User talk:Gurnidar

Gurnidar, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Gurnidar! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

July 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Waheguru, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless used with permission. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:

If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternately, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 12:19, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. Unfortunately, content you added to a Wikipedia article appears to be a minority or fringe viewpoint, and appears to have given undue weight to this minority viewpoint, and has been reverted. To maintain a neutral point of view, an idea that is not broadly supported by scholarship in its field must not be given undue weight in an article about a mainstream idea. Feel free to use the article's talk page to discuss this, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. GPinkerton (talk) 15:45, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please DO NOT LIE. I had added references of several researchers such as Rupa Bhaty, Anil Narayanan, Sudarshan Bhardwaj, Nilesh Oak, Sarma, Roshen Dalal, Subbarayappa, Subhash Kaka with several of their works. Do you have any scientific publication to refute their work? Because I have plenty very reliable references to prove your references belonging completely to colonial era frauds.

Discretionary sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 22:47, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Care to detail how?. Where mine and several others' work was regarding the dating of Surya Sidhant was deleted without any basis. Despite of many references, the work was removed without providing any scientific basis. Presented NO counter evidence, No refutal of scientific work which is done to achieve the scholarly consensus on dating of Surya Sidhant. Where is it? to me it feels like an harrassment of individuals and intentional removal of BC era dating of Surya Sidhant despite of several reliable publications, books and references provided.--Gurnidar (talk) 23:02, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Again, see WP:ONUS and WP:CONSENSUS. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 23:25, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I completely second what you said. I went through the link you added on Lets discuss this in the sections. I need answer to why BC era dating cannot exits on Wikipedia (which infact is supported by several references and researches) along with the CE era dating. Even my references support CE era additions to Surya Siddhanta as it was mentioned in the original edits by @rahulchawla1990.--Gurnidar (talk) 23:42, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/RahulChawla1990, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 23:51, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]