User talk:H3sam91
Welcome!
[edit]
Hello, H3sam91, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Simplified Manual of Style
- Your first article
- Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
- Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
- and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Steve Quinn (talk) 17:54, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
AN/I
[edit]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. - LuckyLouie (talk) 15:00, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- well it wasn't unexpected that you would do this since your logic is so strong and you are definitely not triggered and upset. definitely adult behaviour. H3sam91 (talk) 15:16, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
July 2023
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Courcelles (talk) 15:07, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
H3sam91 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
not sure why I'm being being banned indefinitely for unreasonable reasons. I'm not sure how I have made "significant disruption" to warrant this. I have only added an article to help in the TALK page. I have made zero edits to the main Grusch article without concensus. these kinds of bans drive away potential editors such as mine. I have made good contributions to wikipedia. my ban should be explained or I should be unbanned so I can contribute to wikipedia. I am being singled out for no reason. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Disruptive_editing quote: " If an editor treats situations that are not clearly vandalism as such, that editor may harm the encyclopedia by alienating or driving away potential editors." H3sam91 (talk) 15:14, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Your contribution history shows no evidence that you are a constructive editor. I could imagine an unblock with a topic ban on David Grusch or perhaps some subject area substantially broader, but I see no path forward otherwise. Yamla (talk) 16:52, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
H3sam91 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
@Yamla: sure I'm ok with that. you can block me from Grush and UFO topic or even any fringe topics. I already made my point and I see no need to make any comments to Dave Grush story anymore. Also it's become abundantly clear that some editors are protected by admins 100%, no one can dare cause any discomfort for them, and the book is thrown at them, even when there is zero violations from any wikipedia rules. I can't change that and I'm not going to try anymore. If the admins are not worried about wikipedia reputation being obliterated by these narrow-minded and exclusionary policies, why should I? being from Iran I'm more than faimliar with regular censorship and thought police. what could go wrong? H3sam91 (talk) 17:28, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
WP:NOTTHEM and WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS. I see no path forward for you; a topic ban would not be sufficient. Bbb23 (talk) 18:07, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
H3sam91 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
oh so there's no path forward for me?! I'm going to start crying now. I'm not sure why you're so obsessed with me and talk as if you're a judge. maybe someone should decide that's less invested in this and less triggered by opposing views? regardless you can feel free to block me a feel empowered by this great power you have. maybe get a real job and take some chill pill. H3sam91 (talk) 18:34, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Not an unblock request. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 22:22, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- TPA (predictably) revoked.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:36, 4 July 2023 (UTC)