User talk:Greswik/Archive 1

Re: Machine man?

Hi Greswik, I did notice that ChillyMeerka had reverted their own vandalism. That's why I issued a level 1 warning rather than a level 2 warning. Would you kindly remove the vandalism warning you left on my talk page now? Thanks. Robotman¹⁹⁷⁴ 21:32, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. Robotman¹⁹⁷⁴ 21:33, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

If I would have given a test warning for that particular instance of vandalism it would have been level 2 anyway, so I think this is more than fair. Robotman¹⁹⁷⁴ 07:58, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

Lorne Calvert

Do not remove sourced/referenced information from this article. If you do so, you may be banned from editing Wikipedia in the future.

70.73.4.197 15:34, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Fun, getting blocked by an ip for removing vandalism. Looking forward to it...Greswik

You are the one who is vandalizing articles with sourced/referenced information. 70.73.4.197 15:43, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Ibrar Maqsood

Sorry, I think we were both re-adding the speedy tags at the same time and things got mixed up! Whitstable 17:57, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Not a problem mate Greswik

My Bot

I've replied on my bot's talk page. --TeckWiz ^ParlateContribs_@(Lets go Yankees!) 01:37, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Danish Nazism

Nothing to stop you adding a DB tag at all. I'm dubious that its sufficiently blatent enough nonsense to be speedy material but that all depends what admins are running through CSD. If they disagree the prod still stands until someone removes it and then it can go to AFD. --Spartaz ^Humbug! 20:40, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Just so you know, this is now at Afd after the author removed your speedy tag - oh and its miles worse now in terms of acceptability --Spartaz ^Humbug! 21:16, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

The article is at AFD now so I guess no further action is required on our parts. --Spartaz ^Humbug! 21:27, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Monaco GDP

The GDP figures that I posted (and you changed)were officially commissioned by the Monegasque Government.

-Pucini

EDIT: Thanks :-)

G. K. Butterfield‎

Thanks for you comment on my talk page. "Phenotype" may be "not very popular in Europe" but we are talking about an American politician. I think using "phenotype" in the article is appropriate because: (1) it is a neutral term (here anyway); (2) without its inclusion, the article had been subjected to challenges to Mr. Butterfield's status as an African-American, even with inclusion of information about the Congressional Black Caucus; and (3) perhaps most importantly, I know Mr. Butterfield and he has not expressed any objection to using the term. As for your trying to achieve a compromise between editor 143.231.249.141 and me, although I appreciate your efforts and don't doubt your sincerity, the issue was settled between the two of us. He/she was taking a rather radical position that Mr. Butterfield is not African-American because his skin is not dark enough (ironically, using his phenotype to argue that he is not African-American). My strongest objection was to denying his status as an African-American, but I also felt (and still feel) than including the word "phenotype" is both appropriate and necessary. This may be a point of disagreement with some, but I don't think the majority opinion (which includes Mr. Butterfield) is that it should be removed. Thanks. Ward3001 17:54, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

(posted in at the top without header)

Thanks- I'm getting a better hang of this--Charlesemorganiv 17:59, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

signing and warning

Yeah, it's going to take me some time to get in the habit of signing. My apologies. Ok, I'm confused... It's not a warning? That's what it says here. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Template_messages/User_talk_namespace#Usual_warnings --Pizzachicken 20:15, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Oh nevermind! I misunderstood what you said. You were saying that your comment is not a warning, just a notice. I did some searching on the aforementioned page and found the "right template". subst:uw-tilde. Sorry, I'm new here. :) --Pizzachicken 20:19, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Speedy delete of Fritz Stansson

I know what you mean- it was a speedy anyway. The reason I didn't revert is because I am 404ing so much. They assure me on the IRC channel that it will be solved soon- fingers crossed... J Milburn 21:16, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Re: Atombomb

Ok, it's fixed (and unprotected) now; thanks for pointing that out. ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 16:40, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

(Posted in at the middle of the page, moved down here by me)

U lot r silly imbosils. id wish u too remove my warnings this is low. u silly scandanavian —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Command5 (talk • contribs) 13:01, 16 April 2007 [UTC].

