User talk:Grampion76

Sorry you had to be met by false labels

I hope it hasn't pushed you away from wikipedia, your contributions are great so far, and were definitely needed. Thank you for your time and effort.— Dæ dαlus^Contribs 23:07, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for sticking up for me. Grampion76 (talk) 11:57, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Civility

"Spacing for reading comprehension (& wikipedia policy re; asperger/page ownership)" This is out of line. First of all, while DCGeist is a prominent editor, just because he reverted you (and I agree with him), doesn't mean he's owning the page. As for the 'asperger', what exactly are you saying here? That he has Asperger's and therefore his opinion is less relevant, or that you have Asperger's and that means you have to make this edit regardless of what anyone else thinks? If you think someone is acting in contravention of Wikipedia policy, bring it up on their talk page or elsewhere, don't be passive aggressive and cite it in the edit summary, as if that will prevent it from being reverted. --Golbez (talk) 20:26, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"or that you have Asperger's and that means you have to make this edit regardless of what anyone else thinks?"

Now that would be funny! :) Grampion76 (talk) 20:36, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"As for the 'asperger', what exactly are you saying here? That he has Asperger's and therefore his opinion is less relevant?"

Yes, I did mean this - some aspies are fine, while others can be a menace (had to say it).

Grampion76 (talk) 21:19, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please keep such thoughts to yourself in the future. It doesn't help anything. (I note that this appears to be your second attack on "aspies" in your two weeks here, don't make it a habit.) --Golbez (talk) 21:26, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]