User talk:GujaratiHistoryinDNA

GujaratiHistoryinDNA, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi GujaratiHistoryinDNA! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hi GujaratiHistoryinDNA! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! POLITANVM ^talk 04:19, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Response to User RS6784

Apparently, Satish Chandra you mentioned also claimed that the origins of the Gujarati Sultans were Khatri. Here is the main source:

Here are other sources you may have removed from the article Gujarat Sultanate

References

Welcome

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This message is given to all editors who work on caste pages. Regards, LukeEmily (talk) 15:34, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

On ebay there is a painting listed as john henry hopkins wearing vestments and said to be from vermont

On ebay there is a large painting of hopkins in vestments and it says from vermont. The asking price is $20,000. I think it is over priced and would ask for less. 2600:1000:B16B:D131:0:5A:39B4:7F01 (talk) 03:16, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Please delete or else I will remove this as Spam GujaratiHistoryinDNA (talk) 23:38, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

March 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at The Great Khali, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Do not change sourced content or add unsourced content. See the sources. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:26, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Thanks, but I want to ask why is there YouTube as a source for the information I edited? GujaratiHistoryinDNA (talk) 13:18, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

I don't get your question, but I'll try to explain the YouTube source in it, if that what you're asking. The YouTube source is there to support his caste (Rajput) since caste requires self-identification per Wikipedia consensus and WP:BLP. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:58, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

But based on what other users have told me, YouTube videos are NOT a reliable source for videos. So I was in doubt. GujaratiHistoryinDNA (talk) 18:09, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

It depends on the content. This is an interview. A YouTube video by a non-reliable person/agency on Khali's background is not permissible. But here Khali himself is saying that he is a Rajput. So... There are news sources that mention him being a Rajput, though those would be reliable, our policy on self-identification would not permit usage of them. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:47, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Evin Lewis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ali Khan. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

July 2022

Hello, I'm Packer&Tracker. I noticed that you recently removed content from Jadeja without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ∆ P&t ♀√ (talk) 09:54, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I did not exactly removed any content, I tried to rephrase the first sentence due to the fact how the article has sources saying the Jadejas have Sindhi origin. So that's why I said the sentence "inhabits the state of Gujarat" over "Gujarati Rajput clan". GujaratiHistoryinDNA (talk) 18:52, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I have responded in the article Jadeja why I removed your content. GujaratiHistoryinDNA (talk) 02:36, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 31

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Muslim Rajputs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Turkic.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

Fixed GujaratiHistoryinDNA (talk) 18:52, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Edit war

Ranghar are a community of Muslim Rajputs in the Indian states of Haryana, Punjab, Himachal Pradesh, Delhi and Uttar Pradesh; and in Sindh (Muhajirs) and Punjab in Pakistan. GujaratiHistoryinDNA (talk) 09:29, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. .Slatersteven (talk) 10:35, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

I understood my mistake and I accept the decision. GujaratiHistoryinDNA (talk) 02:38, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Vaghela dynasty into Vaghela clan. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 22:05, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

Thank you, will understand from now onwards. GujaratiHistoryinDNA (talk) 05:03, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

Category:Buildings and structures of the Rajputs has been nominated for deletion

Category:Buildings and structures of the Rajputs has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Venkat TL (talk) 06:18, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

General Sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in South Asian social groups. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose discretionary sanctions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Venkat TL (talk) 06:23, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

August 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia. Editors are expected to treat each other with respect and civility. On this encyclopedia project, editors assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not appear to do at User talk:Venkat TL. Here is Wikipedia's welcome page, and it is hoped that you will assume the good faith of other editors and continue to help us improve Wikipedia! Thank you very much! Venkat TL (talk) 18:24, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

Apologies, but what did I say in which your sentiments got upset? GujaratiHistoryinDNA (talk) 19:11, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fareed Ahmad (cricketer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Asif Ali.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

October 2022

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Muzaffar Shah I. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Akalanka820 (talk) 03:41, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

Please read this here: [[1]]. Your queries have been explained by me, now please better stop it. Akalanka820 (talk) 04:37, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

You are trying to warn me? GujaratiHistoryinDNA (talk) 17:21, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

