User talk:H2g2bob/Archive 4

Welcome to CCISTF!

Welcome H2g2bob, to the WikiProject Computing/Computer and Information Security task force! I wanted to stop by and say hello, as well as find out if there are any specific articles you are looking at within our scope. I am always avalible for comment, and I look forward to getting to know you! Oh, and I'm a budding Linux user myself. Fedora:P —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sephiroth storm (talk • contribs) 12:34, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WPB to WPBS

Hi,

We're not really supposed to change WPB to WPBS on pages without consensus. It avoids arguments. Mind changing it back ? :) Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 19:53, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Left Reply WP:CCISTF

I've left my reply to your thoughts. blurpeace ^{(talk - contributions)} 00:31, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

a question... and greetings....

Dear David, what about upgrading your Unplug firefox addson? it is not available for the last Firefox release... It would be great... Have an HAPPY NEW YEAR Mara form Italy —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.41.21.99 (talk) 12:51, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Request to move article Richard Wilson (Scottish actor) incomplete

You recently filed a request at Wikipedia:Requested moves to move the page Richard Wilson (Scottish actor) to a different title - however your proposal is either incomplete or has been contested as being controversial. As a result, it has been moved to the incomplete and contested proposals section. Requests that remain incomplete after five days will be removed.

Please make sure you have completed all three of the following:

Added {{move|NewName}} at the top of the talk page of the page you want moved, replacing "NewName" with the new name for the article. This creates the required template for you there.
Added a place for discussion at the bottom of the talk page of the page you want to be moved. This can easily be accomplished by adding {{subst:RMtalk|NewName|reason for move}} to the bottom of the page, which will automatically create a discussion section there.
Added {{subst:RMlink|PageName|NewName|reason for move}} to the top of today's section here.

If you need any further guidance, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Requested moves or contact me on my talk page. - JPG-GR (talk) 03:03, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CSEC

H2g2bob! Thank You for your assistance with the WikiProject Computing/Computer and Information Security task force! We thank you for all of your hard work, and we would like to invite you to our new Wikiproject at WikiProject Computer Security. We hope to see you soon! Sephiroth storm (talk) 08:21, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Eva cross explosion.png

Thanks for uploading File:Eva cross explosion.png. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 00:43, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Christmas broadcast 1957.png

Thanks for uploading File:Christmas broadcast 1957.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:58, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Money.ogg

Hi, I've been working on the The Dark Side of the Moon article which is currently at GAN, and wondered if you would mind if I replaced your upload with my own? The reason being that the licence won't really allow two versions to co-exist (one will have to be deleted), and the two samples I've uploaded to the article are from the same album, and therefore amplitude matched. Drop me a line on my talk page, let me know what you think. I'll probably upload a third track, "Us and Them" maybe. Parrot of Doom (talk) 20:25, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Dark Side of the Moon Money.ogg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Dark Side of the Moon Money.ogg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Parrot of Doom (talk) 16:30, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Gratefuldead logo.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Gratefuldead logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:59, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Music samples

Hi. I noticed you've participated in discussions at the music samples guideline's talk page, and I was wondering if you'd like to weigh in on my proposal regarding sample lengths. Thanks. Tim meh 01:41, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jack straw

is not a jew, please see beganlocals talk page, the blair quote needs to be stronger. ThanksUser_talk:Beganlocal (Off2riorob (talk) 19:25, 12 July 2009 (UTC))[reply]

I like your progamming work, respect. (Off2riorob (talk) 19:28, 12 July 2009 (UTC))[reply]

You're right, of course. It seemed like a good source until I read it properly. I notice the source for this in Labour Friends of Israel also fails on closer inspection. --h2g2bob (talk) 19:33, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, I am exausted with the british political articles here. (Off2riorob (talk) 19:39, 12 July 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Jeremy Browne MP

It seems another attempt has been made to censor this page by removing inconvenient details.

I attempted to put things back but as a write of narrative verse and not a computer person I may hve done somenting that would not meet with your approvel although it look alright to me

Verthandi —Preceding unsigned comment added by Verthandi (talk • contribs) 12:17, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is that narrative verse? It looks like a load of illiterate cobblers to me. Still, fight the good fight, mate. --OhNoPeedyPeebles (talk) 11:19, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am finding that H2g2bob has a track record of deleting inconvenient details of MPs - not matter how true, or backed up by external source material. Is there something that can be done about such blatant abuse? Md010101 (talk) 17:47, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Provide the script for Deletionpedia?

