User talk:Gracewan2016

Welcome!

Hello, Gracewan2016, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you created appears to be an article about yourself. This is a common mistake made by new Wikipedians—as this is an encyclopedia, we wouldn't expect to have an article about every contributor. Your user page, however, is a great place to write about yourself, making sure to stay within user page guidelines. Just click your user name at the top of the screen when you are logged in, and edit it normally.

The page you created about yourself may well be deleted from the encyclopedia. If it is deleted and you wish to retrieve its contents, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 00:55, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Grace Wan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Grace Wan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. —C.Fred (talk) 01:01, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gwan123. Thank you. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 19:13, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gwan123, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 06:11, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gwan123. Jim1138 (talk) 06:11, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a suspected sock puppet of Gwan123 (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this is a sock puppet account, and your original account is blocked, please also note that banned or blocked users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; and all edits made under this account may be reverted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NeilN ^{talk to me} 06:38, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Gracewan2016 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #17581 was submitted on Feb 21, 2017 08:52:50. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 08:52, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gracewan2016 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I would like to get unblock because I am real person Grace Wan. I only have one account is Gracewan2016. I don't have Bradlay2016, Gwan123 and Mistakejerry account. Those were another person account. I believe all the information is real. If I have unblock successful, I promise I will follow the Wikipedia policy. I will not break the Wikipedia rules. Unblock me please. Gracewan2016 (talk) 20:45, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Given the evidence presented in the sockpuppet investigation, including being caught out in a lie, your claim here just isn't plausible. Yamla (talk) 20:58, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gracewan2016 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I deserve to continue to be a Wikipedia user because I want to be an editor, I want to make a new article such as trips, hobbies, news, etc. I want to write my own articles about shows, events, stories, etc. I have lots of things to write and share important information to everybody. I am not a sock puppet. I apologize for what I did. I will not do it anymore. I no more violation to this website. I give and show the respect to this website and user. I will not delete any more editors comments. Gracewan2016 (talk) 21:31, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are blocked for abusing multiple accounts; I've reviewed the checkuser results, and they seem entirely accurate; this account and the ones that are blocked with it are technically indistinguishable. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 22:42, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Blanking

You are not permitted to blank current unblock declines. Do so again and you'll lose access to this page. --Yamla (talk) 23:50, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You chose to ignore this warning. Your talk page access has now been revoked. --Yamla (talk) 12:38, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Gracewan2016 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #18747 was submitted on Jul 15, 2017 08:23:58. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 08:23, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User has been engaging in block evasion as recently as 2017-07-15, using the Bonjour2017 (talk · contribs) account. User has continued attempting to recreate the same inappropriate article. --Yamla (talk) 13:13, 15 July 2017 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Gracewan2016 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #20220 was submitted on Jan 03, 2018 21:19:57. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 21:19, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]