User talk:H.I.H Shah Jafar I

This is H.I.H Shah Jafar I's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Old Clan (July 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by S0091 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please see this guide for adding citations along with the notability guidelines. You may also find Your first article helpful.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Old Clan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 17:22, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, H.I.H Shah Jafar I! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 17:22, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello H.I.H Shah Jafar I! Your additions to Draft:The Old Clan have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. S0091 (talk) 18:11, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Please stop. If you continue to remove maintenance templates without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Draft:The Old Clan, you may be blocked from editing.

Only an admin after reviewing the request can remove the template. If you remove it again, I will request you be blocked. S0091 (talk) 18:40, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is not to be mean but copyright violations are a legal issue for both Wikipedia and the editor who adds the content, in this case you. S0091 (talk) 18:42, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia.

As you have been told before, do not remove templates. Blanking the draft does not rectify the copyright violation. It has to be handled by an admin. Continuing to remove the copyright violation deletion request and previous declines/reviewer's comments will result in you being blocked. Again, not being mean but you are being disruptive to Wikipedia's processes. S0091 (talk) 19:43, 28 July 2023 (UTC) S0091 (talk) 19:43, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Draft:The Old Clan has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Notrealname1234 (talk) 00:14, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Old Clan (July 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Karnataka was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Your 'note' does not change the procedures on how articles are reviewed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Old Clan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Karnataka (talk) 18:56, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:The Old Clan has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:The Old Clan. Thanks! S0091 (talk) 19:06, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:H.I.H Shah Jafar I

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:H.I.H Shah Jafar I, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. S0091 (talk) 13:53, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (It is only representing small introduction & articles on wikipedia thus, the user account is dedicated for the Malik Dynasty, owned by Malik Dynasty) --H.I.H Shah Jafar I (talk) 14:00, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your user page may not meet Wikipedia's user page guidelines. It is intended for basic information about yourself, your interests and goals as they relate to editing Wikipedia, as well as disclosures of conflicts of interest and paid editing. Although a lot of freedom is allowed in personalizing your user page, it is not:

an encyclopedia article (and should not be styled to look like one)
a workspace for a draft article
a personal website, blog, or social media site
a space for self-promotion or other advertising
a CV, resumé or lengthy autobiography

The user page guidelines have additional information on what is and what is not considered acceptable content. Please use your user sandbox or the draft article space to practice editing or to create new articles. Thank you. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:05, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Actually it is an account for submitting dedication and interest on Malik Dynasty. All the articles & documents which will be published from this account are authentic & approved by the Dynasty's Members. H.I.H Shah Jafar I (talk) 14:08, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello H.I.H Shah Jafar I. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:H.I.H Shah Jafar I. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=H.I.H Shah Jafar I|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:06, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I am not directed or indirectly asked to publish these articles or media. Btw I am the owner of these articles & media. H.I.H Shah Jafar I (talk) 14:28, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Then you have a conflict of interest and are using Wikipedia as a vehicle for promoting your work. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:20, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, H.I.H Shah Jafar I. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia. I'm sorry, but a page you created User:H.I.H Shah Jafar I has been deleted as meeting one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects of articles must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources which are unconnected with the subject and which provide verifiable information. Someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. Please see WP:CORP for subjects that are groups or companies or organizations. Please see WP:ANYBIO for subjects who are people. Please see Wikipedia:Common sourcing mistakes (notability). Wikipedia:The Wikipedia Adventure is a useful tutorial.

Also, encyclopedia articles must be neutral in tone and not use language that promotes or advocates for a subject, or tries to cast the subject in a favorable light. Please see Information on content and common pitfalls to avoid here and here. Sometimes creators of promotional/advocational content are bewildered that it is considered such. If one has been trained to write such content, or if one has spent some time writing such content, one may simply be blind to non-neutral phrases or styles.

A common assumption is that the prohibition against promotional editing applies only to businesses or organizations. Anything can be promoted, including a person, a non-commercial organization, a point of view, etc.

CV's/resumé's are by their nature promotional. Writing about oneself or any connected subject is discouraged as the connection can make objectivity difficult. Information on avoiding advocational content and common pitfalls is here and here, however be aware that these are not exhaustive.

New article creation can be difficult, but the Article Wizard can help you. The new user tutorial can help you avoid future problems. You can seek help IRC chat, as well as Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk Sometimes it is better to first gain experience by fixing and helping maintain existing articles. Wikipedia:Community portal/Opentask contains links to things that badly need doing, if you are so inclined.

