User talk:HOA101

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for your work on improving the Cushitic People article! Eridian314 (talk) 15:05, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Careful with ref names

Hi! Your edit here introduced a duplicate ref name error. (Search for 'error:' in the revisions before and after your edit.) I have since fixed this error. --Palosirkka (talk) 09:27, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Cushitic peoples into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Austronesier (talk) 08:04, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm HaeB. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Pogrom, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. HaeB (talk) 19:23, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021 - ethnocracy

I noticed that you placed a reference to ethnocracy on the Ethiopia page. You provided a source, but this source (Wimmer) really makes no such claim, which is why I removed it from this and some other pages. On the Neftenya page I was aware that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Constantly reverting someone else's edits without even giving an edit summary is considered very poor behavior on Wikipedia. I will continue to watch the Neftenya page - if you don't change your behavior for the better, it will lead to consequences. Landroving Linguist (talk) 08:30, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm concerned that you have not replied to Landroving Linguist's comment above and also reverted to an earlier version of our article in this edit without providing either a reason or a any clue why in an edit summary. BushelCandle (talk) 20:55, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We've already discussed this on a different talk page, I don't remember which one, but this is old news and we've already solved it. HOA101 (talk) 21:34, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That may well be the case that you have resolved matters with Landroving Linguist but you definitely have not resolved matters (never mind engaged in dialogue) with me. However, I do see that your alternative account is now using edit summaries, which is a huge improvement. On a lighter note, I do hope that spring has now sprung in Toronto... BushelCandle (talk) 21:59, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just incase you don't get my message at Talk:Tigray War: What alternative accounts are you talking about? I don't have any others, this is it. HOA101 (talk) 23:08, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Report moved to WP:ANI

Hi HOA101, your report has been moved to WP:ANI#MfactDr reported by HOA101, which is a more suitable location for reports that require more than a few words. Please join the discussion and provide diff links. Best regards, ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:15, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop vandalising 2016 Oromo protests

Hi HOA101, Please abstain yourself from unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as Most of your edit reverted by other senior editors in many article. as you did it here and here to the 2016 Oromo protests. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. Please do not vandalize the article without source. Again you repeatedly changing contents without source over and over its unacceptable! If you would like to do some experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. MfactDr (talk) 23:45, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Hello, I'm Boud. Your recent edit(s) appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Here are some cases of recent additions of information absent from the sources:

claim of TPLF links that is not present in the source, 17:12, 27 March 2021
claim of TPLF links by one group and absence of TPLF by another group, when neither claim is present in the source, 23:23, 27 March 2021‎

Boud (talk) 02:16, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Rsk6400 (talk) 18:01, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. MfactDr (talk) 07:16, 6 April 2021 (UTC) to do so.[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Hoaeter per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hoaeter. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 06:33, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Afro-Asiatic Peoples

Template:Afro-Asiatic Peoples has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:43, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]