User talk:Gthh

This is Gthh's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Estella Atekwana has been accepted

Estella Atekwana, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Zeromonk (talk) 17:06, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Courtenay Felix Bartholomew has been accepted

Courtenay Felix Bartholomew, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gpkp (u • t • c) 11:45, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Drafts and sandbox

Hello Gthh, Thank you for interest in drafting. I've just reverted your edits in here as because there have to be a redirection now. The link for ~~you~~ your new draft is here: Draft:Diana Comte.

Please do not remove redirects in any page(as you did here). A draft should actually be created in a new page, for example: Link. Please refer this page which helps you in creating new articles: Wikipedia:Articles for creation.

For any help on knowing what a sandbox is, please refer: Help:My sandbox.

Thank you and welcome to Wikipedia! --Gpkp (u • t • c) 14:56, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

^Thanks so much! I am very new to drafting and appreciate your feedback and suggestions! :) Gthh (talk) 21:34, 11 November 2018 (UTC) Gthh[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Gthh, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Blythwood (talk) 20:44, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Gthh! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 21:44, Sunday, November 11, 2018 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Your submission at Articles for creation: Diana Comte (November 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vincent60030 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Any media coverage?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Diana Comte and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Diana Comte, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

VKZY^LUFan (talk) (Mind the Gap!) 03:19, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gthh! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! VKZY^LUFan (talk) (Mind the Gap!) 03:19, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jane Dyson has been accepted

Jane Dyson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Zeromonk (talk) 13:18, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

mentorship - Chris Dobson

Hello Gthh, I see that you cut some of my text in the section "mentorship". Fine! Please, maintain at least the threshold (H-index 50) or this list will soon be too long!

Thanks--Norris Weals (talk) 12:06, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

RE: mentorship - Chris Dobson

Dear Norris Weals, thanks for adding that section. I think it is a very nice addition! Indeed, Chris Dobson mentored an entire generation of notable scientists! I renamed it because I was slightly concerned that the word 'legacy' was too biased and feared that the entire section would get deleted by another editor. To ensure that does not happen, it would be very helpful to add some references regarding Dobson's mentorship activities. By any chance, do you have any that state he was their mentor? If so, I would be happy to add them. Regarding notability, I think it is better to stick to Wikipedia's guidance on notability rather than an arbitrary h-index cutoff. Thank again for your contribution! Gthh (talk) 12:14, 16 September 2019 (UTC)Gthh[reply]

Nomination of Carl Smith (activist) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Carl Smith (activist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carl Smith (activist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. bender235 (talk) 16:43, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've nominated Corina Newsome and Earyn McGee for DYK

You can see the nomination at Template:Did you know nominations/Black Birders Week.

I encourage you to nominate future articles that you create, expand 5x in size, or bring to good article status. You can do so at WP:DYKN (nominations must be within 7 days of the article being started, expanded, or awarded GA).

Sincerely, The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:31, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Black Birders Week

Hello! Your submission of Black Birders Week at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 14:02, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please see new note on your DYK nomination. Yoninah (talk) 13:07, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Earyn McGee

On 5 August 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Earyn McGee, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that ornithologist Corina Newsome and herpetologist Earyn McGee held events as part of the inaugural Black Birders Week, an effort to highlight the challenges faced by Black nature enthusiasts? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Earyn McGee), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—valereee (talk) 00:02, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Corina Newsome

On 5 August 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Corina Newsome, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that ornithologist Corina Newsome and herpetologist Earyn McGee held events as part of the inaugural Black Birders Week, an effort to highlight the challenges faced by Black nature enthusiasts? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Corina Newsome), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—valereee (talk) 00:02, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Julie Forman-Kay

Hello, Gthh,

Thank you for creating Julie Forman-Kay.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Independent references will support notability

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Graeme Bartlett}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:44, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Hi Gthh! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Clare Grey that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 08:18, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Earyn McGee for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Earyn McGee is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Earyn McGee (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DGG ( talk ) 05:31, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]