User pages and User talk pages are intended only to assist collegiality among users. They are not to be used as a soapbox for writings not connected with the editorial process on Wikipedia. While we appreciate that you enjoy using Wikipedia, please note that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and

not a free webhosting service ,
not a personal website,
not a blog
not a social media site

Nor are user pages intended to host articles, CV's/resumés or lengthy autobiographies. Wikipedia is not a promotional venue or a place to post ads. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia ~ subjects of articles must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources which are unconnected with the subject and which provide verifiable information. For article creation, Please use WP:AfC and/or request help at the Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk. You can also seek help via IRC chat.

More information on user pages is available at THIS PAGE.

-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:15, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:H.I.H Shah Jafar I

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:H.I.H Shah Jafar I, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. (See section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Schminnte (talk • contribs) 18:51, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My User Page

Speedy deletion nomination of User:H.I.H Shah Jafar I

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:H.I.H Shah Jafar I, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. (See section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. H.I.H Shah Jafar I (talk) 18:54, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (It is actually about myself & what I am doing in wikipedia-Having a royal status.) --H.I.H Shah Jafar I (talk) 18:56, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. It is not a webhost for you to promote yourself. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:17, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Deepfriedokra the sole purpose of this editor is to push promote their pov/writings about about "The Old Clan". I don't know what this last User page stated but I do recall their previous User page stated they were the "official" account about The Old Clan. At the end of the day, they are not here to build an encyclopedia. S0091 (talk) 20:30, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@0091: I quite agree with your assessment. @H.I.H Shah Jafar I: you are tending ever closer to an indefinite block for your promotional, conflict of interest editing. My hope is that you will mend your ways, but I have my doubts. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:16, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

H.I.H Shah Jafar I, you have your own site where you can say whatever you want which is the correct forum for you. Your goals do not align with Wikipedia's goals so my best advice is to move on. It is a waste of your time and more importantly, the time of volunteer editors. Like @Deepfriedokra said above, if you continue you will be blocked. S0091 (talk) 22:01, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I understand. I want to preserve my Heritage in a trusted encyclopedia, but wikipedia doesn't grants then I will not do it> H.I.H Shah Jafar I (talk) 12:04, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

S0091 could you help to build a article where I could mention about my information: just tell me what I have to do. H.I.H Shah Jafar I (talk) 12:07, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Household Of Maliks

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Household Of Maliks, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of https://issuu.com/imperialclan/docs/the_entrepreneurial_legacy_of_the_malik_dynasty_. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Wikishovel (talk) 16:21, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

reasons? H.I.H Shah Jafar I (talk) 16:22, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikishovel I have recitated that source now including the name of the Publisher-

So sorry, it was a slight mistake.

If you think to add more changes, please let me know. H.I.H Shah Jafar I (talk) 16:32, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

All you've done is add the family coat of arms to the top of the article.

Sir, I'm sure your family is something to be very proud of, but you must please stop writing about them on Wikipedia. Wikishovel (talk) 16:58, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I am publishing some history about my dynasty. Could you tell me what I shall do next? to improve my article H.I.H Shah Jafar I (talk) 17:00, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Contest For speedy Deletion

{{subst:Db-notice-multiple|Household Of Maliks|header=1|G11|G12}} ~~~~

H.I.H Shah Jafar I (talk) 16:26, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Household Of Maliks

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Household Of Maliks requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://medium.com/@footcardage/entrepreneurial-ventures-of-the-malik-dynasty-7bf727d8d2e8. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mccapra (talk) 07:31, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —Cryptic 08:05, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think you have misunderstood what I was writing. H.I.H Shah Jafar I (talk) 11:32, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

H.I.H Shah Jafar I (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I wasn't promoting. Both pages were mine infact. Thus I was deleting my same page which was causing conflict. Now it is done.

Decline reason:

Blatant (breathtaking) violation of WP:PROMO. If this is what you think non-promotional content is, Wikipedia isn't the place for you. Yamla (talk) 11:34, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I am blocked because I mistakenly promoted myself

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

H.I.H Shah Jafar I (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Welp its no reason. There is a major problem. I actually wrote an article about myself which showed conflict of edits. Thus, when I tried to delete the article it was too late. I was blocked. I wanted to unblock so I could fix my article. Thank you!

