User talk:HQEditor

Welcome

Hello, HQEditor, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Dougweller (talk) 18:19, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

HQEditor, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi HQEditor! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:15, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Hello HQEditor, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your addition to Al-Fatiha has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied without attribution. If you want to copy from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dougweller (talk) 17:53, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Dougweller for the detailed guidance! Although I read a few guidelines of how to edit WP, I had completely missed that we cannot copy-paste :). It'd take some time to get used to editing WP.

I've tried to follow the guidelines this time and added back the material in Al Fatiha, only this time its para-phrased rather than copy-paste. I've not restored material that was not appropriately cited or had other problems. HQEditor (talk) 15:27, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine. We have a pretty strict policy on copyvio although it is not easy to keep on top of it, and I am regularly (well, almost monthly) running across editors who have been violating it for years. Dougweller (talk) 17:26, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Al-Nas

Also reverted you here. I can see that you are trying very hard to be a good editor, but you need to be more careful - I've given you details above. By the way, user Followerofquran hasn't edited for over a year. The copyvio is still in your sandbox. Let me know if you want any advice or help. Dougweller (talk) 18:23, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Project Quran

Hi it is really nice to see that this project kicking making some progress after 3 years since it was created. Please let me know if I can be of any help. NëŧΜǒńğer^{Talk to me} 11:14, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Zahid Saeed (industrialist) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zahid Saeed (industrialist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zahid Saeed (industrialist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Saqib (talk) 06:23, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Saqib for your value addition to WP! I've just added three more references of press coverage of Zahid Saeed, as part of the WP:Politician 's policy that if the person has received significant press coverage, s/he could be considered for an article. HQEditor (talk) 14:07, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hafiz Naeem Ur Rehman (March 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hafiz Naeem Ur Rehman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hafiz Naeem Ur Rehman, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 02:39, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hafiz Naeem Ur Rehman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hafiz Naeem Ur Rehman, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

1292simon (talk) 10:53, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Hafiz Naeem Ur Rehman

Hello, HQEditor. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hafiz Naeem Ur Rehman".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:54, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zahid Saeed (June 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheAafi was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zahid Saeed and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Zahid Saeed, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

─ The Aafī ^{^(talk)} 17:37, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 06:30:29, 18 June 2022 for assistance on AfC submission by HQEditor

HQEditor (talk · contribs)
- User:HQEditor (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Salam TheAafi! BRecorder is a reputed news outlet, and the article referred to is mainly covering the subject (Zahid Saeed) and not just mentioning him as a passing remark, right? Please guide if that's not the case, pls guide with an example as to which article would be considered to have met above criterion and which not... Thanks!

HQEditor (talk) 06:30, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Zahid Saeed

Hello, HQEditor. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Zahid Saeed, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:01, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Zahid Saeed

Hello, HQEditor. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Zahid Saeed".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 18:07, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]