User talk:Guerillero/Archives/2012/May
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Guerillero. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The Signpost: 30 April 2012
- Paid editing: Does Wikipedia Pay? The Consultant: Pete Forsyth
- Discussion report: 'ReferenceTooltips' by default
- WikiProject report: The Cartographers of WikiProject Maps
- Featured content: Featured content spreads its wings
- Arbitration report: R&I Review remains in voting, two open cases
My RFA
Hi, I just wanted to leave a note saying thank you for partcipating in my RFA, and your comments will be taken on board and acted upon. Hopfully, I will be of a level you can support in a future RFA. MrLittleIrish (talk) © 12:55, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: April 2012
| ||||||
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low 
to High 
, while for quality the scale goes from Low 
to High 
.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:51, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
Psychology for beginners ;P
"Nothing to see here, move on" ... is almost guaranteed to make people open the archive just to see what it said! Humans are perverse things ;P Pesky (talk) 16:16, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks pesky --Guerillero | My Talk 17:05, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
You're invited: Smithsonian Institution Archives Edit-a-thon!
|
The Signpost: 07 May 2012
- Paid editing: Does Wikipedia Pay? The Communicator: Phil Gomes
- News and notes: Hong Kong to host Wikimania 2013
- WikiProject report: Say What?: WikiProject Languages
- Featured content: This week at featured content: How much wood would a Wood Duck chuck if a Wood Duck could chuck wood?
- Arbitration report: Proposed decision in Rich Farmbrough, two open cases
- Technology report: Search gets faster, GSoC gets more detail and 1.20wmf2 gets deployed
Hi! The Frederick Russell Burnham FAR is still ongoing and has been moved to FARC. If you have the time, it would be appreciated if you could revisit your comments there, and perhaps give us your opinion as to whether the article should be kept as a FA or delisted. Thanks! Dana boomer (talk) 12:36, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
Wikimania Education Meet-Up
Thanks for signing up on the original Wikimania Education Meet-Up list! I'm really excited to see everyone at Wikimania this year, and I'm starting to plan what we could do and when we could have our Education Meet-Up. I've created a form to collect information] from everyone who's interested in coming on what times work best, what activities people are most interested in during the meet-up, and what everyone's T-shirt size is. :) Please fill out the form, and I look forward to seeing you there! -- LiAnna Davis (WMF) (talk) 21:30, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
Ferahgo the Assassin
Is there a way she could get a topic ban instead of an indef ban? She is very helpful in palaeontology related topics, and I, and many others in the palaeontology projects, would feel that it would be a great loss if she was unable to contribute there. She also provides excellent illustrations of extinct animals. FunkMonk (talk) 10:41, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
- Sorry, I am only the messenger. I do not have a role in making decisions. You could ask arbcom this but here is the thing: she was already under an indefinite topic ban at the start of the case. The arbs knew this and chose to ban her for no less than a year. I am certain that your request will be rejected. cheers --Guerillero | My Talk 17:36, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
- Ah, didn't know that, I haven't followed the case, just had her talk page on watch. Too bad then, but thanks. FunkMonk (talk) 17:38, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 14 May 2012
- WikiProject report: Welcome to Wikipedia with a cup of tea and all your questions answered - at the Teahouse
- Featured content: Featured content is red hot this week
- Arbitration report: R&I Review closed, Rich Farmbrough near closure
Thanks
Thanks for the reply at AN/I. I recently came back from an indefinite block for edit warring, so, unless it's downright vandalism, I've been extremely careful on reverting stuff more than once that I'm not familiar with. - Zhou Yu (talk) 13:35, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
BN question
Well, not a question, but more like "I made a general statement over at the 'crat noticeboard". See my follow-up at Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard#Rich Farmbrough De-sysop at your earliest convenience, if you would. Thanks. EVula // talk // ☯ // 21:44, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
- I will pop over there. --Guerillero | My Talk 06:14, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
Protection of my user page and Jprg1966's
It seems like another IP (218.188.39.33) is attacking our talk pages now, exactly like the Vandal you just blocked. Seems like Warning and Reverting would just waste time here. Achowat (talk) 18:02, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
- My Admin Hero! Thanks! Achowat (talk) 18:04, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
- Your welcome :) --Guerillero | My Talk 18:06, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
- You made me feel so important, Guerillero! No greater honor for an anti-vandal than to have his page protected! :) --Jprg1966 (talk) 06:32, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
Userfy request for Harrah's Joliet
Hi, would you mind restoring Harrah's Joliet to my userspace? It's almost certainly notable and I'd like to rescue the article. Toohool (talk) 23:51, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Special Barnstar |
| Thanks for your contributions, Guerillero. SwisterTwister talk 02:48, 20 May 2012 (UTC) |
- Thank you very much :) --Guerillero | My Talk 03:20, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
User:24.171.168.132
The IP 24.171.168.132 is a school IP address. I recommend keeping it blocked. :) -Runningblader 11:39, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
- The IP has never been blocked before. 48 hours is a good starting point. If they vandalize again and again the blocks can progress up to 6 months - 2 years --Guerillero | My Talk 16:20, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
Please fill out our brief Teahouse survey
Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts and staff at WP:Teahouse would like your feedback!
