User talk:GreenAppleClimber

Welcome!

Hello, GreenAppleClimber!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, 〜 Adflatuss • talk 16:36, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joseph Fink (March 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Crunchydillpickle was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Hey, thanks for the submission! I am declining because I don't see significant coverage of Joseph Fink. Based on WP:RSP, we can't rely on primary, non-journalistic sources (like the Harper Collins listings of his own books) nor articles written in Forbes by contributors, not staff writers. It's appropriate to put info about Joseph Fink in the existing articles about Welcome to Night Vale and Alice Isn't Dead, but I would say that he doesn't qualify for a standalone article right now. Let me know if you have any questions!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Joseph Fink and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Crunchydillpickle🥒 (talk) 19:56, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, GreenAppleClimber! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Crunchydillpickle🥒 (talk) 19:56, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Crunchydillpickle! Thanks for your insight. Still learning the ins and outs. I appreciate your diligence! Happy editing. :) GreenAppleClimber (talk) 17:15, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: DraftSight (July 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:DraftSight and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 01:10, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your time reviewing @SafariScribe!! I really appreciate your interest in this. Could you help me to understand some of the reasons behind the flagged sources? I think that these sources are largely very reliable, independent, and in-depth. But maybe you could point out one or two? I think I may just be misinterpreting the WP:RS parameters. Thank you very much! GreenAppleClimber (talk) 21:30, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: DraftSight (August 21)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by S0091 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

S0091 (talk) 19:45, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Joseph Fink

Hello, GreenAppleClimber. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Joseph Fink, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:06, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Joseph Fink

Hello, GreenAppleClimber. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Joseph Fink".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:46, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]