Please stop it for once. I am posting the answer to your queries which I had given to you on an editor's talk page [here] -GujaratiHistoryinDNA just see this reference you had added- [[2]], the details of it exactly says that the content are from Wikipedia articles - "High Quality Content by WIKIPEDIA articles! The Muzaffarid dynasty were sultans of Gujarat in western India from 1391 to 1583. The founder of the dynasty was Zafar Khan Muzaffar (later Muzaffar Shah I) who was governor of Gujarat under the Delhi Sultanate..." . It is a reference based on wikipedia articles not an academic reference. On Wikipedia, mirror contents are not used. Read WP:SPS, WP:MAF. You don't need rocket science to understand this. Akalanka820 (talk) 04:13, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

GujaratiHistoryinDNA your first reference added- [[3]], does not even have writers name, it has an editor's name there and they have collated it into a book (first page of it says). Now, please read what is WP:RS, WP:HISTRS, this reference added by you is not an academic reference at all as per it. You have already removed that rarebook third reference you added. That is another case of WP:SPS. If you are too much adamant on adding your content, please get an academic reference. And please don't write your opinionated statements... , these are not my opinion or the other editor's opinion. Now, you have been explained not by one but by two, therefore better not edit war on it. Akalanka820 (talk) 04:35, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

Akalanka, lets come to a conclusion, I do believe you might feel the first source wasn't right. HOWEVER, the second source comes from a well known author. GujaratiHistoryinDNA (talk) 07:28, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

All three references are unreliable and has been explained to you. If you still want it to add you can seek input from other editors through WP:RFC, the Russel reference openly says that it is a WP:UGC they have taken it from Wikipedia itself. Now please stop reverting and seek consensus on talk page for your references. The onus is on you as you want to include even after being explained that how those are WP:SPS, WP:UGC and not WP:HISTRS reference. Akalanka820 (talk) 14:56, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

even then if you got problem you can seek consensus through WP:RFC for what you want to add and whether your reference is reliable, academic or not. The responsibility to seek consensus is with you as you want to add a particular content. But please don't edit war on it to add your pov content which doesn't seem to be academic or by any historian. Akalanka820 (talk) 08:09, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Muzaffar Shah I shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
not only this article, same poor references you are continuously adding on Gujarat Sultanate and Muzaffarids (Gujarat), you have been explained here [[4]] how the references you are adding are WP:UGC, WP:SPS and not even by any historian. Stop it now and take it talk page or discuss it here. Akalanka820 (talk) 14:45, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

Discretionary Sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Venkat TL (talk) 10:05, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

Category:Cricketers at the 2016 T20 World Cup has been nominated for deletion

Category:Cricketers at the 2016 T20 World Cup has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Kirubar (talk) 14:17, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Arms of the City of Bombay

I have been admiring your tireless work on Gujarati heritage. I also see you are from Mumbai. I am looking at the city’s heraldry, or former heraldry: you might be able to help. In 1877, a formal grant of arms was made to the City of Bombay. I have only found two images: one in books by Arthur Fox-Davies and This one. In the blazon, according to Fox-Davies, the supporters are a lion and a leopard - but in both images the sinister supporter appears to be a tiger. (If this were mediæval European heraldry, a confusion over what the beasts of Asia look like would be understandable, but by the Victorian era some realism had broken into the ancient art.) Maybe the blazon is wrong, or maybe it was always ignored and a tiger was depicted, or perhaps those two images got it wrong. Are you aware of any better images of the full achievement of the arms granted to the City of Bombay? Any help you can give would be gladly received. Hogweard (talk) 14:11, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

Own Work

GujaratiHistoryinDNA (talk) 00:13, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Challenge accepted!

thmub

Hogweard (talk) 22:26, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

Bravo, you have defeated me GujaratiHistoryinDNA (talk) 22:51, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

May 2024

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Chariotrider555 (talk) 03:49, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

Sorry!! Forgot completely!! GujaratiHistoryinDNA (talk) 07:52, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Vaghelas

A tag has been placed on Category:Vaghelas indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:51, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Indian prime ministerial firsts for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Indian prime ministerial firsts is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Indian prime ministerial firsts until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

_signed, Rosguill ^talk 13:47, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Map of Himachal Pradesh kingdoms

Template:Map of Himachal Pradesh kingdoms has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:04, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

November 2024

Thank you for contributing to the article Gujarat Sultanate. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, wikis, personal websites, and websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight. These sources may express views that are widely acknowledged as pushing a particular point-of-view, sometimes even extremist, being promotional in nature, or relying heavily on rumors and personal opinions. One of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you. Chariotrider555 (talk) 01:36, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

@Chariotrider555: See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/GujaratiHistoryinDNA. - Ratnahastin (talk) 09:46, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/GujaratiHistoryinDNA. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

– bradv 02:56, 23 November 2024 (UTC)