User talk:Greenguy2942

Welcome

Hello, Greenguy2942, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page Flowery Branch, Georgia have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. As well, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Sudo Ghost 03:02, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Flowery Branch, Georgia. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Sudo Ghost 04:18, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

I noticed your submission in Articles for creation, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/YearOne. Thanks! It will be reviewed by a volunteer soon.

Before it can be added to Wikipedia, your submission should have references. All articles on Wikipedia should have inline, numbered references after facts, showing the 'reliable source' (a newspaper, book, etc.) where the information can be checked, so that all information is verifiable.

Here's a video tutorial - hit play, then right-click for "full screen".

Here's an example of how to add references:

Chzz is 98 years old.<ref> The Book of Chzz, Aardvark Books, 2009. </ref>

He likes tea.<ref> Smith, John. "[http://foonews.com/Article42 Interview with Chzz]", Foo News, 1 April 2010. Retrieved 2011-05-22. </ref>

== References ==

That makes the references automatically display as small numbers^[1] which will link to the details in the section titled == References == at the end. You can see that example in action here.

Please add references to your submission, which will be reviewed as soon as possible. See also, Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners. If you need any help, just put {{helpme}} at the end of this page, followed by a question or get into our live help chat chanel at #wikipedia-en-help ^connect.

Best, ChzzBot IV (talk) 17:51, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/YearOne.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk or via live help

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! - Happysailor ^(Talk) 19:29, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Braselton, Georgia, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages TNT and TBS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Jackson County, Georgia may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:21, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Greenguy2942. You have new messages at SudoGhost's talk page.
Message added 01:13, 20 May 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Sudo Ghost 01:13, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/YearOne concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/YearOne, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 05:17, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as vandalism, such as the edit at Braselton, Georgia, are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can discourage newer editors. Please read Wikipedia:NOTVAND for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you. Sudo Ghost 08:26, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Buddy I want u to know that I built that page from what it was and to what it is now. Why don't you go get some friends and leave me and the page alone. I know the Town of Braselton very well and they know what I add to it and what I do to it and if they have an issue with any of it, they let me know when I come to their once every 2 week meetings. You need to back off before you make this into something bigger than it should be. The TOWN edits it's own page and you need to quit vandalizing it. If wikipedia management saw what incorrect edits and reverts that you have been performing you would lose your status on here in a heart beat. Keep up your terrible work and showing Wikipedia as a bad name as you have been doing and they will be contacted and notified. There is every BIT of evidence on HIS OWN PAGE that he races and LIVES in the Town of Braselton limits.

It doesn't matter that you know the town very well, the article is not yours and the edits were made for a reason. The edits you disagree with were not vandalism, so please do not refer to them as such. I don't have "status" on Wikipedia; I am an editor, just as you are and anyone else that wants to sign up would be. Wikipedia does not have "management" in the sense that you probably mean, but I have no issue with the community being aware of the edits I have made, as they are consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines (WP:V and WP:LISTPEOPLE for example). If you really feel that this is something that requires administrative intervention, however, here would be the place to take it. It is not sufficient that the person can show that he lives there, it has to be relevant to the article, and that is demonstrated by third-party sources. - Sudo Ghost 02:26, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bryan sellers

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bryan sellers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. -
→Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 01:53, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop wholesale blanking content

Wikipedia is not a game. If you continue removing valid content out of spite, you will very likely be blocked from editing Wikipedia in order to prevent further disruption. - Aoidh (talk) (formerly User:SudoGhost) 07:10, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You're the one not following your own rules buddy, get me banned and you're going down with me (:

Your article submission YearOne

Hello Greenguy2942. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled YearOne.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/YearOne}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 06:00, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi (talk), I don't have the time to complete the page so you may go ahead and delete it. Thank you.

February 2014

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Braselton, Georgia. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Aoidh (talk) 23:22, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

yea but remember, all I have to do to outrank you on this site is donate 50$ to wikipedia and ask for it in return lol.

You are more than welcome to test that theory out for yourself. - Aoidh (talk) 03:58, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Mill Creek High School, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Aoidh (talk) 05:26, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Hello, I'm Srich32977. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Bowe Bergdahl seemed less than neutral, so someone removed it for now. If you think we made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please, no soapboxing. Thanks. – S. Rich (talk) 02:18, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Greenguy2942. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]