User talk:HK51

This is a Wikipedia user talk page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:HK51.

Please click here to leave me a new message.

Archives

April 2006-February 2007

Portal:AC/DC

Hey, nice job with the portal! No-Bullet (Talk • Contribs) 02:10, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm sorry I didn't answered before, I was on vacations. I'll be glad to help you but I'm not sure if you have done them already, so keep me posted. Cheers. No-Bullet (Talk • Contribs) 23:36, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:ACDC banner.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:ACDC banner.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 08:09, 16 February 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey 08:09, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Each of the images in the banner needs a source and license, if You are unable to do that then it is deleted. Also if even one of the images is fair use. feydey 12:38, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WHAT ARE YOU TALKNING ABOUT?????????????????

What non-sense am I adding to the m-80 page? You were the one who keep's deleting silver salute a.k.a. ashcan, and my pictures of salutes, and writing inappropriate things such as "juicybutts".

Let me ask you a question, how old are dude, because I really want to know and tell me the truth too? Are you just bord unemployed and have nothing better to do 8:30am but rewrite everybody's work on here or what. I want you to name one thing that I have writen that is nonsense. Who put you in charge to be moderator anyway?

Don't bitch out, write me back! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.169.47.173 (talk) 08:39, 22 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Kath article

Dear Sir:

I am simply adding badly missing content (early career) to the Kath wik page. The material I have used is practically word-for-word from the referenced source (www.timmwood/mystics The Mystics - Terry Kath's first rock band). Your friends are not editing, but for some strange reason preventing the development of the Kath page. This amounts to bullying. Please help me...I would be most appreciative. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mastersman (talk • contribs) 20:24, 24 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

The above referenced source contains pictures of Kath as well....can you ask for a more solid reference than that? Once again, your help would be most appreciated. Mastersman 20:35, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I added a reminder about Wiki-policy to the above editors talkpage. I also included a note about adding "word-for-word" copyvio content. I have setup a report to administration about the multiple policy breaking...including a possible sockpuppet IP request about the user due to the similarities to previous IP vandalism to the same article. If I submit the reports perhaps you could add comment. 216.21.150.44 20:42, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

But the word-for-word material is ***REFERENCED***....there is therefore no violation!!! You seem to be struggling for an argument to prevent the development of the Kath page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.150.49.50 (talk) 21:03, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And why are your friends preventing the development of the Kath page anonymously (hiding their identity)? Maybe they realize what they are doing is wrong. Mastersman 21:42, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The referenced article is written by journalist Tim Wood and is not a fansite. Mastersman 21:47, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

commons:User:HK51

I assert to be the same user as commons:User:HK51. ĤĶ51→^Łalk 22:53, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

problems

bad news. someone deleted that ac/dc lineup picture due to copyright infringment. i don't get it. i got permission from the site, read the WP:C guideline, and i'm screwed. i'm not very good. Jailbreaker22 13:48, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

Glad to see you back :) No-Bullet (Talk • Contribs) 18:38, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

News

Just to let you know, there is now a Wikipedia:WikiProject Motörhead.--Alf ^melmac 18:39, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome Back

Just to say welcome back to wiki, did you get good results yesterday? Anyway keep up the good work wikifying those articles. mickyfitz13 ^Talk 10:43, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FAR

AC/DC has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 03:40, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Whitesnake-logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Whitesnake-logo.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Crstsk (talk) 01:09, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Rock music Newsletter for October 2008

The Rock music WikiProject Newsletter
Issue 9 - October 2008

"As long as my face is on page one, I don't care what they say about me on page seventeen."- Mick Jagger
Project news

The project has a total of 106 GAs and 91 Featured Articles and Lists put together.
We collaborated on Soul Bomb.
Help us select good versions of WP:ROCK articles for inclusion on the Wikipedia 0.7 release! Find out more about Wikipedia 0.7 selection on the project talk page and add your thoughts to the discussion. If you are personally responsible for a Featured or Good Article listed here, please the select a version to include in Wikipedia 0.7 on that page if you haven't already. Page versions must be selected by October 20.
The genres in infobox fields have been removed cause of the discussion found here Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Music#Time to remove genre section on info box?. You can provide any opinions you may have about this.
This month's "Recommended Rock Album" is Soundgarden - Superunknown (1994).

Editors

User:Be Black Hole Sun

Be Black Hole Sun (talk · contribs)

GA reassessment of Bon Scott

I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. You are being notified as you have made a number of contributions to the article. I have found some concerns which you can see at Talk:Bon Scott/GA1. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:19, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]