rebellion of 1917-1919
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Kuki Rebellion of 1917-1919, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It is an "attack page" or an unsourced biography of a living person that is entirely negative in tone. (See section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)
Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity, or articles about living people that are entirely negative and unsourced. Attack pages, attack files and negative unreferenced BLPs are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing - It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kautilya3 (talk) 13:27, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:North American Manipur Tribal Association Logo May 2023.png
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:North American Manipur Tribal Association Logo May 2023.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 12 August 2023 (UTC)