I think it is a good idea to prevent this great idea from being ruined by non-constructive edits, thank you. Greswik 13:15, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Protection of aviation pages

M. Greswik, can you help in setting up protection for the Tuskeegee Airmen, Charles Lindbergh and Amelia Earhart pages which have seen a great deal of recent attention from vandals. Bzuk 1435, 23 April 2007, (UTC).

I'm not an admin, so I can't do that, either! :-) Try Wikipedia:Requests for page protection if you think it is warranted. Greswik 18:39, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

moved from my sandbox (thats not the place to leave messages, folks;-)

I haven't done anything wrong to you I just wanted to get you to know that you can't tell people what to do. Then I went somewhere and my friend decided that is was fun to mess with my account. So I'm sorry she called you a "mother fucking bitch."--Bubblegum9898 17:18, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

yeah, yeah, big deal. No problem.Greswik 18:04, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Message Left on My User Page

I just wanted to say thanks for the kind words left today. While not exactly a newbie (I have been hanging around unregistered for a long while) I am new to what I am doing now. The templates I have been using were part of the tools I installed and I was unaware they were outdated. I have seen the templates you noted to me and have reverted to them a few times when I felt they were appropriate. I will start to use them on a more consistent basis. WildWildBil 20:19, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

signature in articles

Thanks for the advice !Ezra haGuer 18:26, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

User:Example again

Hello. I must admit I used your User:Example to test out how a template really would look on a users page- I don't totally trust the preview function, and also didn't feel convinced it would be absolutely right within my sandbox. (which it seemed to be, though.) But regarding this user: is it really such a bad idea to use it as a testbed for usertalk edits? I mean, why not use it as a sandbox? The reasons for not testing on a page, as the fear of having someone loading a "vandalized" page, seems to disintegrate when we are talking about a users talkpage- and a nonexistent user, that is. Greswik 16:54, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

The problem with using it as a sandbox is that, since it's used as an example for things like {{user}}, what is written there will be seen by newbies. Of course, when testing a complex esoteric template which might work differently when on a subpage or in a different namespace, you have to test somewhere like there (testing on your own user/user talk page doesn't work as well because of the automatic bolding); it would be best, however, if we had a "sandbox user" for tests like that. --cesarb 17:19, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the advice

I changed the entry to English. Thanks again for the advice. It was about the article Prokuplje Cata1609 20:08, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

A safely valve is rather different from a pressure reducing valve. The former shuts off the supply when certain critical conditions occur such as a fire. A pressure reducing valve, reduces the pressure to a pre-determined level, but doesn't shut off the supply.

Marking edits as minor

If you remember, you gave me a lot of good advice including a suggestion to mark edits as minor. I have not yet got round to taking all of your advice but I did start marking them as minor. As I suggested, I had not done this because I did not want to decide and/or dispute with other editors whether my edits are major or minor. Now a user has complained Even worse, you have marked the edits as minir (m). Sigh.

Could you help me respond to that user please? Lightmouse 11:17, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

jaring

In psychiatry, the term is used to describe the creation of words which only have meaning to the person who uses them. It is considered normal in children, but a symptom of thought disorder indicative of a psychotic mental illness such as schizophrenia in adults.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jaring&action=history

If Dirty Sanchez is in Wikipedia, why can not a phobia be in. Do you have something against us? We are really just trying to gain awareness for our concern. As we have seen with the Gays and Blacks, as people become more aware and familiar with these conditions, they become more accepted. Believe me that i wish this was not part of who i am, but it is part of who i am.

