User talk:Grenck

Why the rapid-fire deletions?

Why are you doing rapid-fire deletions and triggering filters? Please stop and explain. -- Alexf^(talk) 15:28, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Alexf, this link is in spam list, and is definitely redundant. Also it will create problem for people who try to edit the article. --Grenck (talk) 15:29, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are not using edit summaries, and are clogging the filters with warnings. Please stop and discuss. I am not disputing your reasons, as I do not know enough of the subjects or the links. I am asking to put a stop until this can be discussed at ANI. If this has been discussed before and you have obtained consensus, please point to it. Until this is done, please stop clogging filters, else we will be forced to put a temporary block and open a case for discussion. I rather you do it in good faith. -- Alexf^(talk) 15:33, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Alexf, this has been added by admin - Black Kite. Therefore I assume that consensus was obtained--Grenck (talk) 15:37, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. As I am not familiar with it let's ping Black Kite. As I said, I am not disputing your actions. Saw an alert from rapid triggering of filters. You should do it slowly and in any case use proper edit summaries, -- Alexf^(talk) 15:43, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Grenck, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Grenck! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

Museum of Philistine Culture moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Museum of Philistine Culture, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 07:11, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Cherry into Prunus subg. Cerasus. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:16, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Prunus subg. Cerasus

Hello, Grenck,

Thanks for creating Prunus subg. Cerasus! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add your references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 20:11, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Eter

A tag has been placed on Eter requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

R3 and G5 by User:Grenck

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 21:48, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Trillian (disambiguation )" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Trillian (disambiguation ). Since you had some involvement with the Trillian (disambiguation ) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:16, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Museum of Philistine Culture concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Museum of Philistine Culture, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:37, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Museum of Philistine Culture has been accepted

Museum of Philistine Culture, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 06:32, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Canoeing and kayaking for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Canoeing and kayaking is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canoeing and kayaking until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

BilledMammal (talk) 03:22, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lydnevi

The article Lydnevi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Oneliner about a language sketch, which is little more than an alphabet and one sample text, no non-trivial coverage in relevant sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]