User talk:Griseo veritas

Reading and writing are two of my biggest passions and as such I commonly spot and fix copy errors on Wiki pages.

Lover of Nintendo, music, coffee, and homebrew gaming tech.

Specious reasoning moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Specious reasoning, is not suitable as written to remain published. An article needs more information and citations from reliable, independent sources to remain in the mainspace. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline, has suitable content and thus is ready for mainspace, click the Submit the draft for review! button atop the article. Silikonz💬 15:15, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. How can I ensure in future that I move unfinished articles to draftspace? I wanted to ideally save it but couldn’t find a way. Griseo veritas (talk) 15:53, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You can just prefix titles with Draft:, and work on the article(s). Note that drafts inactive for 6 months will be deleted. When you are finished with that article you can move it to mainspace (see link for info). Silikonz💬 16:02, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you again for the information, this is very helpful. Appreciate you taking the time to explain so clearly. Griseo veritas (talk) 16:09, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Happy editing. Silikonz💬 16:10, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Specious reasoning (July 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Karnataka was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Requires more sources, may be considered a controversial topic.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Specious reasoning and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Karnataka (talk) 20:36, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Griseo veritas! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Karnataka (talk) 20:36, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Bebas Neue (typeface)

Hello, Griseo veritas. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bebas Neue (typeface), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rishi Khosla has been accepted

Rishi Khosla, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:11, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Griseo veritas. Thank you for your work on Rishi Khosla. User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 00:54, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, much appreciated. Griseo veritas (talk) 19:56, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Specious reasoning has been accepted

Specious reasoning, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

¹⁴¹ Pr {contribs} 20:33, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your work, I'm glad to know the improvements made to the page have been satisfactory and productive.

See you around! Griseo veritas (talk) 20:51, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Trafalgar Releasing moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Trafalgar Releasing, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GRINCHIDICAE🎄 19:10, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Praxidicae,

That's disappointing but I understand the issue. Apologies, I thought I had resolved it with my edits. I'll keep trying at it and submit for review once I'm done.

Many thanks Griseo veritas (talk) 14:16, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Trafalgar Releasing (December 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by BuySomeApples were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Trafalgar Releasing and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

BuySomeApples (talk) 22:38, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Goose Goose Duck

Hello, Griseo veritas. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Goose Goose Duck, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:06, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo for OakNorth Bank 2023.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Logo for OakNorth Bank 2023.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:45, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]