User talk:Guerillero/Archives/2016/May
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Guerillero. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The Signpost: 2 May 2016
- In the media: Wikipedia Zero piracy in Bangladesh; bureaucracy; chilling effects; too few cooks; translation gaps
- Traffic report: Purple
- Featured content: The best ... from the past two weeks
You've got mail
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 17:14, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
WikiCup 2016 May newsletter
Round 2 is over and 35 competitors have moved on to Round 3.
Round 2 saw three FAs (two by 
Cas Liber (submissions) and one by 
Montanabw (submissions)), four Featured Lists (with three by 
Calvin999 (submissions)), and 53 Good Articles (six by 
Worm That Turned (submissions) and five each by 
Hurricanehink (submissions), 
Cwmhiraeth (submissions), and 
MPJ-DK (submissions)). Eleven Featured Pictures were promoted (six by 
Adam Cuerden (submissions) and five by 
Godot13 (submissions)). One Featured Portal, Featured Topic and Good Topic were also promoted. The DYK base point total was 1,135. Cwmhiraeth (submissions) scored 265 base points, while 
The C of E (submissions) and MPJ-DK (submissions) each scored 150 base points. Eleven ITN were promoted and 131 Good Article Reviews were conducted with MPJ-DK (submissions) completing a staggering 61 reviews. Two contestants, Cwmhiraeth (submissions) and Cas Liber (submissions), broke the 700 point mark for Round 2.
If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Thanks to everyone for participating, and good luck to those moving into round 2. Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs · email), and Godot13 (talk · contribs · email) -- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:00, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:48, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Requested Unblock, Did You Get my Email
| I have no interest in conversing with you --In actu (Guerillero) | My Talk 19:47, 11 May 2016 (UTC) |
|---|
| The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|
Hi Guerillero (happy Cinco de Mayo), did you and the rest of the Arbcom mailing list receive my email of April 24? I asked to be unblocked. I was a contributor of solid content for five or six years before I was perma-blocked without warning with a button click falsely labeling me a sockpuppet by an administrator that didn't explain anything. I was proud of my contributions to Wikipedia and would like to do so again. As you look into my case (as I expect you to, given your position as arbitrator) do not accept as fact any accusation against me without allowing me to respond. I have endured many many lies and WP:AN/ANI mob attacks in which I was muted and my defenses erased, resulting in damage to my reputation as an editor. Further, do not accept the assertion of Thryduulf at my talkpage that I am on an "appeal timer," because he has no authority to do any such thing and there is nothing in policy that allows him this, as well his purporting timing is unevidenced and suspect. Answer my email or unblock my talkpage and we'll be able to communicate about this important matter. Colton Cosmic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.195.209.135 (talk) 15:18, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
"my successors look forward to your appeal in 2017 -Guerillero" Did you know Bwilkins once banned me for 20 years? And that he was serious? You're a sterling member of Wikipedia's administrative bullyocracy, G, and it won't be forgotten ever. Colton Cosmic. |
The Signpost: 17 May 2016
- Op-ed: Swiss chapter in turmoil
- In the media: Wikimedia's Dario Taraborelli quoted on Google's Knowledge Graph in The Washington Post
- Featured content: Two weeks for the prize of one
- Traffic report: Oh behave, Beyhive / Underdogs
- Arbitration report: "Wikicology" ends in site ban; evidence and workshop phases concluded for "Gamaliel and others"
- Wikicup: That's it for WikiCup Round 2!
Hatting my comment
I think the 3 gamergaters who decided to jump on my sympathies for Gamaliel rather proved my point about the way Gamergaters behave. Sad that their goal is to harass people wherever they can. Prostetnic Vogon Jeltz (talk) 04:45, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Disappointed
Disappointed with your comment here. They've had a mandate since 2005. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 04:54, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Query re deleted article
The subject of a deleted page Lorin Berland, wrote to Wikimedia (ticket:2016051710016583) wondering what happened to the page. I explained that it was created by a banned or blocked user, but the edit summary brings me to this page: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Ntiele
I don't see the editor, user:Cynthy101, mentioned on that page or at the archive page: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Ntiele/Archive
What am I missing?--S Philbrick(Talk) 17:00, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
- It looks like I never tagged or blocked the account but it follows the same general pattern of the other accounts. It is as hell right now but I might have something in my notes right now. I object to restoring the article for a number of reasons that I am willing to discuss via email. --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 02:48, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Stale- Not surprisingly, the subject would like it restored, but I'm not inclined to given the circumstances. I'd like to give the subject a little more information. Would you mind if I pointed her to your email address, and suggest that she contact you? --S Philbrick(Talk) 18:11, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Quite frankly, I would have deleted the article for a litany of reasons even if it didn't come up in a socking investigation. It was an obvious paid fluff piece that was being held together by duct tape made of trivial mentions. I am not inclined to restore the page or speak with the subject via email. (Please do not give out my email.) --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 03:25, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Not surprisingly, the subject would like it restored, but I'm not inclined to given the circumstances. I'd like to give the subject a little more information. Would you mind if I pointed her to your email address, and suggest that she contact you? --S Philbrick(Talk) 18:11, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 May 2016
- News and notes: Upcoming Wikimedia conferences in the US and India; May Metrics and Activities Meeting
- Special report: Compensation paid to Sue Gardner increased by almost 50 percent after she stepped down as executive director
- Featured content: Eight articles, three lists and five pictures
- Op-ed: Journey of a Wikipedian
- Arbitration report: Gamaliel resigns from the arbitration committee
- Recent research: English as Wikipedia's Lingua Franca; deletion rationales; schizophrenia controversies
- Traffic report: Splitting (musical) airs / Slow Ride