Have you considered sharing the script used for exporting articles from Wikipedia to Deletionpedia? I would be very interested in this. You are welcome to email me. Rumpsenate (talk) 05:55, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lancaster

Has now been revisited contrary to consensus on the prurient stuff. Collect (talk) 14:52, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with deleting overly prurient personal stuff, but the expenses stuff should (surely) be there. And I'm not a sock puppet, I'm a human being! - MPhammer —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mphammer (talk • contribs) 15:22, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just a reminder...

Please watch for vandals deleting requests to Wikify the article /Gregoire_Seither. Someone deleted yours from last November without adding any in-line citations as requested by one of the templates you requested; today I've added Notability & No footnotes templates. Appears to be a "vanity" page for self-promotion of his arts/activism; at least some of the groups he's a part of also had WP articles created about them w/out inline citations, but at least look like notable groups (covered in press, albeit fringe publications). Please either check each 6 months or so (it took someone approx that long to delete your templates, which were 100% justified), or I'll leave it up to you since you're more experienced on WP editing than me: Should it be deleted _immediately_ as it's a living person?24.155.205.244 (talk) 10:59, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sion Simon

H2 - why do you continually delete a version of Sion Simon's page? If you watch the linked source, you'll find that he actually says what is quoted in the article.

By deleting without confirming the source - which you clearly have not, otherwise it is abundantly obvious - seems to imply a political bias in your deletions. I hope not. Md010101 (talk) 17:47, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Margaret Beckett MP

You have added a ^[who?] tag into the MPs expenses section where I state that she is widely considered to be impenitent about her expenses. The previous section contains a description of - and link to - her Question Time appearance in which she condemned herself by her own statements and behaviour. The Sunday Times article of 23/08/2009 further reinforces that widespread impression of her views and attitude.

I daresay that if I look hard and long enough I can find a published article in which the words "arrogant" and "impenitent" appear.They certainly do in the comments to the online articles. Roaringboy 08:03, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Mark Lazarowicz

Hi - not sure how to proceed further with the editor who keeps reverting the Expenses Scandal info; seems it may actually be someone who works for him. Little grape (talk) 14:05, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

He's back. No surprise I suppose. Little grape (talk) 16:33, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

British MPs

Does your bounty award still stand? I'd be happy to improve up to ten articles. Let me know if this offer still stands and I'll see what I can do. Himalayan 10:26, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Paddy's Girl

Hi Dave

Thanks for responding to my query.

I don't mind sharing the images I've had created for my book on Wikipedia, but what I'm trying to do is check that I've not inadvertently misrepresented the concept of TCP/IP (in terms of the importance of disaggregating the IP from the TCP), and also that I've visually explained the role of the IMPs (interface message processors) and TIPs (terminal IMPs) from the early days of the internet, c. 1970.

I'd have emailed them to you via the Wikipedia email service but couldn't see how to upload .pdfs.

Thanks for your help

Paddy's GirlPaddy's Girl (talk) 21:42, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Istriot

Do you like to play pogs?90.193.151.67 (talk) 06:09, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Chad vader.png)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Chad vader.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. MikeWazowski (talk) 16:50, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1st Wikiproject UK Politics Newsletter

The first UK Politics newsletter is currently available at WP:WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom/Newsletter. All participants of the project have been subscribed to receive copies of the newsletter. You can unsubscribe simply by removing your name from the Subscription list. Regards. Road Wizard (talk) 20:01, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Legislature

Hi. I have reverted your changes to {{Infobox Legislature}} as they caused a major break on some articles. Where image widths were not specified the altered box decided to download a full size image instead.[1] I have temporarily reverted you until the code can be run through a sandbox and the error removed.
I have set up a sandbox environment with your code changes at User:Road Wizard/Sandbox 5 and a transclusion to show the effects at User:Road Wizard/Sandbox 6. Feel free to play around to find a fix. Road Wizard (talk) 00:00, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Infoboxes

This is in regard to your changes to a number of the infoboxes. Your edits will be reverted. This is not the correct use for the infoboxes. The captions are allowable. That is why they are there, for description of the images. musimax. (talk) 00:23, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I have to agree with Musimax there. There are people who are out there that may not realize that the image in the infobox is the logo. єmarsee • Speak up! 02:07, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RfD nomination of "almanac of british politics"

Osbourne

Go on then...don't just tag and run. Off2riorob (talk) 02:58, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Election candidates

Are you intending on adding articles for all election candidates? by the looks of things (Andy Burnham's remark/gaffe), it will be in May. Is that enough time to get all candidates on the books? DinosaursLoveExistence (talk) 08:32, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deletionpedia

Thank you for this idea. It is a pity that there is no German one. I was looking for the deleted German page "Human Design System". But it was gone. Do you have any idea where it is archived? I am not interested to make a new page out of it - but just want to read it. --Alsterblick (talk) 00:52, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jeremy browne Mp for Taunton

Dear H2g2bob,

Re your revision to the Jeremy Browne page. First let me say that i have an interest in this page above the ordinary but that that is not my purpose in contacting you.

