User talk:Gretchenmcc

Welcome!

Hello, Gretchenmcc, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

February 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Prudence Heward may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

.<ref>http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.com/en/article/prudence-heward/ The Canadian Encyclopedia]</ref> She was a member of the [[Beaver Hall Group]] and a co-founder of the [[Canadian Group of

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:38, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Gretchenmcc, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us!

I, and the rest of the hosts, would be more than happy to answer any questions you have! SarahStierch (talk) 16:57, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please join WikiProject Women artists!

Hello Gretchenmcc! Thank you for your contributions to articles related to Women artists. I'd like to invite you to become a part of WikiProject Women artists, a WikiProject aimed at improving the quality of articles about women artists on Wikipedia.

If you would like to participate, please visit the WikiProject Women artists page for more information. Feel free to sign your name under "Members". I look forward to your involvement!

SarahStierch (talk) 16:57, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

You rock!

13ab37 (talk) 03:06, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Community discussion on harassment reporting

There are many current proposals as part of the 2015 Inspire Campaign related to harassment management. I’ve created a page, Meta:Grants:IdeaLab/Community discussion on harassment reporting meant to serve as a central space where the various stakeholders in these proposals and other community members can discuss which methods might serve our community best so that we can unify our ideas into collective action. I encourage you to join the conversation and contribute your ideas! OR drohowa (talk) 02:20, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple similar bad revamps of language articles

Hi Gretchen. Could you look at the WP:LANG talk page, and tell us if the multiple bad revamps of language articles, all from single-purpose accounts, have anything to do with the latest editathon? Thanks — kwami (talk) 23:44, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Replied in full on WP:LANG. Short version is no, as far as I can tell. I haven't been running an editathon recently and I don't tell my newbie editors to edit like this. --Gretchenmcc (talk) 00:05, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Hello! I took some inspiration from your page while updating my own bio - thanks!

Loztron (talk) 11:03, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Aww, thanks Loztron, looks great! Btw, you've got an extra space at the beginning of a line, that's what's making your WikiProject Linguistics thing show up as code instead of a nice box! --Gretchenmcc (talk) 19:22, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WIR A+F


	Hoping you enjoyed the recently-held in-person Art+Feminism meetup, we cordially invite you continue your participation by joining the virtual worldwide online event hosted by Women in Red. March 2016 (Women's History Month)

(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 19:48, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Real Life Barnstar
	You've really done great work for the linguistics profession by organizing the LingWiki events. Cheers! TheLeaper (talk) 18:32, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Workshop

Saw the link about your upcoming workshop in Fairbanks and was curious. As summer is time to pursue paying work in Alaska, I dunno what chance I would have in taking part, though. However, I occasionally browse the Inupiat wiki. I find it totally bizarre that it would have an article on Ronald Reagan, all the while I've yet to find an article there on a notable Inupiat person, so hopefully your efforts will be of help there and anywhere else. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 08:23, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RadioKAOS, and sorry for the delay replying - I've been travelling and haven't had much internet time. That's super weird that the Inupiat Wikipedia would have an article on Reagan and none about notable Inupiat people, but I guess someone just decided to make one...is there a list anywhere of notable Inupiat people who don't have articles? It'll depend on the interests of the people at the workshop, of course, but that definitely sounds like an area that could use improvement and thanks for bringing it to my attention! --Gretchenmcc (talk) 00:01, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the Thanks!

Thanks for the The Tireless Contributor Barnstar! You’re the one who encouraged me to take the plunge into Wiki editing, via the LSA Editathon. So the credit it all yours! LingLass (talk) 20:06, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Gretchenmcc. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can you assist?

Hey! I've made a page for a famous female linguist that you might be able to contribute to. Would you check it out? Andrea L. Berez-Kroeker. Thanks!! --TheLeaper (talk) 18:52, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like it's in pretty good condition already! Would be nice to add a photo and infobox whenever someone's at a conference with her, but for now I've just moved the stub tag to the end per normal formatting conventions and added WikiProject tags to the talk page. --Gretchenmcc (talk) 20:11, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

example

I'm not sure it's a good example to create BLP articles with extremely minimal sourcing--in some cases, just an non-ndependent source that does not actually meet the GNG guideline, though it does indicate the existence of references that might do so. I'm sure you intend to develop articles like Rochelle Adonis further, but had I not checked that you were an experienced editor, I would have considered listing it for deletion. When I find I need to stop at a point like this--and it does happen to me also-- I add a tag {{under construction}} DGG ( talk ) 22:14, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rochelle Adonis for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rochelle Adonis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rochelle Adonis until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 05:36, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Gretchenmcc. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	Gretchen — student linguist Visvajit here! We met at the LSA17 conference in Austin. I'm very appreciative of your work improving WikiProject Linguistics, and am proud to say I've begun to follow in your footsteps. Thank you! Visvajit Sriramrajan (talk) 20:41, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Gretchenmcc. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Event coordinator user group

Hi Gretchen,

I saw on the schedule for the Annual meeting that you're organizing another edit-a-thon this year and you should request the event coordinator user right. That permission will give you the ability to create more than 6 accounts in one day and allow you to grant confirmed status to new accounts so that they can create articles, upload images, edit semi-protected pages, et cetera, without having to wait 4 days. You can get it by following the instructions at request for permissions and there is information on how to use it at the policy page on the right.

This is a change from the last time you ran it, the community decided to not allow new users to create articles, and in order to allow events, this usergroup was created. It's not difficult to get, you just need to show you're running an event, and it can make the event go much smoother. Excited to attend, and if you have any trouble with the permission, let me know on my talk page. Wugapodes [t^hɑk] [ˈkan.ˌʧɹɪbz] 03:29, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]