We have created a brief survey intended to help us understand the experiences and impressions of veteran editors who have participated on the Teahouse. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests pages some time during the last few months.
Click here to be taken to the survey site.
The survey should take less than 15 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!
Happy editing,
J-Mo, Teahouse host
This message was sent via Global message delivery on 01:13, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 21 May 2012
- From the editor: New editor-in-chief
- WikiProject report: Trouble in a Galaxy Far, Far Away....
- Featured content: Lemurbaby moves it with Madagascar: Featured content for the week
- Arbitration report: No open arbitration cases pending
- Technology report: On the indestructibility of Wikimedia content
TB
Message added 16:20, 22 May 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
benzband (talk) 16:20, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
Project Punk Newsletter: May 2012 (Volume III, Issue II)
| Announcements and news for WikiProject Punk music | |
|---|---|
|
May 2012:
Articles
Features | |
Delivered by In actu (Guerillero) on behalf of WikiProject Punk. You are receiving this because your user name is listed in Category:WikiProject Punk music members or on our participants list. If you would like to stop these sorts of updates please remove the userbox from your profile, remove the category from your profile, and/or move your name down to the Inactive/former members section of the participants list. Thanks.
Cheers,
benzband (talk) & Guerillero | My Talk 06:25, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
Here is the list
List of monuments of the Gettysburg Battlefield. A lot of these are from a day I spent tramping around. Many listed have poctures, but there are many more. The 3rd Michigan(I think) recently came up in a discussion about Lorado Taft, so that would be a great one to include. Happy hunting, wish that I were along. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 14:27, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
Wiknic 2012
|
Great American Wiknic - Pittsburgh | 
|
| You are invited to the second Great American Wiknic taking place in Schenley Plaza, in Pittsburgh, on Saturday, June 23, 2012 starting at noon! This is a chance for all of the wikipedians in the Greater Pittsburgh area to meet for an afternoon of fun and fellowship. This is a bring your own lunch event, if you have special treats you would like to share feel free to bring them. We would love to have you there! |
Message delivered by Guerillero | My Talk at 22:50, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
Thanks
For your filemover. I will try my best to do well here. Btw, could you please remove filemover bit from my old account. I don't use it anymore. Thanks in advance--Morning Sunshine (talk) 06:13, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
Note the list isn't really to list "bad" images in the sense of any moral judgment, it's to list images that are prone to misuse in vandalism. Since most image-posting vandals are doing it for shock value, these sets often overlap (for common definitions of "bad", anyway), but the overlap is not perfect. I'm not going to revert your removals or even ask you to do so—after all, the vandals misusing those images may have moved on long ago—but from your edit summaries I thought you might not be aware of this distinction.
BTW, T16281 is about renaming it to something with less implication of morality, but it has to be done in code and there is no consensus on a new name. Anomie⚔ 11:00, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for the notice. I agree with that bug. I have been working with Russavia (talk · contribs), an admin and crat over at commons, to reduce the size of the list. A good chunk of the images have been deleted by him. --Guerillero | My Talk 15:20, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
Greetings Guerillero. As the case clerk for WP:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Rich_Farmbrough#Remedies, would you be able to transfer any resulting decisions to WP:Editing restrictions#Placed_by_the_Arbitration_Committee, for clarity? —Sladen (talk) 13:32, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
- I forgot about that. Thanks --Guerillero | My Talk 17:57, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
- Appreciations. Looking at the diff [1] I fear Rich's addition restriction + enforcement scheme have not made it across yet (Remedy (2) regarding automation and Enforcement (1) via WP:AE). Would you be help to assist with adding these? —Sladen (talk) 10:14, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
Done --Guerillero | My Talk 17:05, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
- "Topic Ban"[2] ? (I'm wondering if this should be changed to "Edit restriction"). —Sladen (talk) 01:04, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
- Hmm. I see your point... --Guerillero | My Talk 03:46, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
- Many appreciations[3] (and thank you for the extra time and work tidying off the case closure). —Sladen (talk) 03:50, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
- Nice to see you found antoher place you can sitck your oar in. Rich Farmbrough, 13:06, 27 May 2012 (UTC).