Can the addition be reinstated? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kscrivner (talk • contribs)
Answered on Kscrivners talk page. Greswik 07:27, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism

why did you say i vandalized wikipedia. i didn't do anything —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dude719 (talk • contribs)

May have been several things. Possibly this diff. [[1]], based on your history - like this [[2]]. And please remember to sign your posts on talkpages.Greswik 20:12, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

re: Antonio Imbert Barrera article

I will edit this article very soon, but calm down and just wait for it. May be simply, because you are Norwegian you misunderstand the english in the article. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tioeliecer (talk • contribs).

(this was about me prodding an article for being machine-translated) I can see someone has helped you out with it. Good! Greswik 11:47, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

posted without header or signature from User:EX Terminatorul

The page WAS full of facts about gypsies, but your "brother in arms" "Themightyquill" deleted every time I wrote it! And puted his where he says that the history and movement of the gypsies are for him "an enigma"..., but deleting the articles of others which KNOWS everything about the history of the gypsies because they LIVED more than 40 years (4 hours a day) in their midsts and learn their UNWRITTEN history! The shithead "Themightyquill" started a war wich he never ever could win and keep deleting any orticles of anybody wich seems to know more than him. I wonder why does he even write an article where he says that he does not knwo anything and the gypsy history is for him "an enigma" while other which KNOWS are being systematically deleted by this 2-bit dictator and self-appointed "all_might" on wich side YOU are know. So, 2-bit dictators, do not wonder why do you get the reactions you get, because YOU asked for it! I never heard of you before you so dictatorial removed my article. Go play with yourself somwhere if you do not have something better do to or to dictate! mate!

The page WAS full of facts about gypsies, but your "brother in arms" "Themightyquill" deleted every time I wrote it! And puted his where he says that the history and movement of the gypsies are for him "an enigma"..., but deleting the articles of others which KNOWS everything about the history of the gypsies because they LIVED more than 40 years (4 hours a day) in their midsts and learn their UNWRITTEN history! The shithead "Themightyquill" started a war wich he never ever could win and keep deleting any orticles of anybody wich seems to know more than him. I wonder why does he even write an article where he says that he does not knwo anything and the gypsy history is for him "an enigma" while other which KNOWS are being systematically deleted by this 2-bit dictator and self-appointed "all_might" on wich side YOU are know. So, 2-bit dictators, do not wonder why do you get the reactions you get, because YOU asked for it! I never heard of you before you so dictatorial removed my article. Go play with yourself somwhere if you do not have something better do to or to dictate! mate! —Preceding unsigned comment added by EX Terminatorul (talk • contribs)

Say, are you the same person with that small square black moustache from the second world war? Or are you "Themightyquill"? For you information (which your aussi brain seems to completelly lack of) the site IS meant for articles and not personal disputes! But ther was NO dispute until YOU started one under the nickname of "Themightyquill" deleting other people articles without any shame, remores or interest for the truth, keep putting back again your article where you ("Themightyquill") sauid that the history and movenment of the gypsy nation are for you "an enigma", therfore now knowing anything, but keep deleting articles of others wich DOES KNOW everything about..!?? YOU created and started this dispute, and now YOU complain about it? When was the last tiem yoiu consulted a doctor? If you are NOT "Themightyquill" but some asshole from "down-under" which also think about himself as an "all-mighty" being, you will get the same ase you partner inm crimes! So do NOt complain to me about it, when YOU on your own, came into the shit that your friend created and kept going on a site where is NO PLACE for disputs but foor INFO adn DATA, which you assholes do your best to STOP it from reaching Wikipedia like wikipedia would be your private playground!?? SHITHEAD! I tel you what I allready told the other Hitler: DO NOT PUSH IT! WE live allover teh world, we are continuously active on the internet (who isn't?), ,and we do NOT want (or intend) to remove crucioal information from wikipedia (robbing the world of important knowledge) just beacuse it is written by you or the other self appointed dictator, unless you FORCE US to do that, which is exactly what are you doing now to us! Deleting important articles wich tells the truth! If you still never heard of "DO not do onto others waht you don't like to be donne onti you", consider this message the FINAL warning! NORE YOU, nore any other self appointed piece of shit 2-bit rasist dictator will EVER be able to stop the truth (from this site/page of wikipedia or any other page of the billion pages...)EVER, so if you have at least one neuron in that paleozoic skull opf yours, listen to yhis advice: DO not start a war you can never win! (nobody can!). And do NOT create for yourself enamies! It is NOT wise! Is STUPID!

