User talk:Hacker-index

Jika anda tidak sanggup untuk melakukan blocked or Deletion or janga blokir setiap pengguna yang memiliki Copyright,pembuat akun --Hacker-index (talk) 18:27, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi Hacker-index! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! -- Fyrael (talk) 15:00, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ucapan terima kasih,🎭untuk saran ada Fyrael untu halaman pembicaraan Wikipedia-Hacker-index (talk) 17:29, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail

Hello, Hacker-index. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.Hacker-index (talk) 12:28, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove comments made by other editors

At 17:03, 4 January 2021 (UTC), you removed a comment from the Wikipedia Teahouse that was made by another editor.[1]

Please do not do that.

I have restored it.[2] davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 🎄 16:01, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Maaf saya salah ketik ,terimakasih atas bantuanya davidwr mohon di ingatkan lagi--Hacker-index (talk) 16:07, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I do not speak Indonesian. I had to run that through a machine-translator. The translation said "Sorry I made a typo, thank you for the help davidwr, please remind me again".

This is the English Wikipedia. Very few of us read Indonesian. In the future, please use English on the English Wikipedia unless you are communicating directly with someone you know will understand you if you use Indonesian.

I see that you have been blocked on the Indonesian Wikipedia because your username violates their username policy. Instructions for requesting a global name change are at Wikipedia:Username change. The equivalent page on the Indonesian Wikipedia is id:Wikipedia:Pengubahan nama pengguna. Since the name change will be "global" you can follow either set of instructions. Make sure the new name you request complies with the username policy or equivalent on each Wikipedia/Wikimedia project you intend on editing. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 🎄 16:45, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I understand your english,and the input on Wikipedia please cooperate until later davidwr I will fix the Copyright or user--Hacker-index (talk) 17:14, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits to Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Redirects and categories have been reverted

That page is for the specific purpose of asking that a redirect or category be created. Your edits gave sources, targets, reasons for creation, and sources that didn't make sense. Your first requested that unblock be created as a redirect to Administrator with the stated reason of Copyright, citing Vandalism as the source. Your second requested that pembajakan be created as a redirect to Administrator with the stated reason of Vandalism with "pembajakan" listed as a source. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 🎄 19:10, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's not like that goal,it's just when I'd ends-Hacker-index (talk) 23:01, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021: You are editing disruptively on Wikipedia

If you are a bot, as you claim to be, who is operating you?, as I have an important message for you. You refuse to communicate in English on English Wikipedia, ignore and blank communications from other users concerning your editing behavior, and are overly active on Talk pages which have no relation to your editing.

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. --Quisqualis (talk) 21:52, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Hacker-index: You must find something useful to do. Any further test edits will result in a block. Johnuniq (talk) 00:54, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for you inconvenience--Hacker-index (talk) 12:02, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Hacker-index: I see you are now making posts to Wikipedia policy or guidance talk pages, but none of them make any sense to me. I assume that English is not your first language? Are you aware there is a Wikipedia that matches your main language? You might like to see https://www.wikipedia.org/ to find one that suits your abilities and interests better. Meanwhile please do not post to these Talk pages unless you genuinely have something you need to say or ask. You are extremely close to being blocked for disruptive editing. Nick Moyes (talk) 16:11, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for my mistake on the talk page--Hacker-index (talk) 16:23, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent incomprehensible editing. I'm sorry, but a certain ability to communicate is required here. Please edit the Wikipedia in your native language instead. Please read Davidwr's instructions above for how to change your username on the Indonesian Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | tålk 17:34, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

sorry for my discussion mistake--Hacker-index (talk) 17:54, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

N.B.: Reportedly, this editor is blocked on the Indonesian Wikipedia.--Quisqualis (talk) 18:12, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

on the border there is a mouse path--Hacker-index (talk) 18:19, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Talk about policy please do not abuse it message Bishonen from talk what--Hacker-index (talk) 19:00, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is yet another incomprehensible response. I fear there is simply a language issue here, and that English language version of Wikipedia will never suit you. Sorry about that, but there are other language version you are probably able to contribute to more effectively than this one. Nobody should be ashamed of their native language; I know I would be blocked for lack of understanding if I tried to edit any other language of Wikipedia. Nick Moyes (talk) 13:36, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hacker-index (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

my conversation only wants to propose a discussion not to damage, if my discussion is destructive, please delete it--Hacker-index (talk) 15:59, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 16:29, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock

Unblock--Hacker-index (talk) 09:44, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Hacker-index: this is not a valid unblock request. If you genuinely wish to be unblocked on this language of Wikipedia, you will need not only to read, but also to follow, the guidance at Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks, then you would need to put clearly and cogently your reasons for why you believe it would be appropriate for that block to be removed, whilst at the same time explaining how you would change your editing pattern so that you would not be risking getting blocked again. Nick Moyes (talk) 13:30, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are not permitted to remove (or edit) declined unblock requests for your currently active block. Please do not do so again. You are welcome to remove all other content from this page if you wish. --Yamla (talk) 17:09, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks--_{Hacker-index@enwiki} 17:12, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

#10295297

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hacker-index (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

10295297

Decline reason:

As you are only posting nonsense I have removed your ability to edit this page. — O Still Small Voice of Clam 18:43, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Block Bishonen

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Stop it

It's not clear what you are trying to do, but it's inappropriate. Stop it. You have access to this talk page solely so you can make an unblock request. WP:GAB explains how. You will lose access to your talk page if you continue messing around. --Yamla (talk) 18:03, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks _Duta2000®talk 20:27, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User talk:Hacker-index/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User talk:Hacker-index/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:17, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of User talk:Hacker-index/sandbox

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page User talk:Hacker-index/sandbox has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to have no meaningful content or history, and the text was unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review Vanjagenije (talk) 22:17, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]