User talk:GreekGreenAnarchist100

Welcome!

Hello, GreekGreenAnarchist100, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! satusuro 15:28, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GreekGreenAnarchist100, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi GreekGreenAnarchist100! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Lightbreather (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:07, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Misleading edit summaries

Writing "fixed spelling error" in the edit summary field when in fact you are doing something else is not on. Mezigue (talk) 11:34, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In the same vein, changes to content are not minor, and should not be marked as such. A minor change would be to correct a spelling mistake, to alter the presentation or formatting in some small way so that it conforms with one of our guidelines, or similar (see WP:MINOR). Alakzi (talk) 02:25, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Jonathanarpith (talk) 14:31, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What's an "Insufficient edit"? Please read WP:BRD and bring it to discussion at the talk page if you object to the change. —Brigade Piron (talk) 21:01, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Moving pages

When moving pages, please don't just cut and paste the text into a new article, follow the instructions here and if administrator access is needed to complete the move, request it at WP:RM. thanks – filelakeshoe (t / c)  19:08, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to People's Republic of Poland, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". You have been warned about this and similar issues recently, but you have continued to make substantial edits without seeking consensus. Please engage in discussion with other editors.‎ Nick Number (talk) 13:59, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Polish People's Republic

Please see a notice of our policy on edit warring at {{uw-3rr}}. If you are unhappy with the current state of the article, you are welcome to explain your concerns at Talk:Polish People's Republic. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 00:17, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Archiving

It's not that difficult to archive, why are you insistent on not providing new archive links for references you insert? Serious question. -- The Writer 2.0 ^Talk 22:17, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. RGloucester — ☎ 14:33, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 15:08, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GreekGreenAnarchist100 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I demand an immediate end to the sock puppet investigation on the account Jets100. I am asking for the deletion of all the accounts associated with Jets100.

Decline reason:

Is that an admission that you are a sock puppet? PhilKnight (talk) 15:39, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.