User talk:Gyijfvbjfg

January 2021

Hello, I'm Sundayclose. I noticed that you recently removed content from Lennon–McCartney without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Sundayclose (talk) 18:57, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Sundayclose. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Rodgers and Hammerstein, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 18:58, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Any Time at All, you may be blocked from editing. Sundayclose (talk) 02:41, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Here is one of your problems regarding sources. You don't seem to grasp that everything you add to an article must be verified by reliable sources. In these edits, some of the information may be sourced, but much of it is infused with your personal opinions, such as:

due in part to the international, and unprecedented success of The Beatles
most notabably, The Beatles
based on two guitars: lead and rhythm, a bass guitar
most notably, the internationally successful and influential, the Beatles produced a number of highly psychedelic tunes during the decade, such as Bike (song) by Pink Floyd, and Blue Jay Way by The Beatles.
including drums and 12-string Rickenbacker guitars, which were popularized by Beatles, John Lennon and George Harrison. The Rickenbacker tone
Baroque rock and can be heard on songs like The Beatles's "In My Life" (1965), with its baroque inspired harpsichord solo, being the first usage of the instrument in popular music of the 20th century
John Lennon founder of The Beatles, and in many ways the face of the 60s music [by the way, John Lennon was not the "founder" or "leader" of The Beatles]

Feel free to rewrite so that your edits are entirely sourced.

Note that I am a Beatles fan, which is why everything related to them is in my watchlist, so don't assume this has anything to do with any hidden agenda against the band. And as I've told you, Beatles articles have lots of eyes on them, so if you continue making these kinds of edits, there will be other editors who let you know about unsourced edits.

Please carefully read WP:V, WP:RS, WP:NOR, WP:NPOV, and WP:Verifiability, not truth before making any more edits.

I don't mind making suggestions for you to improve your edits, but if you come to my talk page with snarky comments, don't bother. I'll simply revert your comments as well as your edits. Sundayclose (talk) 04:57, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to 2020 United States presidential election. GorillaWarfare (talk) 03:14, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lucky: How Joe Biden Barely Won the Presidency moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Lucky: How Joe Biden Barely Won the Presidency, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 01:03, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lucky: How Joe Biden Barely Won the Presidency (March 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lucky: How Joe Biden Barely Won the Presidency and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lucky: How Joe Biden Barely Won the Presidency, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 19:43, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gyijfvbjfg! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 19:43, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

― Tartan357 ^Talk 05:04, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]