_______________________ I don't think there is much hope in communicating here. Greswik 17:37, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

But say, are you the same person as User:Zenon the forgotton? You seem to have very much the same edit pattern! Greswik 17:45, 31 May 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by EX Terminatorul (talk • contribs)

I am not. But are you the same as User:Zenon the forgotton? Greswik 18:20, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

babel festival

dear Greswik, i just edited a page about babel, a literary festival, writing the text just for wikipedia (previously i had copied it from the babel site, discovering that wasn't allowed). this text briefly says what the festival is about and is purely informative. —Preceding unsigned comment added by vannibi (talk • contribs)

The admins has deleted this twice, for spam and for being unremarkable, good luck with that. I'm not the one to convince today.Greswik 11:05, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Paula Abdul

I'm sorry for editing Paula's page like that. I was told by the news that Paula had indeed died and thought i should edit her page. I asked paula and she doesnt like wikipedia because they lie. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikiman999222 (talk • contribs)

I think I will just start deleting any responses from the vandals from now. Greswik 16:40, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Refactoring others comments

Resolved

 – Self-resolving notice.

FYI: Reply left at User talk:SMcCandlish#Refactoring others comments. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont] ‹(-¿-)› 07:42, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

posted without a header

I don't think i'm funny, i know i am

i'm just trying to spread the joy of laughter to really serious people who could use a good laugh —Preceding unsigned comment added by Geraldine 666 (talk • contribs)

Answered on Geraldine 666s talk page- with the hint of going to Uncyclopedia Which is the place for jokes. Greswik 13:34, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Sorry

My sincerest apologies. It took me a while to realize what was going on and I feel that I should explain. I am in high school and try to use wikipedia for research. My younger brother however, believed this free xbox 360 website and was trying to spam for his account. Please do not comment to the IP adress, because now my mother thinks that I am up to no good, when I am innocent. Once again sorry, I have changed the password on my name so you sould not find any more spam from this name. I admire people like you, because you keep Wikipedia a safer place and more reliable source. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Guitarhero627 (talk • contribs)

re: Louis Sockalexis

If you edited this page on June 11, I am a bit puzzled at the substition of the word "currier" three times instead of Sockalexis' name. Clearly it was a form of vandalism. If this wasn't you, I sincerely apologize. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.131.226.202 (talk • contribs)

Congratulation, you have found old, burried vandalism! You are partly right, I edited the page that day, but the vandalism was added earlier by 169.244.78.98 here: [3] - and then only partially reverted by that IP. All I did was to remove a link. My diff is here: [4] , so you are right, it wasn't me. Greswik 15:49, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

LHSOC

please stop undoing my edits on the lutheran high page. Mr.grasz 05:53, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Dear [[5]] You cannot name a person and say she has involved in a sex scandal. Also, which teacher dirigates the traffic on the parking lot is not interesting, and so on. Greswik 20:57, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

first off, i can say that the were, because it's true. and who are you to say what other people find interesting?Mr.grasz 23:20, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

I am a bit baffled by the two versions of your userpage, the first one, "Hi, my name is mike grasz i'm a fagot who pokes students with sticks.", and the second one, "Hi, my name is mike grasz i'm an administrator at Lutheran High School". Even if you now have blanked the page, it's still there to be seen. Apart from that I just ask you to read up on wikipedia policy.Greswik 23:35, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Lutheran High School of Orange County

A Million Thanks is one of our projects, and we still endorse it. Thank you for all of your help. I Couldn't do this on my own.

