User talk:Gulakos
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Hi, it seems that you might be the owner or manager of the business that is the subject of one of our articles and are displeased with some of the contents. See Wikipedia:Contact us/Article problem/Factual error (from subject) for a general overview of ways to get problems fixed (as well as an email address). You can also mention specific problems on Talk: Rehs Galleries if you want specific mistakes corrected.
The email address is info-en-q@wikimedia.org. The first thing you might be asked to do is to privately establish your identity.
I see one of the conditions of your unblock in 2014 was that you not directly edit that page. Continuing to edit Rehs Galleries may lead to you being blocked again, likely permanently. Toddst1 (talk) 01:14, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- All I did was add links to the catalogue raisonne projects -- which are mentioned in the text and are now available for people to access at no charge. These are projects that are managed and maintained by the gallery. And updated the gallery's location, since we have moved, and put in the proper citation. I did not change any of the text which your editors destroyed years ago. I am sure that editor did not like us for some reason. Can you explain why you removed content that was there for years? Howard L. Rehs (talk) 01:40, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- I also just found out that your other account DissidentAggressor was the one that years ago removed most of the content from our page. Guess you flagged our page in case someone made changes. One day maybe you will have to explain why. Howard L. Rehs (talk) 01:56, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- The issue is that you're continuing to violate WP:COI and have continued to promote your gallery on Wikipedia in violation of our policies. You're a WP:SPA and are not here to build an encyclopedia in ways that don't benefit your business. Toddst1 (talk) 01:07, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
- I have not done anything wrong ... have not added any text that would promote our business in a biased way. I changed our address, and put in links to the online projects that we worked on (which were already mentioned in the gutted text). I also found it interesting that at one point you deleted information because it mentioned other members of our firm and you stated that was not allowed. You should check some of the other gallery listing and see that they mention other family members who work for the firm ... when they started working, etc. For some reason you have an agenda here. I wish you the best of luck in your life, and maybe one day the reason you are acting this way will come to light. Howard L. Rehs (talk) 01:20, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
- Here's my agenda: Wikipedia:WikiProject Integrity. I've been working on it for a long time and folks who only come here to talk about their family, their business and their accomplishments are not welcome as editors. Toddst1 (talk) 01:23, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
- I have not done anything wrong ... have not added any text that would promote our business in a biased way. I changed our address, and put in links to the online projects that we worked on (which were already mentioned in the gutted text). I also found it interesting that at one point you deleted information because it mentioned other members of our firm and you stated that was not allowed. You should check some of the other gallery listing and see that they mention other family members who work for the firm ... when they started working, etc. For some reason you have an agenda here. I wish you the best of luck in your life, and maybe one day the reason you are acting this way will come to light. Howard L. Rehs (talk) 01:20, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
- The issue is that you're continuing to violate WP:COI and have continued to promote your gallery on Wikipedia in violation of our policies. You're a WP:SPA and are not here to build an encyclopedia in ways that don't benefit your business. Toddst1 (talk) 01:07, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of User:Gulakos
[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Gulakos requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Cabayi (talk) 10:10, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- Obviously Toddst1 has an agenda here. Someone should determine what it is and why. I have not done anything wrong ... have not added any text that would promote our business in a biased way. I changed our address, and put in links to the online projects that we worked on (which were already mentioned in the gutted text). As I replied to Toddst1 ... I also found it interesting that at one point they deleted information because it mentioned other members of our firm and they stated that was not allowed. Someone should check other gallery listing and see that they mention other family members who work for the firm ... when they started working, etc. For some reason he/she has an agenda here. I wish them the best of luck in their life, and maybe one day the reason they are acting this way will come to light. Howard L. Rehs (talk) 01:24, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
- I also request that my deletion be reversed. Howard L. Rehs (talk) 01:25, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
February 2023
[edit]
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising, as you did at Rehs Galleries. You have done nothing but edit articles related to your business here on Wikipedia, despite numerous attempts to explain WP:COI. Toddst1 (talk) 01:27, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)