Taunton is a fiercely contested marginal seat. That having been said, this is an article about the person who is the MP, not a political page about the constituency.

I have looked at the pages for all five MPs representing seats in Somerset, alao those in Devon, Cornwall and Bristol, to get an idea of the standard level of detail found in relation to local and national campaigning issues and activity.

Browne is in a minority of MPs not to have been asked to repay money in the 2009/10 expenses scandal. Eleven in the neighboring region have had to and there is no mention of expenses on any of their wiki pages. In fact of nearly forty pages for members of parliament in the South West of England I can only find two with any mention of expenses, let alone whole sections, and the most detailed is of only five lines. I am not sure that a list of highly selected items, legitimately claimed, for an office in expenses, from a list of over two thousand, over five years gives any greater insight into who Browne is.

In fact the whole expenses section in my opinion skews the balance of this page from the norm or the informative. It might be more reasonable simply to remove it. This being the case i am going to greatly shrink the section but publish this intent on the Browne discussion page should anyone wish to comment.

Many thanks for your consideration --Milk76 (talk) 01:52, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think yours is a good edit to this page. It is now balanced far better.--Milk76 (talk) 08:13, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Winston McKenzie page

Private e-mail sentHoovering (talk) 00:52, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox political party/seats

Thanks for adding new features and documentation. I had completely forgotten about that template and had been meaning to put it to some use! Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:37, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RPED extension

Hello, I have recently put up a site, rped.org, to demonstrate a new extension I am working on. Notice how it detects whether articles exist on the local wiki and/or Wikipedia, and then colors links red or blue accordingly, linking them to the appropriate url and giving the local wiki priority if the linked article exists there. When this extension reaches a stable version, perhaps it would be useful for Deletionpedia, since you don't mirror the articles that Wikipedia keeps, but you have a lot of internal wikilinks to Wikipedia articles that don't go anywhere. You wouldn't want to indiscriminately use interwiki links without existence detection, since then there would be a bunch of dead links; but on the other hand, it's good to provide a link if you can. No special markup is needed; just regular wikilinks.

I downloaded the m:Database dump of all 7,181,313 enwiki page titles and fed it into the extension so that it would know which pages exist and which don't; and I have perl scripts that can continually update the database using RecentChanges and deletion/restore log data, although I haven't brought those live yet. My goal is to eventually syndicate the page title data updates to client wikis, so that we don't all have to be querying Wikipedia constantly.

http://rped.org/wiki/index.php?title=RPED:Sandbox

Tisane (talk) 19:09, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, that looks really interesting! I'll take a look and see if I can use it - it would certainly be very useful. At the moment, I just style everything blue and have a link on the "page not found" error - this would be much nicer. Thanks for the link, and thanks for working on it :) --h2g2bob (talk) 00:19, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. And if you have any constructive criticism, feel free to let me know. MaxSem has been rather vociferous about the shortcomings of my code and of me as a programmer and contributor in general, but I think he's just nasty to everyone. This is the first code I've ever produced for Mediawiki (aside from a very minor core patch) so inevitably there's going to be a learning curve. The source code is public property of course, so feel free to contribute improvements to the file pages linked from mw:Extension:RPED/Pre-alpha release.

I think you may be able to get some functionality to work for you. The RPED special page (implemented by RPED_body.php)'s only purpose is to manage your subscription to the RPED central server, which is not really operational yet. So you might try just playing around with the settings in RPEDConfig.php (in my experience, you'll need to use a database user account other than the one for your wiki, by the way; e.g. if you're using wikiuser for your wiki, create another one called wikiuser2, give it the necessary privileges and tell RPEDConfig.php to logon to the database server using that one) and use the RPEDFileReader.pl or a bot of your own design to import the all-titles-in-ns0.gz data into the page_titles table. RPED.php should be able to begin remote page existence detection via the LinkEnd hook without your doing anything more. I don't know of any major security holes right offhand that remain in the code; RPEDAPIReader.php is designed to allow a remote user (specifically, the RPED central server) to provide information on what rows to insert or delete from your page title table, but it won't work unless you have used the special page to generate a password and to give that password to the central server. Tisane (talk) 02:00, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I made an enhancement to the RPED extension so that now you can set different styles (e.g. different colors or fonts) for links depending on whether they link to local articles (green), remote articles (blue), or are interwiki links (orange). These settings can be changed through RPEDConfig.php. You can see how it works at the RPED sandbox link above. Tisane (talk) 09:23, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Pure wiki deletion