Also, The real Mr. Grasz at Lutheran High School, does not have an account. Unfortunately a student signed up with his email and name, and when Mr. Grasz saw the email come in he clicked yes for the email. If you wish to contact me at the school feel free to call me at 714-998-5151 ext.618, or to verify me please look at lhsoc.org and find my name in the user directory with the same phone and email.

cheers, Gary

(No header)

a dont understand -six nation state is a new band i was just mekin people aware of them

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Chris fleming (talk • contribs)

Well, Wikipedia is not for promoting.Greswik 15:20, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Hello

Hello im new here so i do not know what im doing... kinda weird. Anyway i just wanted to let you know that i cant find any links.. could you give me a few websites and tips to find them? --~~ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Matthew477 (talk • contribs)

Well, I don't know much about your game, I can see I reverted your edit as you deleted a lot of content as you put it in. I guess the links you want are the normal Wikipedia guidelines, I'll post some of them over at your talk page. Greswik 15:20, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Not for your ears

I was trying to delete the article, but having trouble. Maybe trying to add a speedy template would be best as I don't believe this bootleg needs an article. HappiestCamper 15:11, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Do whatever you think is best regarding the article. Might be best to prod it, but that's my opinion. I really feel it should be deleted as it is not an authorized album. Also there is information about the bootleg here http://evanescencereference.info/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page and it would be better just to create a link on the discography article itself rather than create an article which says exactly what evanescencereference.info says.

HappiestCamper 15:30, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Reply is on User_talk:HappiestCamper. ( I prod it then. Maybe I should have written "prodded for HappiestCamper, but well.) Greswik 15:41, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

The reason I asked you as you seem like you know what your doing. I'm a newbie who knows that if I try to prod it I will mess it up greatly, I mean just look at my userpage :D. But I appreciate your help as I didn't even know how to delete an article but now I have that knowledge of what to do and I'll use it in future. So thank very much for helping a frustrated newbie :D HappiestCamper 15:52, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

why did you delete my contribution to the manhasset high school page? Everything I wrote was true. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Daveeeooo (talk • contribs)

has been answered by Alansohn Greswik 19:45, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

gressy

yo gressy soz bout da page deleting my brother did it nd i managed 2 stop him b4 he deleted da whole team wnt appen agen soz sfe —Preceding unsigned comment added by Legend27 (talk • contribs)

sure.Greswik 21:10, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Mayonnaise Rubbing

Your PROD of it was removed by the article's creator, so I sent it to AfD. DMacks 04:38, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Just a quick Question

How do you give out warnings to people? —Preceding unsigned comment added by RockyB007 (talk • contribs)

You mean, when they make up things? Greswik 19:30, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Continued

In addition to the previous comment. How do you give warnings to people as someone keeps on vandalising and editing my home/user page and it is now really getting on my nerves. If you could just let me know I would really appreciate it. thanks, Paul Dewart. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.73.153.57 (talk • contribs)

Which userpage is that? Greswik 19:42, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

type in user: Pauldewart. just leave a reply about giving warnings then I will take the nessecary action, very helpful thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pauldewart (talk • contribs) .

I don't think I can help you. Greswik 23:30, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

Ok not to worry. Pauldewart 15:14, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Berry Burk

Agree to deletion. Thank you for your contribution. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Richmondapthunter (talk • contribs)

By all means. I was a bit quick thinking the bot was right there, too. "All's well that ends well." Greswik 20:02, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Cut and paste error

It was a cut and paste error converting my entry to Speedy Keep--Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 19:53, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, it didn't make a lot of sense for you to change another users vote from delete to speedy delete when you think it should stay, at least! :-) Greswik 20:06, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

It was one of those weird times where you hit save, and the previous entry you are making is still being saved, so it gives an edit conflict, and when you look at the edit history, your the only one listed. Where in Norway are you? My family is from Farsund. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 20:57, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

That would be on the other side of the country. Greswik 21:18, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Edit summary note

