User talk:HM7Me

Welcome!

Hello, HM7Me, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! JarrahTree 23:44, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 13:58, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mafalda, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Mafalda was changed by HM7Me (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.871054 on 2020-10-03T15:31:34+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:31, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Quino. AviationFreak💬 22:51, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Mafalda, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Ktin (talk) 23:15, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Quino, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Ktin (talk) 01:42, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Quino, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Ktin (talk) 01:55, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Lofty abyss 01:59, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are not acting as intellectuals and contributors Why not create a section like 'controversial views' Why don't you help me instesd of authoritarianly menacing me from not expressing authentic ideas and labelling me a vandal? Is there absolutely no relevance in my text? Who are you? God? The result is wikipedia becomes irrelevant, like gossip magazines HM7Me (talk) 02:01, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Such a section can be created but it needs to be referenced and neutral (non-opinionated). Also, if someone disagrees with the edits it would be better to discuss it. Lofty abyss 02:04, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I understand and respecf your contribution and wijipedia. I need wikipedia. I just meant to suggest. obs. I may have used rather innapropriate/passionate discourse and apologise. HM7Me (talk) 18:39, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Forgive my typos HM7Me (talk) 18:42, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Embraer C-390 Millennium. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. MilborneOne (talk) 17:17, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of two weeks for edit warring, as you did at Embraer C-390 Millennium. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. MilborneOne (talk) 18:27, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]