User talk:Guerillero/Archives/2015/June
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Guerillero. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
A kitten for you!
Y'all usually don't get recognized for quick action and good deeds so here's a kitten for your edits on Talk:Caitlyn Jenner. It's heartwarming to see the quick and decisive action on that page.
EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 06:15, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you, EvergreenFir. I'm only trying to do the right thing. --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 06:24, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:58, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 03 June 2015
- News and notes: Three new community-elected trustees announced, incumbents out
- Discussion report: The deprecation of Persondata; RfA – A broken process; Complaints from users on Swedish Wikipedia
- Featured content: It's not over till the fat man sings
- Technology report: Things are getting SPDYier
- Special report: Towards "Health Information for All": Medical content on Wikipedia received 6.5 billion page views in 2013
- Traffic report: A rather ordinary week
E-mail?
Hi, Guerillero. I have sent you two messages through the wikimail feature, one on May 3 and one on June 9, yesterday. May I ask if you have received either of them? I've been assuming you got the first one and preferred not to reply, since I posted an YGM template on your page which you didn't answer or query, but still, maybe not. Best not assume. A simple "Yes I got them" or "No I didn't get them" will do me. Bishonen | talk 19:21, 10 June 2015 (UTC).
- @Bishonen: Sorry, yes I got them. I have been prepping for a new job and packing for vacation, so I have been swamped. --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 20:33, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
Admiral Markets Group
Hello, I am a new user and I have some questions regarding an article (Admiral Markets Group) which was deleted. Is it possible for you to kindly give me your contact details, you can contact me at ifr_ko@hotmail.com . We can discuss how to solve the issue and it will help for future articles as well. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ifr ko (talk • contribs) 12:54, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- I am currently on vacation and may take several days to answer any queries. (I am currently writing this on my phone.) --In actu (Guerillero) | My Talk 20:56, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- @Ifr ko: I am only willing to discuss this issue on wikipedia, in public, with you. --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 05:01, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
Thank you
Thank you for showing your support for the WP:Women's health. It takes a bit of effort to leave a message, but it really is encouraging to the other editors and myself.
The Signpost: 10 June 2015
- News and notes: Chapter financial trends analyzed, news in brief
- Traffic report: Two households, both alike in dignity
- Featured content: Just the bear facts, ma'am
- Technology report: Wikimedia sites are going HTTPS only
Clarification
Doug Weller is both vacating and taking a seat on the AUSC?--Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 18:27, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
- @Ponyo: It is an awkward way to put it, but yes, he is sitting as an Arb Auditor for another 6 months --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 18:29, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 17 June 2015
- Arbitration report: An election has consequences
- News and notes: Labs outage kills tools, self; news in brief
- Featured content: Great Dane hits 150
- Discussion report: A quick way of becoming an admin
- WikiProject report: Western Australia speaks – we are back
The Signpost: 24 June 2015
- From the editor: The Signpost tagging initiative
- Featured content: One eye when begun, two when it's done
- Technology report: 2015 MediaWiki architecture focus and Multimedia roadmap announced
- News and notes: Board of Trustees propose bylaw amendments
- Arbitration report: Politics by other means: The American politics 2 arbitration
please check news
I read this news:
http://www.darkhorizons.com/news/29981/-2-guns-sequel-3-guns-on-the-way
So i created that what you deleted
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3_Guns?redirect=no
You should have checked these :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Men_In_Black_4?redirect=no
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2283336/
http://www.denofgeek.us/movies/sequels/247114/139-movie-sequels-currently-in-the-works
Before deleting and typing implausible.
Do you Know Jurassik World redirect was created almost 10 years ago:
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jurassic_World&action=info
--Cosmic Emperor 16:52, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
- Since you are blocked, I don't think this needs a reply --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 18:05, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
Adminship
I just wanted to offer you a note of thanks for your support over at my RfA. It was greatly appreciated, and I'll do my best to make sure your trust in me has not been misplaced. :-) --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 05:41, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
- Cheers --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 18:13, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
Your signature
Hello there! I'm working on a project trying to bring most of the coding on Wikipedia up to the most current standards (HTML5), and I noticed that your signature is using <font>...</font>
tags which were deprecated in HTML 4.0 Transitional, marked as invalid in 4.0 Strict, and are not part of HTML5 at all. I'd love to help you update your signature to use newer code, and if you're interested, I suggest replacing:
[[User:Guerillero|<span style="color:#0b0080;">Guerillero</span>]] | [[User_talk:Guerillero|<span style="color:green;">Parlez Moi</span>]]
with:
[[User:Guerillero|<span style="color:#0b0080;">Guerillero</span>]] | [[User talk:Guerillero|<span style="color:green;">Parlez Moi</span>]]
which will result in a 143 character long signature with an appearance of: Guerillero | Parlez Moi compared to your existing 129 character long signature of: Guerillero | Parlez Moi — Either way. Happy editing! (t) Josve05a (c) 13:49, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
- @Josve05a: No, I am not changing my signature, which still renders correctly in every modern browser, to be longer so that it complies to the newest version of HTML. I can't see a single benefit here. --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 18:10, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
- You should at least consider it. The MediaWiki software could in the futere drop support for obsolete elements. But sure, you can keep using obsolete elements until they become totally defunct if you want, instead of a 24 charater longer signature, your choise. Happy editing :) (t) Josve05a (c) 18:20, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
- It would be somewhere between silly and dense for MediaWiki to break backwards compatibility for the signatures used in the first decade or so of Wikipedia's existence. --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 20:16, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
- You should at least consider it. The MediaWiki software could in the futere drop support for obsolete elements. But sure, you can keep using obsolete elements until they become totally defunct if you want, instead of a 24 charater longer signature, your choise. Happy editing :) (t) Josve05a (c) 18:20, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
See edit summary
See [1] Thank you. Feel free to revert after you read that if you disagree. Jehochman Talk 20:01, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
- Also, I think it important to hold arbitrators to the same, or better, standards than other administrators and editors. And we are all "colleagues". Language shapes behavior. Jehochman Talk 20:03, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
- @Jehochman: The title that you seem to dislike was put in place because it was more neutral. The case isn't being framed as a review of GW's conduct, it is being framed as a general look at how Arb Enforcement works. --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 20:10, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
- Okay, how about naming it Arbitration Enforcement 2015, so it is distinguished from other discussions of Arbitration Enforcement that I believe have happened before, and that I believe will happen again in future. Jehochman Talk 20:13, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
- @Jehochman: While I don't think this disambiguation is necessary, I am ok with that title. --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 20:34, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
- Is that the interpation for the committee on behalf of the community? Hell in a Bucket (talk) 20:14, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
- @Hell in a Bucket: I am currently inactive and only speak for myself. --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 20:34, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
- Okay, how about naming it Arbitration Enforcement 2015, so it is distinguished from other discussions of Arbitration Enforcement that I believe have happened before, and that I believe will happen again in future. Jehochman Talk 20:13, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
- @Jehochman: The title that you seem to dislike was put in place because it was more neutral. The case isn't being framed as a review of GW's conduct, it is being framed as a general look at how Arb Enforcement works. --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 20:10, 27 June 2015 (UTC)