Decline reason:

We don't get to write about ourselves on Wikipedia. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 13:48, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

H.I.H Shah Jafar I (talk) 11:40, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please Unblock me

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

H.I.H Shah Jafar I (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked on conflict of edits or whatever. Actually I was promoting myself-I mean making a small introduction about myself on my own user page which went wrong. I did not knew that wikipedia does not allows promotion of writer in the userpage also. It is a bit confusion which I apologize for. Please unblock my ip address plus this account. Best Regards, H.I.H Shah Jafar I. H.I.H Shah Jafar I (talk) 15:49, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The first point in the guide to appealing blocks say you need to show you understand what you are blocked for; "or whatever" does the complete opposite. Complaining about the block on your IP address shows you have been trying to evade the block by editing without logging in. Decline. Cabayi (talk) 19:21, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Need to be unblocked

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

H.I.H Shah Jafar I (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I need to be unblocked as it was a slight mistake which made an confusion in wikipedia. Thus, My humble request is to unblock me. Thank you H.I.H Shah Jafar I (talk) 08:39, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

None of us "need" to be here. You still have not done as requested. You are running out of chances; you'll likely get only one more on-Wikipedia chance to do so, so make it count. 331dot (talk) 21:25, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What a garbage is Wikipedia

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

H.I.H Shah Jafar I (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

wow, none is realizing that it was a slight mistake. Wikipedia is now one of the un trusted sources. How many are getting fooled by this so called Wikipedia.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline; user is no longer interested in being unblocked and is instead abusing the unblock template to rant. Yamla (talk) 13:51, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Appeal For Mercy and Unblock

Dear @Bbb23 and others.

I acknowledge that I created accounts for self promotional purposes. Now I realize that Wikipedia is really a place for good people. If a last time would have been pardoned to me, to justify to be a good wikipedian, to justify to be a good editor and a member.

Therefore, I plea for mercy and unblock all my socket accounts. Deleting my socketpuppets also will be a sign of harmony from the admins.

I apologize for all acts which I have done!

Thank you. H.I.H Shah Jafar I (talk) 10:31, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Don't do this. You know how to make an unblock request. Additionally, you've specifically stated you are retired and don't plan to edit. Accounts are never deleted, it's not possible. Finally, you went out of your way to attempt to deceive to us at User talk:Alamkhor. There's no chance you'll be unblocked after so recently lying to us. --Yamla (talk) 10:36, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Could you at least delete my socket puppet accounts. As well as this. H.I.H Shah Jafar I (talk) 13:44, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla, I know I had deceived by making another account. I want just mercy, at first I did not know much about creating a article.

It is just an acknowledgement of mistakes which I had done. Sir. H.I.H Shah Jafar I (talk) 13:46, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No. Accounts cannot be deleted. --Yamla (talk) 15:22, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok thanks for your help. H.I.H Shah Jafar I (talk) 14:06, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Important Information About H.I.H Shah Jafar I & Alamkhor.

As per the details @Alamkhor and @H.I.H Shah Jafar are one person. The person has used both accounts for promotional purposes & socket puppetry. This person is also alleged for impersonating a person who is a Mughal descendant. Therefore, these accounts were made from the same ip address. The Situation is resolved, now none have the authority to use Wikipedia or any other source for promotional purposes & socket puppetry.

The team has recovered both accounts from plagiarism and so admins now could unblock the ip address, in addition to they could unban one of the accounts or delete them or do whatever to them.

The team plead for apologies and for mercy also to unban this Ip address as soon as possible on behalf of the disguised person who impersonates not only an Imperial Figure but also the Wikipedia.

And so we request the proper unblock of the Ip address, afterwards these socket puppet accounts will be dealt by the wikipedia admins. The Internet Team for Malik has completed it's investigation against these puppet accounts which were used by the same ip address (this ip address is included in the premises of Imperial Figure).

We humbly request @Yamla, @Cryptic, @Bbb23, any other checkuser to confirm and unblock this ip address. We gave the authority to these mentioned users for dealing with this account.

Best Regards,

Himself The His Imperial Highness Shah Jafar I Of Malik Dynasty,

Any technical problem, do not hesitate to contact this account as now it is under the hands of the Authority Of H.I.H Shah Jafar I.

H.I.H Shah Jafar I (talk) 14:19, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is nonsense. Don't ping me again. --Yamla (talk) 14:28, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]