User talk:Habibian2013

Welcome

Hello, Habibian2013, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Dismas|^(talk) 21:13, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory Help directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Proposed deletion of South India Derby

The article South India Derby has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

clearly fails WP:NOT. These two teams are not even a year old. How does practically a non-existent rivalry deserve a page?

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Coderzombie (talk) 20:30, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sulaiman Markhor

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Sulaiman Markhor, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.scirecordbook.org/sulaiman-markhor/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:01, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Sulaiman Markhor

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Sulaiman Markhor. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Kabul markhor. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Kabul markhor – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Wilbysuffolk (Talk to me!) 17:17, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts and copyright violations. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. MER-C 03:48, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Remove the block

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Habibian2013 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

HI MER-C Its good that you take care of copyright violation but I never had any account associated with wikipedia except for this one. Maybe somehow my work might resemble to the blocked user bur it's my first ever wikipedia account. I've been informed that my work on Sind krait resembled to a blocked user so I might agree with it cause there is only one website which has given extended information on Sind krait maybe we both have gone through the same website otherwise we surely have no link. I hope you'll understand. Habibian2013 (talk) 13:17, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I have examined the editing history of the two accounts. Contrary to what you seem to think, the connections between the accounts are by no means limited to the editing of the one article you mention, but are very widespread. There are, in fact, so many coincidences that to believe that the two are unconnected would be astoundingly naive. I also note that your unblock request made no attempt whatever to address the copyright issue. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 16:00, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Wiki Sucks Everyone out there using wikipedia is a son a slut. fuck off morons. IM\'m not associated with Haffy8891. Habibian2013 (talk) 21:50, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can You Please Tell Me When Would I Be Unblock

It's a real coincidence that the two account have same editings. almost same ones. There is 7 billion people in this globe and two people mentality can e same. I'm in no association with that account. Sorry for abusive language. Habibian2013 (talk) 13:43, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nene derby for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nene derby is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nene derby until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk) 10:43, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Maha Derby

The article Maha Derby has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable Derby. One of the teams has disbanded

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Coderzombie (talk) 06:27, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Goa Derby

The article Goa Derby has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Is there enough to show that this "rivalry" meets WP:GNG?

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ArsenalFan700 (talk) 17:05, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]