Hello. Regarding this edit summary: please be careful using comments like "boring nom" in your edit summaries, as they may be construed as uncivil. If there are problems with the nomination, by all means leave a note on my talk page. But edit summaries which take a judgmental tone are not conducive to a civil atmosphere. Regards. --Muchness 20:55, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

I am of course with you on not been uncivil in the edits summary. Several people had just written delete per nom, and I was about to write the same thing- very little creative of me. Hence, I was afraid of people rolling thru the edits found it boring. Do you have the impression I write ugly edit summaries as a rule? I must admit, it didn't even cross my mind you could think I thought your nomination was "boring". (Except for the part of being of a sad reason: no verification for almost a year. I don't really know how to put this, if you don't see what I mean.) Greswik 21:17, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

I am sorry, that was a bad mistake on my part and thank you for clarifying. Looking through the rest of your contribs I can see that you're an excellent and thoughtful editor, I don't see any problems with your edit summaries at all. Again, my apologies. --Muchness 21:44, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism?

Why is is vandalism to add references to recent events that anyone can find after a moment's googling? You some PR guy for the college or what? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nautilogos (talk • contribs) 16:14, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

I'm no "pr-guy for the college". But it is not the style for an encyclopedia to add disparaging links of this type. You find more about external links at the WP:EL. Greswik 16:21, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

So you think it's approriate for an encyclopedia article to come across as if written by a PR department? The article has no content in the slightest bit critical or even informative. The article is a transcription of some administration office's blather and anything possibly interpretable as negative is spun positively. You're a PR schmuck and that's it if you disallow discordant points of view. Removing my link to the riots and animal cruelty at the school simply make the article incomplete in the same way the catalog is. The links are not in the slightest bit disparaging either. They link to verifiable sources that are neutral (news organizations). Maybe in Norway, the truth is disparaging if it's embarrassing (to you). What a moron. --Nautilogos —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nautilogos (talk • contribs) 03:12, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

(no header]

Sorry about the shannanigans. I've never thought about another account before and would quite honestly frown upon it. Its just I don't like my edit count rocketing when I am in the middle of doing repetitive edits. Many people judge the WIkipedians by number of edits as final. Maybe I should carry on with mine for all edits and pretty soon it'll be in the top 3. even for those bot type edits that are made by the second . ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^"Talk"? 14:44, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Well, thanks for your time ;-). I don't see why you shouldn't just accept being a top-ten editor, though. Greswik 14:53, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

(more without header)

You removed my vandalism warnings on the Greg Schiano article stating that it was the "wrong article". What is the correct way of adding them? Should I leave the vandalized portion in the article and add the warnings? I'm a newbie and the editing instructions aren't very clear. Thanks for your help. Zmon66 15:27, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

The warning goes to the users talk page, not into the previously vandalized article. Of course you revert the vandalism. And then you warn the vandal. Greswik 20:26, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Munich Massacre article/Pkhetan

I think this guy is some sort of Palestinian agent provocateur who's going to keep effing with the Munich Massacre article. I don't know how to report someone for vandalism - can you keep an eye on this putz?

Thanks BassPlyr23 23:02, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

thanks

thanks for fixing the hockey link at the bottom of my page Jru Gordon 07:06, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

vandalism

hi, sorry, it's my brother messing around, please dont block me, i'll try to keep him off the computer —Preceding unsigned comment added by UlitmateLoserNo1 (talk • contribs) 16:00, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

bafana bafana

yes but i am so frustrated at their poor results it was a protest from me and many many others in this country. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sokkar (talk • contribs) 10:28, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

vandalism

im sorry to have been mistaken but whoever wrote that article made a miscalculation when determining the speed from knots to kph, 1 knot is 1.85 of a mile. therefore 10 knots is 18.5 miles per hour. am i not correct? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Can.u.spel (talk • contribs) 12:47, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

