User talk:Gunadatt

Welcome!

Hello, Gunadatt, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking

if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 04:43, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content
Miscellaneous
User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

July 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page List of Buddhists has been reverted.
Your edit here to List of Buddhists was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.stevejobsfollowers.tk) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 04:43, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Your recent talk page comments were not added to the bottom of the page. New discussion page messages and topics should always be added to the bottom. Your message may have been moved. In the future you can use the "New section" link in the top right. For more details see the talk page guidelines. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 10:35, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to List of Telugu castes has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: List of Telugu castes was changed by Gunadatt (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.932682 on 2017-04-25T09:47:46+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:47, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Golla (caste), it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 18:21, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Hello, I'm Sharkslayer87. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Velama have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Sharkslayer87 (talk) 17:14, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please tell me why the content is objected although i have given citiation published by patridge publishing india it is verified source. Gunadatt (talk) 19:03, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A book about Palnati yuddam written by srinatha kavi in 13th century and translated by GH roghair a scholarly evidence published by cambridge university, oxford university, stanford and hardvard also , Brahma Nayudu was decribed as a Velama the war took place in 1176 year. This happened during 12th century, implying that Velama as a caste existed then. we have to change the biased article on velama caste page there are a lot of scholarly evidences on this caste moreover the velama word first appeared in 14th century and not 17th century. wikipedia is biased depending one or two books as a sources is not viable option. I suggest consider my requests to edit velama page with valid scholarly evidences. Gunadatt (talk) 07:17, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Velama. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 18:44, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey am i not eligible to edit velama page now ? Gunadatt (talk) 18:51, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are not supposed to reinsert the same content that has been objected to, without achieving WP:CONSENSUS.

But, more generally, you seem to be vested in the topic. You are better off going and editing other topics and gaining enough experience with Wikipedia before attempting this again. Wikipedia has no deadline. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 18:54, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

can i continue contributing to velama article with other topics? Gunadatt (talk) 18:55, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please tell me why the content is objected although i have given citiation published by patridge publishing india it is verified source. Gunadatt (talk) 19:02, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The other editor has said that it is a Vanity publisher. I certainly don't see them as a scholarly publisher, and scholarly sources are needed for historical matters, as per WP:HISTRS.

My advice is still to stay off this topic until you become more experienced with Wikipedia. Caste pages need a lot more care and understanding than you have at this time. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 19:13, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Please tell me what does scholarly publisher mean give me some examples. Gunadatt (talk) 19:34, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A book about Palnati yuddam written by srinatha kavi in 13th century and translated by GH roghair a scholarly evidence published by cambridge university, oxford university, stanford and hardvard also , Brahma Nayudu was decribed as a Velama the war took place in 1176 year. This happened during 12th century, implying that Velama as a caste existed then. we have to change the biased article on velama caste page there are a lot of scholarly evidences on this caste moreover the velama word first appeared in 14th century inscriptions and not 17th century. wikipedia is biased depending one or two books as a sources is not viable option. I suggest consider my requests to edit velama page with valid scholarly evidences. Gunadatt (talk) 07:19, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I want to add this title and information for velama page it is from scholarly sources published by several well reputed universities such as cambridge, hardvard, stanford, wisconsin university etc.,

Title : Velamas relationship with Rajus

Velamas establish their relationship with the Palnadu Rajus and the kancerla Rajus by means of adoption, intermarriage, force of arms, and charisma.

Page no 138

https://www.google.co.in/books/edition/The_Epic_of_Paln%C4%81du/9VfSAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=0&bsq=epic%20of%20palnadu Gunadatt (talk) 14:24, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ARBIPA sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Kautilya3 (talk) 18:45, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A book about Palnati yuddam written by srinatha kavi in 13th century and translated by GH roghair a scholarly evidence published by cambridge university, oxford university, stanford and hardvard also , Brahma Nayudu was decribed as a Velama the war took place in 1176 year. This happened during 12th century, implying that Velama as a caste existed then. we have to change the biased article on velama caste page there are a lot of scholarly evidences on this caste moreover the velama word first appeared in 14th century and not 17th century. wikipedia is biased depending one or two books as a sources is not viable option. I suggest consider my requests to edit velama page with valid scholarly evidences. Gunadatt (talk) 07:17, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A book about Palnati yuddam written by srinatha kavi in 13th century and translated by GH roghair a scholarly evidence published by cambridge university, oxford university, stanford and hardvard also , Brahma Nayudu was decribed as a Velama the war took place in 1176 year. This happened during 12th century, implying that Velama as a caste existed then. we have to change the biased article on velama caste page there are a lot of scholarly evidences on this caste moreover the velama word first appeared in 14th century inscriptions and not 17th century. wikipedia is biased depending one or two books as a sources is not viable option. I suggest consider my requests to edit velama page with valid scholarly evidences. Gunadatt (talk) 07:19, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]