- Rich, Whether you, or I, agree/disagree with the ArbCom decision, it is better for clarity to have that decision uploaded to the correct location on WP:RESTRICT. Why not instead focus on the aspect that it did not happen automatically or as quickly as it could have; and try to get that fixed for future ArbCom processes by suggesting that this step (arguably the most important piece of close-down) be added prominently to the clerking process checklist? —Sladen (talk) 13:14, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
- It's not the important part. When this happens ArbCom has already failed. Were you constantly running around "supporting" the clerks one might be a little neutral about this. Or were you helping try to construct new models for ArbCom . But fairly clearly it's simply because it's about me. I find that unpleasant. Rich Farmbrough, 17:36, 27 May 2012 (UTC).
- Yes Rich, it is about you.[4] Trying to stop you from getting yourself completely banned.[5] Trying to help you fix rules.[6] Trying to guide you[7] to participate and get unblocked[8] To be WP:UNINVOLVED I didn't take part in the ArbCom discussions; to leave the door open for trying to mentor you back to normality. But there's[9] a[10] pattern[11]. It's a wiki, I'm perfectly capable of making the simple edits Guerillero did—but I didn't, did I? (Question: Why would that be?) Please learn to accept[12] assistance[13] from other editors who offer it, directly or indirectly, without attacking them. —Sladen (talk) 23:58, 27 May 2012 (UTC) (Guerillero, apologies that your personal talk page is being diverted like this).
- It's not the important part. When this happens ArbCom has already failed. Were you constantly running around "supporting" the clerks one might be a little neutral about this. Or were you helping try to construct new models for ArbCom . But fairly clearly it's simply because it's about me. I find that unpleasant. Rich Farmbrough, 17:36, 27 May 2012 (UTC).
- Rich, Whether you, or I, agree/disagree with the ArbCom decision, it is better for clarity to have that decision uploaded to the correct location on WP:RESTRICT. Why not instead focus on the aspect that it did not happen automatically or as quickly as it could have; and try to get that fixed for future ArbCom processes by suggesting that this step (arguably the most important piece of close-down) be added prominently to the clerking process checklist? —Sladen (talk) 13:14, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
- Nice to see you found antoher place you can sitck your oar in. Rich Farmbrough, 13:06, 27 May 2012 (UTC).
- Many appreciations[3] (and thank you for the extra time and work tidying off the case closure). —Sladen (talk) 03:50, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
- Hmm. I see your point... --Guerillero | My Talk 03:46, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
- "Topic Ban"[2] ? (I'm wondering if this should be changed to "Edit restriction"). —Sladen (talk) 01:04, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
- Appreciations. Looking at the diff [1] I fear Rich's addition restriction + enforcement scheme have not made it across yet (Remedy (2) regarding automation and Enforcement (1) via WP:AE). Would you be help to assist with adding these? —Sladen (talk) 10:14, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
Thank you Sladen. It is a tad disheartening to return from doing field work and I find my talk page is a skirmish site. --Guerillero | My Talk 04:33, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
- Not as disheartening as finding out someone is making sure maximum damage is done. Sladen bears a lot of responsibility for this 3 year mess, by spamming my talk page which kicked everything off. And yet he presumes to offer patronising "advice", while sticking the knife in elsewhere. Rich Farmbrough, 16:45, 28 May 2012 (UTC).
Dischord Records overhaul
They were originally farther along on my list, but I figure since someone else has shown interest in helping, I might as bump them up. I'm basically using Fat Wreck as a template. Create a category for X Records artists, go through the labels roster and add them all to the new category, and going through discographies and adding albums to the appropriate label category.Jasper420 19:15, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you for the information --Guerillero | My Talk 15:53, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
Logging sanctions for R/I Review
I'm not sure how this is traditionally handled, but would it make sense to log the sanctions of the review on the case page? aprock (talk) 14:51, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
- I am unsure --Guerillero | My Talk 17:58, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
- Yes. If a complaint is ever filed at WP:Arbitration enforcement about violation of the new restrictions, it is expected that a remedy from the case page must be specified. This won't be a simple matter unless the new remedies from the review are logged there. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 00:24, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 May 2012
- News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation endorses open-access petition to the White House; pending changes RfC ends
- Recent research: Supporting interlanguage collaboration; detecting reverts; Wikipedia's discourse, semantic and leadership networks, and Google's Knowledge Graph
- WikiProject report: Experts and enthusiasts at WikiProject Geology
- Featured content: Featured content cuts the cheese
- Arbitration report: Fæ and GoodDay requests for arbitration, changes to evidence word limits
- Technology report: Developer divide wrangles; plus Wikimedia Zero, MediaWiki 1.20wmf4, and IPv6
WP Punk Music in the Signpost
The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Punk Music for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. -Mabeenot (talk) 02:14, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low to High , while for quality the scale goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:27, 31 May 2012 (UTC)