You don't seem to know the difference between mph and kph. 25 knots is 46 km/h, as the article read allready. Greswik 13:56, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

you have all the info from pat miller wrong...now he will scold you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alex32165 (talk • contribs) 14:14, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

message me back —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alex32165 (talk • contribs) 13:50, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

ill cut you

YOU DONT KNOW PAT MILLER. THERFOR ALEX IS NOT WRONG. YOU ARE WRONG, AND YOU OWE HIM. PAT MILLER WILL OWN YOU AND YOUR CHILDREN. AND THATS NOT MENTIONING HIS NEPHEWS. YOU WILL NOT BE HAPPY IF YOU CHANGE ALL OF THIS STUFF BACK. LET US TAKE CARE OF PAT MILLER AND WE WILL TAKE CARE OF YOU —Preceding unsigned comment added by Notmexican (talk • contribs) 13:55, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Excuse me.

Why the fuck did you delete my article on Dias Juturna? I wasn't even finished with it.

I'm going to re-create it. Don't fucking touch it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DiasJuturna (talk • contribs) 17:51, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

As the notice said: it was a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. This means it was impossible to figure out what the article was all about (someone fictious? Or real? ) Actually, the admin seemed to delete it as about someone not important enough for an entry. Anyhow, if you want to work on articles before you put them up, it is possible to do so in your own userspace. Like, User:DiasJuturna/Dias Juturna (just click on it and save.). BTW, if you use this kind of foul language you might give the wrong impression of being a problem, instead of a good contributor. Greswik 18:27, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

Spinodal decomposition

Hi,

Well I agree it is probably real, and the article almost entirely obscure to a non-mathematician. But there are no sources, so it looks like original research. NOR says that "The only way to show that your work is not original research is to produce a reliable published source that advances the same claims or makes the same argument as you." - and NOR says it should not be there if it is OR. I will tag it {{unreferenced}}, and wait to see what turns up - see WP:V. Regards, Springnuts 20:11, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the tip on "tl|". I am still wary of the article - it is the editor's first edit of any kind. Regards, Springnuts 20:28, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

RE: Account creation date.

Hi,

Thanks for asking. I had edited anonymously, but eventually got tired of having to deal with the blocks. The account was created just in case I ever needed it. It seemed the blocks were becoming more frequent, and made it worthwhile to always sign in. Hope this Helps. Cheers, --Aarktica 23:36, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

• By the way, I was recently informed of a way that I can be reached via email through Wikipedia. If you prefer, you can send me a note by clicking on special:emailuser/aarktica. --Aarktica 05:39, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Hello again. Thanks to your support, I finally obtained administrative access. I sincerely appreciate the positive feedback you provided in favor of my nomination, and would like to reassure you that your participation was indeed worthwhile. Please feel free to contact me if you need help with activities requiring administrative access; I would do my best to be of assistance to you. Cheers, --Aarktica 01:00, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Innocent

Just like to tell that I have done nothing of the such and that someone is saying that is me. Just to let you know. --58.165.191.66 03:08, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

17. april? Thats a half year ago! IPs change ownership - people would hardly think that was you. Still, my suggestion is you sign up for an account, so you are sure no-one thinks youre the old vandal ;-) . But basically, well, youre claim of innocence seems better founded than most claims of innocense probably is. Greswik 14:22, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Victoria Silvstedt

Hi! Can I ask before your edit on the Victoria Silvstedt did you read the Talk page discussion about the SkyNews issue? Accusing me of slander seems to defy wiki principles, and particularly WP:AGF. I have reinserted the text, but have found and used an alternate reference to the original one which has a less NPOV stance. Rgds, - Trident13 23:22, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

In your edit [6] you used a link named named "confirmed-victoria-silvstedt-is-a-prostituting-whore". I am surprised you think that thats is a link we want in our encyclopedia. You have used the edit summary "reinsert slander text" when you put that in, so I seriously think you should relax your insulted tone a bit (or, really, totally.) You have now found another link, this one is better, but it has many disgusting pop-up ads instead- thats bad too.Greswik 18:28, 9 October 2007 (UTC)