My next project will be to implement PWD. Here is a little bit of info about what I have in mind. We might end up implementing this as part of the core (ideally), if consensus allows, or as an extension or hack. PWD, if implemented on Wikipedia, might sure make your task of harvesting articles for Deletionpedia easier, especially in reference to speedy deletions. Let me know if you want to collaborate on this; and if anyone else reading this is interested, feel free to drop me a line. Later, Tisane (talk) 07:26, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

David Lidington

I did not make an edit as such. I simply reverted the edit that was made previously to part of the article that had been there for years.

RPED, cont'd

Just letting you know, RPED is now in beta test over at http://libertapedia.org/ . It seems to be working all right, for the most part. Tisane (talk) 02:03, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Votes by party in the 1979 vote of no confidence against the government of James Callaghan.png

Thank you for uploading File:Votes by party in the 1979 vote of no confidence against the government of James Callaghan.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 21:39, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Some random user had removed the copyright tag ({{pd-self}}). --h2g2bob (talk) 22:11, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Run Level Zero

Hello. Any chance we could get some sourced commentary in this article? We need to have some discussion about the song in order to keep the audio clip.

Barry Gardiner

Just to say your edits were appreciated. The article had become an IP attack page and I really needed an unbiased 2nd opinion. JRPG (talk) 21:27, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hull North constituency

When you added the candidates for Hull North for the 2010 General Election, you omitted the English Democrats. I've fixed that, and added the result. Digifiend (talk) 08:43, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oops :( --h2g2bob (talk) 18:59, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Constituency infobox: population or electorate

The population of a constituency is quite difficult to find, whereas the registered electorate [at time of last election[[ is wideley published and easy to find. May I suggest that you add 'Electorate =', please? --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 15:43, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Inclupedia

Hello, just wanted to let you know about this proposal. Basically, this would be Deletionpedia on steroids. If access to the backend ends up being denied, as it probably will be, then the other way to go about doing this would be to start with a Wikipedia database dump, and then bring it up to date (and keep it up to date) using a bot that would pull data from Wikipedia recent changes. Let me know if you're interested in collaborating on this; if so, I think the best bot framework to use would probably be Peachy. Thanks, Tisane ^talk/_stalk 16:56, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Human

Thanks for your input. See Talk:Human#Update -Stevertigo (t | log | c) 01:35, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Eff tor.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Eff tor.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Tomchen1989 (talk) 22:59, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bounty Board Article

The reward that you offered is kind of outdated. Could you please either update the details, or remove the offer. Thanks, MrKIA11 (talk) 00:02, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for the reminder. I've updated the bounty description. --h2g2bob (talk) 22:13, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Number of releases of Phrack each year.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Number of releases of Phrack each year.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:23, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

St Martin-in-the-Fields

Well spotted. Reference added. I'm never sure how much architectural description is needed. There seem to be a lot of village churches better described than a lot of big London buildings, though.

Proposed deletion of List of Scottish National Party MPs (2005–2010)

The article List of Scottish National Party MPs (2005–2010) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article is small piece of List of Scottish National Party MPs, which is already a short list. Page is not necessary.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 20:34, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WP Internet Culture in the Signpost

The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Internet Culture for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. -Mabeenot (talk) 04:30, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Edwin Starr - War.ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Edwin Starr - War.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:56, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Awwhhhh

Awwh, I remember h2g2! Did you know this is currently showing til Sunday evening?[2] --Mistress Selina Kyle ^{(Α⇔Ω ¦ ⇒✉)} 20:52, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Shipping Forecast.ogg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Shipping Forecast.ogg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fish ^Barking? 22:07, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Piracy is a crime - Unskippable Anti-Piracy track.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Piracy is a crime - Unskippable Anti-Piracy track.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:07, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Marc Maiffret

The article Marc Maiffret has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

May not meet notability standards.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. I dream of horses @ 00:34, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Keith Wann for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Keith Wann is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keith Wann until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 16:21, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]