User talk:Gurnam singh dhaliwal
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist (talk) 09:48, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
Highway no-13 listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Highway no-13. Since you had some involvement with the Highway no-13 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Vigyanitalkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 07:43, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
June 2014
[edit]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Gurnam Singh. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Vigyanitalkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 15:42, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
Autobiography
[edit]Please dont copy your own biography over already establish pages. If you wish you can create a new page with Gurnam Singh (actor) --Vigyanitalkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 15:46, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
June 2014
[edit]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Gurnam Singh, you may be blocked from editing. Vigyanitalkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 14:30, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Gurnam singh (actor), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://wpedia.goo.ne.jp/enwiki/Gurnam_Singh.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:47, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry
[edit]
It has been found that you have been using one or more accounts abusively or have edited logged out to avoid scrutiny. Please review the policy on acceptable alternate accounts. In short, alternate accounts or people to support you should not be used for the purposes of deceiving others into seeing more support for your position. It is not acceptable to use two accounts on the same article, or the same topic area, unless they are publically and plainly disclosed on both your and the other account's userpage.
Your other account(s) have been blocked indefinitely. This is your only warning. If you repeat this behaviour you will blocked from editing without further notice. Thank you. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 11:47, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation
[edit]
Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gurnam singh dhaliwal, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
Vigyanitalkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 23:14, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
June 2014
[edit] You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Vigyanitalkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 23:16, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of User:Gurnam singh dhaliwal
[edit]
A tag has been placed on User:Gurnam singh dhaliwal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 04:01, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
Blocked indefinitely
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. PhilKnight (talk) 23:17, 29 June 2014 (UTC)